Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

'RUBY RIDGE' the movie, on THE LIFETIME CHANNEL

distanced

New member
IT'S HOW I PICTURED IT. SEEMS BIASED, BUT I STILL SUPPORT THE ACTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT.

THOSE ARE SOME MESSED UP PEOPLE!
 
Just because they are "messed up" doesn't mean they are not entitled to their Constitutional rights, such as the 2nd amendment to bear arms. Furthemore, the man in question was not paying federal taxes. Guess what? The US Constitution states that the federal governmetn shall make no provision or institution for the collection of federal income tax.....thus, the IRS is an illegal construct, as per the US CONSTITUTION, of which it overrides any federal government action or policy that dictates that federal income tax should be collected.
 
distanced said:
full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and the murder of 12 people are not constitutional rights!

YES THEY ARE!!! THE 2nd amendment never stated what types of firearms that US Citizens would be limited to. It was only after the federal government, about 10 years ago, violated the US Constitution by banning automatic weapons. The 2nd amendment also allows for the formation of militias. How the hell are US citizens supposed to form a formidable militia if they can't own automatic or semi-automatic weapons, let alone other weaponry? The US government has purposely violated the 2nd amendment in order to rid Americans of their 2nd amendment right to bear arms, as well as form militias. The federal government wants total and complete domination over the people. But since you are a Marine, god forbid an employee of the federal government would listen to reason---as well as actually read the very same US Constitution that he was sworn to uphold and protect.

P.S.---The federal government is scared shitless of US citizens being able to form a formidable militia, because then it would keep their asses' in check, such as keeping them from creating such nonsense as the Patriot Act, which is being used to destroy even more Constitutional rights under the disguise of fighting terrorism.
 
HULKSTER said:
The US Constitution states that the federal governmetn shall make no provision or institution for the collection of federal income tax.....thus, the IRS is an illegal construct, as per the US CONSTITUTION, of which it overrides any federal government action or policy that dictates that federal income tax should be collected.

Not to be disrepectful, but you ought to better acquaint yourself with the US Constitution (specifically the 16th Amendment) before making claims like this.

Predicting your response...an amendment supercedes the original document.
 
HULKSTER said:


YES THEY ARE!!! THE 2nd amendment never stated what types of firearms that US Citizens would be limited to. It was only after the federal government, about 10 years ago, violated the US Constitution by banning automatic weapons. The 2nd amendment also allows for the formation of militias. How the hell are US citizens supposed to form a formidable militia if they can't own automatic or semi-automatic weapons, let alone other weaponry? The US government has purposely violated the 2nd amendment in order to rid Americans of their 2nd amendment right to bear arms, as well as form militias. The federal government wants total and complete domination over the people. But since you are a Marine, god forbid an employee of the federal government would listen to reason---as well as actually read the very same US Constitution that he was sworn to uphold and protect.

P.S.---The federal government is scared shitless of US citizens being able to form a formidable militia, because then it would keep their asses' in check, such as keeping them from creating such nonsense as the Patriot Act, which is being used to destroy even more Constitutional rights under the disguise of fighting terrorism.

I do, however, agree very much with your support of American's right to bear arms...
 
JibbyJabba said:


Not to be disrepectful, but you ought to better acquaint yourself with the US Constitution (specifically the 16th Amendment) before making claims like this.

Predicting your response...an amendment supercedes the original document.

However, the Amendment clause states that any amendment will not be abused by the federal government to oppress the people.
 
sure hulkster, so why don't we allow everyone to commit murder and own rpgs, wmd, sams, and aa guns, that would be great asshole
 
HULKSTER said:


YES THEY ARE!!! THE 2nd amendment never stated what types of firearms that US Citizens would be limited to. It was only after the federal government, about 10 years ago, violated the US Constitution by banning automatic weapons. The 2nd amendment also allows for the formation of militias. How the hell are US citizens supposed to form a formidable militia if they can't own automatic or semi-automatic weapons, let alone other weaponry? The US government has purposely violated the 2nd amendment in order to rid Americans of their 2nd amendment right to bear arms, as well as form militias. The federal government wants total and complete domination over the people. But since you are a Marine, god forbid an employee of the federal government would listen to reason---as well as actually read the very same US Constitution that he was sworn to uphold and protect.

P.S.---The federal government is scared shitless of US citizens being able to form a formidable militia, because then it would keep their asses' in check, such as keeping them from creating such nonsense as the Patriot Act, which is being used to destroy even more Constitutional rights under the disguise of fighting terrorism.

Honestly...not to disrespect the Constitution or anything...but the second amendmant is a fucking outdated piece of bullshit that people use to their advantage. The right to form militias?!?!?! This was written back in the day, when there would actually be a reason to form militias and carry firearms. Not for people in 2003 to carry full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and murder 12 people.

It pisses me off when people bring up the 2nd amendmant.
 
my point exactly Bulldog

Hulkster needs to finish his GED and move out of idaho or sault lake city or where ever he's from
 
HULKSTER said:


However, the Amendment clause states that any amendment will not be abused by the federal government to oppress the people.

Well... the representatives we voted into office are the ones who made the amendment - Not some trannical dictator - not the President (though he did approve it - had he vetoed it, that could have been overridden by Congress). If the 16th Amendment was considered an "abuse" by a majority of the voting citizenry, it would never have been proposed because congressman like to remain Congressman. If you want to abolish the federal income tax, you have a means of doing so. Organize with all those who agree with you and tell your Congressman that you will not vote for them unless they support an Amendement abolishing the IRS.

Unfortunately for you, not many people share your view of the IRS and it being an "abuse...to oppress people."
 
distanced said:
yeah sorry, I put it here by accident.

I was hoping a mod would notice and move it.

apologies again

Eh..who cares...the guys on the anaboard like to chat everyone now and again anyways. It's not like it takes up too much board space.
 
You guys are nuts. The constitution is like the damn holding back the sea of tyranny
 
the movie has completely changed its bias.

now they are really trying to make them look like victims.

the aryans kill enough people and they carry too many illegal arms for me to have pity on them.
 
Bulldog_10 said:


Honestly...not to disrespect the Constitution or anything...but the second amendmant is a fucking outdated piece of bullshit that people use to their advantage. The right to form militias?!?!?! This was written back in the day, when there would actually be a reason to form militias and carry firearms. Not for people in 2003 to carry full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and murder 12 people.

It pisses me off when people bring up the 2nd amendmant.

Why, because you hate the very US Constitution that gives you the right to express your opinion, even if it's hatred of certain aspects of the US Constitution itself?
 
Attention members !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Elite Fitness now has a new record !!!!!!!!!!!!

The award for 'most ignorant post' for the spring of 2003........

goes to........

Hulkster
 
Dial_tone said:
The constitution is outdated. Let's rewrite them with a clean slate.

So that means we should let fucked-up religous zealots like John Ashcroft, and oil-hungry, corporate puppets like George Bush and Dick Cheney---rewrite the Constitution? Because that's what it would come down to, especially with the majority of the House of Representatives being Republican, and Republicans technically in control of the Senate. AND AS A BLACK MAN, DIALTONE, you should be quite afraid of these conservative Southerners with their religious zealotry and "kill everyone, ask questions later" mentality to handling domestic and international problems. How do you think a rewritten US Constitution would work out for a black man like you? Do you want these old, ultra conservative crazy-crackers dictating how you should live?
 
distanced said:
Attention members !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Elite Fitness now has a new record !!!!!!!!!!!!

The award for 'most ignorant post' for the spring of 2003........

goes to........

Hulkster

And the record for the most posts in support of our mind controlling, hypocritical and tyrannical FEDERAL government goes to....what do you know.....a federal employee.....

DISTANCED!!!!
 
distanced said:
Hulkster has officially broke out his diesel backhoe to dig the hole he's in deeper

You said that shit last time.....nobody's busting me......there are far too many conservative people on EF who automatically use the "watch what you say, because the Feds are right outside your door" mentality to squash any critism of the federal government. So what would you do distanced, start threads on the Chat Forum talking about how great John Aschcroft is? Go ahead, because I'm leaving EF..........
 
There is no reason fo ryou to leave elite

you should just understand that when you make statements that people should be allowed to carry any weapons they like, that that would only cause our country to become more unsafe than it already is.

just think if anyone in the US could purchase grenades, rpgs, high explosive weapons etc at their local walmart.

that is a world I would not like to live in.
 
I don't think that people should be allowed to carry anything crazy, just M60's, M16 A2 rifles, hand grenades, some mortars, hollow-point bullets,artillery shells, etc. lol
 
Bulldog_10 said:


Honestly...not to disrespect the Constitution or anything...but the second amendmant is a fucking outdated piece of bullshit that people use to their advantage. The right to form militias?!?!?! This was written back in the day, when there would actually be a reason to form militias and carry firearms. Not for people in 2003 to carry full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and murder 12 people.

It pisses me off when people bring up the 2nd amendmant.
OK tard, let your federal government get so large and strong while the people have no power or say at all and you have....Communism.
 
distanced said:

that is a world I would not like to live in.

Because you are a pussy bleeding heart liberal. Everything you listed is obtainable to a motivated individual. Believe me when you are in a place where everyone is armed, you would be surprised how polite everyone is to each other. You are getting just like that crybaby Frackle.
 
What do you guys mean by "muredred 12 people" ??

and what's wrong with full auto weapons ? You think they're more effective ? lol RCMP's ERT don't even have full autos and from what I've heard they would take a semi-auto over a full anytime. Full autos are fun. Period.
 
Bulldog_10 said:


Honestly...not to disrespect the Constitution or anything...but the second amendmant is a fucking outdated piece of bullshit that people use to their advantage. The right to form militias?!?!?! This was written back in the day, when there would actually be a reason to form militias and carry firearms. Not for people in 2003 to carry full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and murder 12 people.

It pisses me off when people bring up the 2nd amendmant.

yes, because the government will take care of us, right?

How history-illiterate are you?
 
distanced said:
the movie has completely changed its bias.


It's a movie. Youcan pretty much throw objectivity out the window, because you're subject to media filters and sterilized presentation.
 
distanced said:
Hulkster has officially broke out his diesel backhoe to dig the hole he's in deeper

Are you really a federal employee?
 
distanced said:
full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and the murder of 12 people are not constitutional rights!

OK.. now I have seen.. read or heard it all!!!!

Please tell me who killed these 12 people?

Let me ask you a question.. do you know who the first person who was killed in that standoff was? Do you know what happened? Of course you don't, you saw a bullshit fucking movie.

Let me kick you some facts. The first person that was killed was a 14 year-old boy. The son of Randy Weaver. Let me tell you why he was killed. The FBI/US Marshall Service. sent snipers on the the land to stalk the Weavers. While they were out hunting, the dog spotted the agents. The dog began barking and as Sammy (the 14 year old) turned to look at the dog and what he was barking at.. the fucking agent shot the boys dog.. so the 14 year old Sammy fired a shot in the direction of the sniper and turned around and began running home. With his back to these brave agents.. they shot a 14 year old boy in the back.. while he was running away!!!

There is alot more to this story.. I do not have the time to write it all out here, but I will tell you this too, the FBI dragged that dog back up in front of the house and then ran it over again and again with their trucks... just to torture Weaver and his family.

So do not give me your bullshit story about how these people were crazy. There were no RPG's or fully auto weapons. I had 3 close friends arrested trying to bring these people food. (it is all in Weavers book) I know the real story on this one. All of you people that belive the lies they are telling you on your favorite TV channel or show need to compare stories to those from non-payed witnesses. Same with Waco, in both cases the media was kept at least 3 miles away and all reports were given by the government. So right there should tell you somthing.. if the news is allowed to go into a warzone and report in Iraq, Vietnam, Somalia and Kuwait... why would it be forbidden to see or hear what was going on at these two standoffs?

THINK!!!!
 
dballer said:


OK.. now I have seen.. read or heard it all!!!!

Please tell me who killed these 12 people?

Let me ask you a question.. do you know who the first person who was killed in that standoff was? Do you know what happened? Of course you don't, you saw a bullshit fucking movie.

Let me kick you some facts. The first person that was killed was a 14 year-old boy. The son of Randy Weaver. Let me tell you why he was killed. The FBI/US Marshall Service. sent snipers on the the land to stalk the Weavers. While they were out hunting, the dog spotted the agents. The dog began barking and as Sammy (the 14 year old) turned to look at the dog and what he was barking at.. the fucking agent shot the boys dog.. so the 14 year old Sammy fired a shot in the direction of the sniper and turned around and began running home. With his back to these brave agents.. they shot a 14 year old boy in the back.. while he was running away!!!

There is alot more to this story.. I do not have the time to write it all out here, but I will tell you this too, the FBI dragged that dog back up in front of the house and then ran it over again and again with their trucks... just to torture Weaver and his family.

So do not give me your bullshit story about how these people were crazy. There were no RPG's or fully auto weapons. I had 3 close friends arrested trying to bring these people food. (it is all in Weavers book) I know the real story on this one. All of you people that belive the lies they are telling you on your favorite TV channel or show need to compare stories to those from non-payed witnesses. Same with Waco, in both cases the media was kept at least 3 miles away and all reports were given by the government. So right there should tell you somthing.. if the news is allowed to go into a warzone and report in Iraq, Vietnam, Somalia and Kuwait... why would it be forbidden to see or hear what was going on at these two standoffs?

THINK!!!!

wow I'm speechless...
 
JibbyJabba said:


Not to be disrepectful, but you ought to better acquaint yourself with the US Constitution (specifically the 16th Amendment) before making claims like this.

Predicting your response...an amendment supercedes the original document.

"No legislative act … contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 78

"The Constitution allows only the means which are ‘necessary,’ not those which are merely ‘convenient,’ for effecting the enumerated powers. If such a latitude of construction be allowed to this phrase as to give any non-enumerated power, it will go to every one, for there is not one which ingenuity may not torture into a convenience in some instance or other, to some one of so long a list of enumerated powers. It would swallow up all the delegated powers, and reduce the whole to one power, as before observed" - Thomas Jefferson, 1791

The Constitution expressly denied the government the power to lay direct taxes on citizens. If you give the government the power to circumvent and obtain that power which they do not hold, then what benefit is it to even attempt to corall their power?

OH...I forget, the Constitution is an "organic" document
:p
 
Bulldog_10 said:


Honestly...not to disrespect the Constitution or anything...but the second amendmant is a fucking outdated piece of bullshit that people use to their advantage. The right to form militias?!?!?! This was written back in the day, when there would actually be a reason to form militias and carry firearms. Not for people in 2003 to carry full auto rifles, sawed of shot guns, explosives and murder 12 people.

It pisses me off when people bring up the 2nd amendmant.

It pisses me off when people are ignorant.
 
atlantabiolab said:


It pisses me off when people are ignorant.


No shit!! I cannot believe someone would say... "the second amendment is an outdated piece of fucking bullshit"

It is hard to just comprehend that one.
 
dballer said:


OK.. now I have seen.. read or heard it all!!!!

Please tell me who killed these 12 people?

Let me ask you a question.. do you know who the first person who was killed in that standoff was? Do you know what happened? Of course you don't, you saw a bullshit fucking movie.

Let me kick you some facts. The first person that was killed was a 14 year-old boy. The son of Randy Weaver. Let me tell you why he was killed. The FBI/US Marshall Service. sent snipers on the the land to stalk the Weavers. While they were out hunting, the dog spotted the agents. The dog began barking and as Sammy (the 14 year old) turned to look at the dog and what he was barking at.. the fucking agent shot the boys dog.. so the 14 year old Sammy fired a shot in the direction of the sniper and turned around and began running home. With his back to these brave agents.. they shot a 14 year old boy in the back.. while he was running away!!!

There is alot more to this story.. I do not have the time to write it all out here, but I will tell you this too, the FBI dragged that dog back up in front of the house and then ran it over again and again with their trucks... just to torture Weaver and his family.

So do not give me your bullshit story about how these people were crazy. There were no RPG's or fully auto weapons. I had 3 close friends arrested trying to bring these people food. (it is all in Weavers book) I know the real story on this one. All of you people that belive the lies they are telling you on your favorite TV channel or show need to compare stories to those from non-payed witnesses. Same with Waco, in both cases the media was kept at least 3 miles away and all reports were given by the government. So right there should tell you somthing.. if the news is allowed to go into a warzone and report in Iraq, Vietnam, Somalia and Kuwait... why would it be forbidden to see or hear what was going on at these two standoffs?

THINK!!!!

DBaller, what the hell are you doing bringing the truth into this thread? It was so much better when it was based on the TV show, which we all know only show the "facts".

Also, wasn't Randall Weaver's wife shot dead, holding her baby in her arms?

On a side note: is it just me that wonders why the government uses such deadly force on people who are of no major concern to the social welfare, yet people on VISA's here in the US, from nations known to promote terrorists, are not deported during a time of war?
 
so you agree that the aryan's should be allowed to have any weapons they like and not be monitored by the government despite their hate crimes and murders

what about if a group of HUGE anti-gay people start stockpiling food and weapons, have huge anti gay rallies that often turn violent, the occassional murder of some 'fags', and the sale of illegel weapons......oh, wait....that is the aryans
 
atlantabiolab said:


DBaller, what the hell are you doing bringing the truth into this thread? It was so much better when it was based on the TV show, which we all know only show the "facts".

Also, wasn't Randall Weaver's wife shot dead, holding her baby in her arms?

On a side note: is it just me that wonders why the government uses such deadly force on people who are of no major concern to the social welfare, yet people on VISA's here in the US, from nations known to promote terrorists, are not deported during a time of war?

hahaha...

Yes Vicky Weaver's face was completley shot off by a US Marshall's sniper rifle while she was holding an infant in her arms. The bone fragments from her jaw hit and injured Kevin Harris. This was more of what I said I did not want to get into because of time. But I am glad that someone else knows what really happened. What pisses me off the most is not the people who do not believe.. because they were raised to believe the TV so it is not their fault... but what pisses me off are the folks that do know about actions such as these, but forget about them months after they happen. This should have called for a complete govermental overhaul or a coup de tea`(spelling)
 
Dial_tone said:
The constitution is outdated. Let's rewrite them with a clean slate.

all though it is outdated but there is a ton that still should be there like the rights to a speedy trial which never happens.
 
distanced said:
so you agree that the aryan's should be allowed to have any weapons they like and not be monitored by the government despite their hate crimes and murders

what about if a group of HUGE anti-gay people start stockpiling food and weapons, have huge anti gay rallies that often turn violent, the occassional murder of some 'fags', and the sale of illegel weapons......oh, wait....that is the aryans


Can you please post up some articles on.. or proof of these murders.. and violent anti-gay rallies that you keep bringing up? How about 3 or so? (I bet you cannot do it!!)

Do you know who commits the most hate crimes in the US? (Hint: it is not the so called "Aryans")
 
distanced said:
so you agree that the aryan's should be allowed to have any weapons they like and not be monitored by the government despite their hate crimes and murders

what about if a group of HUGE anti-gay people start stockpiling food and weapons, have huge anti gay rallies that often turn violent, the occassional murder of some 'fags', and the sale of illegel weapons......oh, wait....that is the aryans

I have no problem with an Aryan group or anti-gay group stockpilling full autos as long as none of them as been convicted for a violent crime or something related with firearms.
 
Darktooth said:
The ATF entrapped Weaver for having an illegal shotgun. Weaver doesn't show up to court, consequently, he goes under the surveilance of 400+ federal agents. The agents kill the dog, Sammy gets shot, Weaver's friend kills the Marshall in retaliation, then Vicki is killed. I think that's how it went.

Also, was the federal government even allowed to tresspass on Weaver's land?

Personally, I think the federal government just fucked up big time. This was yet another great debacle in government conduct. There was taunting by the agents too, very unprofessional. I think they said something like "what did you have for breakfast, Mrs Weaver?" after she was dead. Disgusting.


There are great people in the federal government, but the incompetent ones should not have a place working there, because something is wrong if innocent people are killed.



Also, if I am missing or misinterpreting anything, please point them out. Thanks

This is about right.. in a nutshell.

there was alot of that taunting that you spoke of. All in all you pretty much hit the nail on the head though.
 
Well.. no Manny.. there is nothing missing.

What if I were to also tell you that the agent asked Weaver to saw off the barrel of the shotgun before selling it to him. Weaver asked why he would want to do that to a perfectly good shotgun? The agent then told him to saw it off before he would buy it!!!!

In other words, these guys really wanted him bad. To set up a crack team and go up into a remote northern part of Idaho and stormtroop some skinny old man and his family.... cause the did not want to be a part of the NWO??? :rolleyes:
 
jwill3:16 said:


all though it is outdated but there is a ton that still should be there like the rights to a speedy trial which never happens.

This concept of "outdated" is thrown around alot, can anyone elaborate on which parts are "outdated"?
 
They were victims.... How is it alright to shoot a an unarmed woman who is holding a baby.

Thats is fucked up shit...

By the way, Randy Weaver is my uncle... Not bullshitting.
 
distanced said:
so you agree that the aryan's should be allowed to have any weapons they like and not be monitored by the government despite their hate crimes and murders

what about if a group of HUGE anti-gay people start stockpiling food and weapons, have huge anti gay rallies that often turn violent, the occassional murder of some 'fags', and the sale of illegel weapons......oh, wait....that is the aryans

Thats s just dumb, he was stockpiling weapons huh???

I suppose that him and his wife and kids were going to go on a killing spree huh?

Its not like they had a damn army up there and were plotting shit.

I see Randy Weavr about 6 times a year, I admit that he is a little extreme, and his beliefs are not the norm, but in no way did he deserve to have his child killed and wife shot while she was holding an infant child.
 
distanced said:
IT'S HOW I PICTURED IT. SEEMS BIASED, BUT I STILL SUPPORT THE ACTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT.
I'm scared of you.

"The government" in this case watched a few to many 1970's police shows prior to acting.
 
addickt said:
They were victims.... How is it alright to shoot a an unarmed woman who is holding a baby.

Thats is fucked up shit...

By the way, Randy Weaver is my uncle... Not bullshitting.

If this is truth.. I want you to know that the guys that were busted and hog-tied by the FBI and ATF coming up the backside of that mountain were some of my good friends. I lived with all of them before I moved out to Colorado. If I did not live out there I would have been with them. If he is your uncle.. you should be more outspoken. Also proud that you have such a strong and truthful man in your family.
 
Top Bottom