stonecold54 said:yes the good thing about fast acting substance is that if problems occur you can stop and be in the clear faster. so in that sense the sides will go away faster if you see them, but they are still the same sides.
thx9000 said:
The problem is the metabolites of deca are going to cause problems long after the deca is all gone. Right? I don't know if that's helped at all by using a shorter ester of nandrolone.
well i guess as far as being shut down maybe but I was talking more about the gyno issues which are the main concern with me. it would be an interesting experiment though to see the difference in recovery rates between the esters.thx9000 said:
The problem is the metabolites of deca are going to cause problems long after the deca is all gone. Right? I don't know if that's helped at all by using a shorter ester of nandrolone.
BigAndy69 said:Many of you would be surprised to find out how much of a difference an ester can make.
Deca is so terrible for some people mainly because they are sensitive to nandrolone, but also because Deca is so hard to get out of your system and it has a very pronounced cumulative effect.
Shooting 500mg of Deca a week, by the time it stabilises (w4-5) you have ~1300mg of actual nandrolone in your body
It took 4-5 weeks to reach stable blood levels and if you realise then that it's giving you too many problems, it takes a full 3-6 weeks to clear your system completely.
Most of us are limited to 200-300mg of Deca a week.
We say to newbies, do a 200mg of Deca a week. Good advice maybe, but the truth is, 200mg of deca shoot every week will build up quite a level of nandrolone in the body.
So 200-300mg of Deca a week is not a weak cycle. It's an inefficient, potent cycle, not comparable to 200-300mg of Test which is fairly weaker in terms of anabolism.
So what about NPP?
Almost a completely different drug, fast acting, you reach full level quickly and it clears quickly.
It allows you to bypass the waiting period and clearing period of deca (3-4 weeks at beginning and tail end of cycle) So you can get to the proper effective dose right away and you can control it since it is fast acting.
IMO, it's the best drug in terms of benefit/risk ratio I've ever used
Please elaborate ....Nelson Montana said:
I agree with every post on this thread, except this one.
No flame bro. Just a difference of opinion.
Nelson Montana said:Well, Deca is Deca. It's not unlike prop or cyp -- a short acting ester has advantages and disadvantages.
I disagree with Andy on several points.
First of all, the statement that it takes 4-5 weeks to "stabilize" is pure fantasy. There's no such thing.
Actually, I agree that 300 mgs of Deca is more anabolic than 300 ms of test.
NPP will clear more quickly, but enough metabolites can remain to test positive long afterward. (If that's a concern) I can't say for sure if it will be as long as decanoate. That's an interesting question. My guess is "probably not". At any rate, all the problems of Deca still exist.
The best risk/benefit ratio of any drug? I think it's one of the worst in regard to libido, which means everything to me, but apparently some guys have no problem sacrificing it. I don't get it. It used to be that guys got muscle so they can get MORE pussy. Now they get less pussy in order to get more muscle. When did everything go horribly wrong?
Yes that's exactly what I was thinking.Nelson Montana said:Okay Andy. That makes more sense to me. i don't agree entirely, but I see where you're coming from. And yes, a short acting ester up front is preferable. What do you stack the Deca with?
chaquito: If you have a problem deca, it will be the same, but the duration may not be as severe
Nelson Montana said:Well, Deca is Deca. It's not unlike prop or cyp -- a short acting ester has advantages and disadvantages.
I disagree with Andy on several points.
The ideas touched upon by BigAndy were, at one point, concepts that I introduced. And in this thread, I could not have expressed these any better myself. So disagreeing with BigAndy is disagreeing with me, as I would have replied with the same remarks. So, if I may, disect your response a little.....
First of all, the statement that it takes 4-5 weeks to "stabilize" is pure fantasy. There's no such thing.
Replace "to stabilize" with "to reach (accumulate) maximal theraputic blood levels, following weekly doses." Of course, there is no such 'ceiling' mathematically speaking, but the practial concept of such an event is undeniable.
Actually, I agree that 300 mgs of Deca is more anabolic than 300 ms of test.
Moot point.
NPP will clear more quickly, but enough metabolites can remain to test positive long afterward. (If that's a concern) I can't say for sure if it will be as long as decanoate.
I challenge you to show me that NPP is testable long after a cycle like deca is.
At any rate, all the problems of Deca still exist.
I disagree. I believe the problems associated with Deca (as far as recovery of natural testosterone) result directly from it's ester. Without having any data, I would guess that users of NPP probably do not experience such problems recovering natural testosterone. Although I believe that mg per mg, nandrolone is more inhibitory than testosterone, I feel this is a non-issue a month or two after a cycle.
Nelson Montana said:Okay Andy. That makes more sense to me. i don't agree entirely, but I see where you're coming from. And yes, a short acting ester up front is preferable. What do you stack the Deca with?
chaquito: If you have a problem deca, it will be the same, but the duration may not be as severe
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










