Saddam Martyrs on Steroids

[bumpo]

you know taht teh BBC is very liberal and has been a vocal anti-war proponent. It's owned by the government so there can't be any repercussions considering most government officials in england did not support the war.

You seem very anti-war anti-us and you seem to be basing your information on the BBC so I am just curious how informed you are?

 

[bumpo]

you know taht teh BBC is very liberal and has been a vocal anti-war proponent. It's owned by the government so there can't be any repercussions considering most government officials in england did not support the war.

You seem very anti-war anti-us and you seem to be basing your information on the BBC so I am just curious how informed you are? not saying that teh BBC is laying at all all ia m saying is that there views are skewed to teh left.

 

[DeepZenPill]

This post was originally about saddam's troops on steroids, and I don't really want to get into a political debate, but I need to just paste this from an article I read (maybe nytimes, i forget).

This was in response to Iraqis wondering if they should trust Bush:
"At that point, an elderly man, Sultan Mahdi, stepped forward to declaim that such ambivalence was an evasion. "For 75 years I have been alive, and I'll say this," he said. "If the Iraqi people loved Saddam Hussein, the American military wouldn't be able to last one day in Iraq. Not one day. We would attack them."

You have to realize this too, the armed majority of the Iraqi population is multiple times larger than our armed forces in their country. If these armed civilians wanted to resist the invasion, I believe they would.

Anyway... I debate this war every day, going to an incredibly liberal school, so let's get back to anabolics shall we?

 

[jacobswell]

you know taht teh BBC is very liberal and has been a vocal anti-war proponent. It's owned by the government so there can't be any repercussions considering most government officials in england did not support the war.

You seem very anti-war anti-us and you seem to be basing your information on the BBC so I am just curious how informed you are? not saying that teh BBC is laying at all all ia m saying is that there views are skewed to teh left.

i was using the example of the bbc because i know that many americans regard the bbc as reputable. i do not, and infact it has been accused by people from all quarters of being biased. i base my views on different news channels. i watch them all and then make up my mind. of course im not out there in iraq so i dont know what its like on the street. but all im saying is that most people seem to think they know what the iraqi people are thinking but we dont beccuase we are not the iraqi people. i find it insulting to my intelligence that people like bush keep telling me what they are thinking.

and im not anti ameican. im anti the present US president who wasnt even elected. it kinda throws the idea that saddam is the only one who fixes elections out of the window. if Bush was actually fighting to bring democracy to the world he would resign today. or have a re-election.

 

[bumpo]

and im not anti ameican. im anti the present US president who wasnt even elected. it kinda throws the idea that saddam is the only one who fixes elections out of the window. if Bush was actually fighting to bring democracy to the world he would resign today. or have a re-election.

all your credibility just went out the door, I was actually going to be accepting of your views, but obviously your a very biast person who is quite ignorant and it's quite sad.

 

[jacobswell]

Bro read the Michael Moore book "stupid white men" and learn how the election was really won. And then come back to me and spout in your puerile conformist drivel.

Calling me ignorant because I happen to dislike Bush shows how poor your argument is. I was suggesting that because GWB did not win the majority of votes in the president election that he was not the people’s choice. And if you had read your politics textbook, you would know the meaning of the word democracy is literally “people power.” Hence the people have no power because a guy they did not vote for is in power. Hence the win was not democratic. So fighting for “democracy” in Iraq as I have heard Bush say so many times is not only hypocritical when his election win was fixed, but it is insulting to our intelligence. But if one has no intelligence I guess it can’t be insulting to some.

 

[bumpo]

Micheal Moore haha your a fool! lmao thats the funniest thing I have heard in a longtime. You could have chosen anyone else and you chose Micheal moore. I think you should stick to bodybuilding bro because if you ever used that line with an intellectual crowd you would be laughed out the door.

oh by the way buddy american politics aren't decided on popular votes there decided on electoral votes that how the president is elected.

 

[Frackal]

what constitutes an intellectual crowd

 

[jubei]

This is all I have to say: Many Iraqi troops were on steroids. Those steroids did not have anyting to do with their behavior except they may be able to bench press 2 goats instead of one.

I am also very ashamed that Canada did not decide to assist the US forces, however the decision was not mine to make. It almost seems that "we" said no only to exercise our right to disagree. That being said I think our support of our closest allies would have bolstered the worlds view of the US led coalition in Iraq.

 

[Arias]

If anything I think meth was involved. Easy to make and easy to make fight. It originated in Japan in WWII. They would give their pilots that shit. It then went into the population. It took two A-Bombs to stop them. The only way those guys would benefit from AS is some Halo or similar. Either way, you don't go to a gun fight with a knife.............peace!

Arias