Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
F
Frackal
Guest
seeker02 said:
Hahahaha
Track marks from steroids?
Not.
Saddam Martyrs on Steroids
- Thread starter seeker02
- Start date
Hahahaha
Track marks from steroids?
Not.
H
HULKSTER
Guest
Once again, it's time to blame steroids........
British Bulldog
New member
Mods, delete or lock this thread. Read the title of the board please. This is a steroid discussion forum, not a political one. Ive seen many good boards go down the hill because of garbage post like this one.
I am almost positive that both Iraq and Iran use steroids in extensively the military. This being said, do I think that it is responsible for suicidal maniacs who strap bombs to themselves and run into US checkpoints? Of course not, only a complete idiot would come to that conclusion.
Hm well Sadaam is estimated to have killed rougly 20 million of his people while he has been in power. He has raped, and tortored many more I am sure. After seeing interviews with Iraqii's I think it is pretty clear Iraq is NOT pro Sadaam. Sure there are some, but most are very anti-Sadaam. Why else would they have been throwing their shoes at his statue when it came down? I know you said "that's just Baghdad" but if you have seen any of the interviews with Iraqii's and former Iraqii citizens living in the United States it is VERY apparrent that most hate the manjacobswell said:
DeepZenPill
New member
This article is really some bad propaganda. It's no good for the image of steroids and steroid users either. There is no concrete evidence of steroid use given in the article, and their weak evidence comes in the form of track marks, and some Colonel's assumption that the fundamentalist maniac had to have been on drugs.
First of all I've never heard of "track marks" being related to steroids. These guys could have been injected with a ton of different drugs which would be MUCH better suited for aggression and combat than steroids. SofaGeorge mentioned the likely use of Methamphetamine, which has been known to be used by combat forces. Shit, our OWN pilots were forced to use amphetamines in the recent years to be able to fly sorties at any hour of the day.
Then the comment about the nut who jumps on the tank doesn't mention steroids at all. Sure, the guy could have been on a whole host of drugs that might cause that behavior, but what about the thousands of other suicide bombers in the past and present? I can assure you that they were not ALL on drugs, most of them were just fucking insane. I don't know about you guys, but when I'm on, I don't get any urges to jump into certain death.
This kind of reporting is the bullshit that keeps juice so taboo. Now if you get caught with steroids, people are going to compare you to our suicide bomber enemies. Those terrible steroids are what drives people to hate America.
First of all I've never heard of "track marks" being related to steroids. These guys could have been injected with a ton of different drugs which would be MUCH better suited for aggression and combat than steroids. SofaGeorge mentioned the likely use of Methamphetamine, which has been known to be used by combat forces. Shit, our OWN pilots were forced to use amphetamines in the recent years to be able to fly sorties at any hour of the day.
Then the comment about the nut who jumps on the tank doesn't mention steroids at all. Sure, the guy could have been on a whole host of drugs that might cause that behavior, but what about the thousands of other suicide bombers in the past and present? I can assure you that they were not ALL on drugs, most of them were just fucking insane. I don't know about you guys, but when I'm on, I don't get any urges to jump into certain death.
This kind of reporting is the bullshit that keeps juice so taboo. Now if you get caught with steroids, people are going to compare you to our suicide bomber enemies. Those terrible steroids are what drives people to hate America.
jacobswell
New member
McBane said:
the highest estimate i have heard is 3 million but the standard one seems to be 1 million people that he has killed. but those estimates also tend to include the people in the iran and iraq war. so hardly his people then. im not justofying saddam but im saying that u cant guess that the majority of iraq is anti saddam becuase one photo op on the news has told you so. iraqi dissedents are likely to hate saddam, but they do not represent the whole iraqi population. much like saddam did not represent the whole iraqi population.
dude dont believe everything our governments or media tells you. its in their interests for them to sell you the idea of this war.
jacobswell
New member
McBane said:
the highest estimate i have heard is 3 million but the standard one seems to be 1 million people that he has killed. but those estimates also tend to include the people in the iran and iraq war. so hardly his people then. and they also include the 500,000 people who died from the US led UN sanctions on iraq. which many iraqi's still blame the US for. at least whats what the bbc says.
im not justifying saddam but im saying that u cant guess that the majority of iraq is anti saddam becuase one photo op on the news has told you so. iraqi dissedents are likely to hate saddam, but they do not represent the whole iraqi population. much like saddam did not represent the whole iraqi population.
dude dont believe everything our governments or media tells you. its in their interests for them to sell you the idea of this war. they are hardly likely to say to you that saddam is a lovely guy who treats people nicely when they go to war with him. the first casualty of war is the truth.
