Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

So I'm thinking about this sniper...

vinylgroover said:


Sorry, I got off topic. I wasn't necessarily referring to this act but gun control and murder in general. I guess having been brought up in a gunless society i am poles apart in thinking on this topic with the majority of Americans.

VG, so what is your solution? Imposing more gun laws won't accomplish anything because criminals will not obey them. The UK is a perfect example of this. The crime in cities in the UK (in which guns are outlawed) is rising steadily while violent crime in the US is actually declining. So much for gun control as a means of crime prevention.

By the way click here to see how effective gun control has been in Australia. (I believe this happened a couple days ago)
 
Kalashnikov said:


VG, so what is your solution? Imposing more gun laws won't accomplish anything because criminals will not obey them. The UK is a perfect example of this. The crime in cities in the UK (in which guns are outlawed) is rising steadily while violent crime in the US is actually declining. So much for gun control as a means of crime prevention.

By the way click here to see how effective gun control has been in Australia. (I believe this happened a couple days ago)

Gun control is not a solution to preventing crime, it's a means to reducing the incidence of violent crime resulting in death.

You keep pointing to this statistic of violent crime. What i am talking about is death, not violent crime per se, there is a difference.

Sure, violent crime in Australia has risen as much as anywhere else in the world. What we don't have is anywhere near the number of deaths per capita caused by guns that you have in the U.S. Although i don't have stats for the UK, i'm sure the same would apply.
 
vinylgroover said:
Gun control is not a solution to preventing crime, it's a means to reducing the incidence of violent crime resulting in death.
Are you missing the fact that our neighborhoods with the highest rate of gun ownership have the lowest crime rates? Gun availability is not the exacerbating factor in violent crime and homicide - the violent criminal is.
vinylgroover said:
What we don't have is anywhere near the number of deaths per capita caused by guns that you have in the U.S.
No, you don't. Nor do you have anywhere near our rate of non-firearm related crime.
 
casavant said:


Thankyou. That's what I'm saying. I'd go out when I had to, but I don't think I'd be walking my dog in the park or anything. Fuck, let him "win".


Well I disagree if the person that is a Christian was shot he/she would win. They would be leaving this crazy place to heaven while the sniper has a place wee bit warmer for him.
 
vinylgroover said:


Gun control is not a solution to preventing crime, it's a means to reducing the incidence of violent crime resulting in death.

You keep pointing to this statistic of violent crime. What i am talking about is death, not violent crime per se, there is a difference.

Sure, violent crime in Australia has risen as much as anywhere else in the world. What we don't have is anywhere near the number of deaths per capita caused by guns that you have in the U.S. Although i don't have stats for the UK, i'm sure the same would apply.

Washington has strict firearm laws BTW. And look what happened. You're talking about AUstralia ? Then I could talk to you about Canada which has similar laws. Yeah firearms related crimes decreased a lot..... but non-firearms increased so much.... so whats the point ???
 
Top Bottom