Ok, I guess I need to learn to express my ideas better. The physical environment is part of the cultural environment. I am assuming you don't mean the physical environment like the climate, vegetation, etc. I am not criticising the people who commit honour killings. I am criticising the entire environment that led to it. Furthermore, I also am not saying there is anything we can/should do about it (but maybe there is?).
Even so, I also think a western approach could force values down peoples' throats to some extent, good or bad. Not completely, but at least partially. Howerver, this is off-topic, and I am not saying the idea is a good one.
Let me ask you something. Do you think there is a point to defining a "good" or "bad" value? How would you define it? And if not, then why not? Would you replace this with more specific, literal evaluations?