Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Samoth: Let's Bring Some Rigor to This "TWERKIN" Thing
- Thread starter mrplunkey
- Start date
PICK3
New member
mrplunkey
New member
Sexually explicit dancing?
Yes.
Think of the underlying forcing function. It's practially a sinusiod. But the translation to the surface of the ass is translated motion -- with a phase shift. Zero to ninty degrees would be a really tight ass. Over 180 degrees would be seriously fat ass.
Consider this: The nay nay is going to move with the forcing function. Small phase shifts = good plowing. As the phase shift grows, it would come back into alignment around 360 degrees. My prediction is that a 180 degree twerkin shift would be bad lovings.
We may be able to explain why guys either like the small, lean booties or the fat, wobbly ones. There may be an underlying mathematical argument for why medium-size asses get no love.
I smell publication here.
PICK3
New member
mrplunkey
New member
I'm glad you chimed-in. As part of our funded research, guys with seriously long junk shouldn't mind if the booty is 180 degrees out of phase, cause they're just putting the tip in anyway.
I can cover the extra long case, but to be scientifically conclusive we're going to need a guy with a seriously short dick as a counter-example. You game? I know you don't like the vag, but would you make an exception in the name of science?
We define the twerking motion to be a periodic damped oscillating system, described as possessing the same fundamental characteristics as a sinusoidal function translated by pi/2. (Preliminary research quoted a pure sinusoid; however, this was intuitively impossible for such a system.) This is, of course, perfectly resonable, given that the cosine function at the initial stationary position x=0 is 1, not 0, as a sine function would give. Within such an isolated two-body dynamic system, we have found this to be an absolutely necessary condition for the initial {x=0,t=0} positive non-zero potential energy, K>0, required to initiate the wave function exactly when t>0; indeed, the sine function possessed no such potential energy and was found, interestingly enough, to represent the t=infinity case of our damped harmonic oscillator, viz. a zero-energy state. Furthermore, having satisfied the condition that y=1 at x=0, we must take into account that this is a priori an inverse function (for obvious reasons; the reader is encouraged to work this out for himself for verification of functional inversion at teh fulcrum), and are thus dealing with the cosine^-1 = secant function. Now, with the female, denoted here as "ass", possessing the greater potential energy at the topmost position, we take the inverse cosine as a function of position, arbitratily denoted here as "c", to get
sec(c) = ass
Although the subjects have found the discontinuity at pi/2 somewhat problematic, in virtually every case, asymptotic behaviors have been fully accounted for using Big O notation. We strongly feel our research merits further funding in order to conclude whether the sole function of sec(c)=ass is the Big O; and if not, to probe even deeper.
redsamurai
Banned
I can cover the extra long case
penis extenders don't count plunk, terribly sorry ole boy, you'll just have to dial up layinback to complete that segement of the research.
penis extenders don't count plunk, terribly sorry ole boy, you'll just have to dial up layinback to complete that segement of the research.
dude...
what??????????????
what??????????????
still confused
mrplunkey
New member
Samoth:
The hip sockets define an axis in three dimentional space. The measurement point for the forcing function is the top of the sacrum, just before its attachement to L5. When you watch a "twerkin" video now, notice the sinusoidal rise and fall of that point around the axis defined by the hip sockets.
Even though the vag is soft tissue, it's position relative to our reference point is fixed (which will suffice for this study). And the whole point of twerkin is to demonstrate sexual prowess by being able to "work it", correct?
So now think about the top layer of fat on the girl's ass. That's going to move as the underlying forcing function moves -- the ass is just a second-order damped system. Twerking is simply aligning the frequency of the forcing function with the natural frequency of girl's ass itself -- it's just a reasonant standing wave. Note that the forcing function can assume any integer multiple of the natural frequency as well (hence the girl would be "working it harder") -- but it still has to resonate or the ass is just wobbling chaotically.
Now back to our original discussion -- the phase. A small ass would be overdamped and the phase shift between the fat and the forcing function would be small. A big ass (i.e. "trunk love") would be severely underdamped and in theory could rock a full 360 degrees out of phase. So in both situations, a guy is going to like hitting it. But picture an underdamped ass that would be perfectly 180 degrees out of phase. As the vag thrusts toward the guy, the ass is going to shift down -- hence all your going to experience is a fat ass getting in the way.
Can you imagine being able to prove mathematically why some guys like small asses, others like fat ones but that medium-size asses get no love?
Samoth -- don't give up on this. There's a commercial play here too.
The hip sockets define an axis in three dimentional space. The measurement point for the forcing function is the top of the sacrum, just before its attachement to L5. When you watch a "twerkin" video now, notice the sinusoidal rise and fall of that point around the axis defined by the hip sockets.
Even though the vag is soft tissue, it's position relative to our reference point is fixed (which will suffice for this study). And the whole point of twerkin is to demonstrate sexual prowess by being able to "work it", correct?
So now think about the top layer of fat on the girl's ass. That's going to move as the underlying forcing function moves -- the ass is just a second-order damped system. Twerking is simply aligning the frequency of the forcing function with the natural frequency of girl's ass itself -- it's just a reasonant standing wave. Note that the forcing function can assume any integer multiple of the natural frequency as well (hence the girl would be "working it harder") -- but it still has to resonate or the ass is just wobbling chaotically.
Now back to our original discussion -- the phase. A small ass would be overdamped and the phase shift between the fat and the forcing function would be small. A big ass (i.e. "trunk love") would be severely underdamped and in theory could rock a full 360 degrees out of phase. So in both situations, a guy is going to like hitting it. But picture an underdamped ass that would be perfectly 180 degrees out of phase. As the vag thrusts toward the guy, the ass is going to shift down -- hence all your going to experience is a fat ass getting in the way.
Can you imagine being able to prove mathematically why some guys like small asses, others like fat ones but that medium-size asses get no love?
Samoth -- don't give up on this. There's a commercial play here too.
redsamurai
Banned
well plunkey I have to give you some credit.....this was the most useful thread you've ever started cause it caused me to find this.........
WSHH Bunny - SpicyJ (Twerkin It) Video
lol though at mainstream culture picking up on what strippers have been doing for decades...
Is that how you came about this Plunk? Did you ask that stripper on saturday what those amazing gyrations she was doing were called?
WSHH Bunny - SpicyJ (Twerkin It) Video
lol though at mainstream culture picking up on what strippers have been doing for decades...
Is that how you came about this Plunk? Did you ask that stripper on saturday what those amazing gyrations she was doing were called?
redsamurai
Banned
oh and me=god for having just brought the "rigor".....
chris302001
Banned
black people are so goddamned weird
lololo
mrplunkey
New member
We're on the brink of demonstrating mathematically that medium-sized booties are bad lovins.
1) Samoth and I are gonna get research grants.
2) We're going to get published.
3) Then we'll license our booty equalization technology that allows plastic surgeons to turn bad booties good.
Think about it... women of the future will get boob jobs, tummy tucks and then get tweaked for twerkin. We'll even include a little "T for T" logo on the chick's ass. That means she's good to go.
1) Samoth and I are gonna get research grants.
2) We're going to get published.
3) Then we'll license our booty equalization technology that allows plastic surgeons to turn bad booties good.
Think about it... women of the future will get boob jobs, tummy tucks and then get tweaked for twerkin. We'll even include a little "T for T" logo on the chick's ass. That means she's good to go.
Racist!
redsamurai
Banned
OMG that was disgusting.
if by disgusting you mean ragingly boner inducing, than yes....I agree. And I usually can't stand that kind of dancing nor the girls who usually engage in it........but that ass is like a snake charmer to a nigga! It just had me transfixed. I kind of wanted to her to stop moving it like she's spasticated and just hold it up to the camera while parting the goods.......but a quality find nonetheless.
This is now a KARMA THREAD!
*twerks*
