Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Shoot all the Judges

The judge probably wondered why the hell the other two branches were involved in this case in the first place.
 
JerseyArt said:
One guy, judge or not, was never intended to eb the final say on what is or isnt legal. As a practical matter we generally do allow the courts to determine legality, but they were never granted final say
The judges job is indeed to determine what is or what isnt legal. If Veggies parents want to keep her alive they need to either challenge who has say, or prove that it is illegal to remove the tube.
JA, please find the law that says the parents have say over spouse, or that it is illegal to remove the tube.
Thanks
 
JerseyArt said:
No maing

They clearly ordered a review of the case.

Only one judge has ever actually reviewed the facts of this case.

All that was demanded was that someone other than that one judge look at the facts of the case in total.

Regardless, this was law passed by the entire Congress of the US. How does this one asshole get to determine that he can ignore the other two branches in such a clear demand?

Nah, it was a fuck you
Hmmm, when you put it that way...seems like a "fuck you" to me.

No non-biased party is not looking at it? I find it funny given all the commotion that its causing; although I thought that others would be fearful for what their input and involvement could do to their careers...
 
JerseyArt said:
Childish statement which I'll excuse because...well...you are a child.

When you get older hopefully you'll begin to see the larger picture.

oh and like your thread title is any more mature than my statement.

quit being a goober.
 
jestros said:
The judges job is indeed to determine what is or what isnt legal. If Veggies parents want to keep her alive they need to either challenge who has say, or prove that it is illegal to remove the tube.
JA, please find the law that says the parents have say over spouse, or that it is illegal to remove the tube.
Thanks


Bor you don't even demonstrate enough knowledge of the case to comment.

For one thing the spouse doesnt have say over the parents on the matter. That isn't even what the courts decided.

What was decided was that seven years after she was already in this state her spouse suddenly recalled (even though ther is testimony from friends of his that claim he admitted to them that he lied which the courts wont review) she once told him she wouldnt wish to persist in this state should it ever happen. Her family in turn has said that was never her wish.

Further you keep mindlessly repeating "veggie" as if you had any understanding of the medical case. She hasnt even been examined in the last 3 years, not even so much as had an MRI to check her condition. A neurologist from the Mayo Clinic who examined her 3 weeks ago has offered sworn statements that she isnt in a permanent vegetitiatve state, and exhibits at least minimal consciousness.

The testimony saying she is in a vegetitative state comes from one doctor, and over 30 others have offered testimony questioning the assessment.

Stop mindlessly parroting silly statements which at best are suspect.

All that was ordered was a full review of the case. Were she a convicted criminal on death row no one would question her right to have all evidence heard prior to being put to death. But the same peopel who would be whining over that cant kill this woman fast enough
 
UA_Iron said:
The judge probably wondered why the hell the other two branches were involved in this case in the first place.


That's the point bor, no judge has the authority to make that determination. It is the purpose of the courts to help interpret law, not judge which laws should or shouldnt be considered by the other two branches.

It isnt his place to judge what they should or shouldnt be concerning themsleves with maing
 
The part I don't get is why all the interest in this case?

She's just one women who will forgotten by the next month when the new crisis looms.

None of us know exactly what happened and who said what, we're all getting our news second hand. None of us are involved.
 
EnderJE said:
Hmmm, when you put it that way...seems like a "fuck you" to me.

No non-biased party is not looking at it? I find it funny given all the commotion that its causing; although I thought that others would be fearful for what their input and involvement could do to their careers...


It is absolutely stunning.

But then again we have a compliant pro death media who keep repeatedly claiming among other things that this woman is in a coma and on life support, even though both statements are objectively false
 
I think this may be the perfect time to test the theory of natural selection?

j/k
 
JerseyArt said:
It is absolutely stunning.

But then again we have a compliant pro death media who keep repeatedly claiming among other things that this woman is in a coma and on life support, even though both statements are objectively false
I wouldn't know about that. I haven't been there to see for myself that she's in a coma or on life support.

I'm guessing that you don't either and are getting your news from a different source then the pro death media.
 
Top Bottom