Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

**PURE Ecdysterone: Mother Nature's Favorite STEROID!**

Status
Not open for further replies.
My google fu must be weak...I tried several of the listed references, and all I got were ads for folk selling similar products who list the exact same studies that SSE uses. A little help here please....
 
LMAO....Good one.
Tatyana said:
That you are, I found this pic on your site.

Looking good

untitled-1.jpg
 
jeff3vvv said:
My google fu must be weak...I tried several of the listed references, and all I got were ads for folk selling similar products who list the exact same studies that SSE uses. A little help here please....

Try google scholar, I have found a few that way.

That is if you don't have an account with an educational/scientific institution, you do get more full paper if you use Pubmed or Data star, and old archived articles on Ovid/Athens.
 
Tatyana said:
Try google scholar, I have found a few that way.

That is if you don't have an account with an educational/scientific institution, you do get more full paper if you use Pubmed or Data star, and old archived articles on Ovid/Athens.

Thanks, I'll try them latter. When you said you've found a few, did you mean for this product? If you've seen them, I believe you. I just couldn't find anything that looked like something other than an advertisement.
 
Tatyana said:
Would you mind posting links Ross?

Your citations are a little bit less than desireable, they don't really follow the proper scientific protocol for people to be able to check them out for themselves.

i doubt you will ever see links to his theories
 
I didn't read the wholw 5 pages but can this shit be suppressive?
 
DJ_UFO said:
I didn't read the wholw 5 pages but can this shit be suppressive?

Nope, that is one major reason why Ecdysterone is "Mother Nature's favorite steroid". :)
 
Ross said:
Nope, that is one major reason why Ecdysterone is "Mother Nature's favorite steroid". :)

not supressive because "ecdysteroids are completely innocuous in mammals"

"Identification of ligands and coligands for the ecdysone-regulated gene switch."
Saez E, Nelson MC, Eshelman B, Banayo E, Koder A, Cho GJ, Evans RM.

The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

The presence of ecdysone molecules in the plant kingdom is nearly universal. Plants use ecdysteroids as natural insecticides, [B]yet ecdysteroids are completely innocuous in mammals[/B]. Despite their steroidal skeleton, they have no teratogenic, sex-hormonal, anabolic, or analgesic properties. Moreover, humans consume large amounts of dietary ecdysteroids without such effects. For example, fresh spinach contains over 100 µg/g of 20-hydroxyecdysone. In rats, daily administration of 2 g/kg of ecdysteroid for 35 days has no effect on serum chemistry or organ weight. Ingested ecdysteroids survive the acidic conditions of the stomach, are quickly taken up, are promptly removed from the bloodstream, and are disposed of primarily through biliary excretion into the intestine.
found on
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/bodybuilding-supplements/finally-truth-about-ecdysterone-689.html
 
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2006, 3:19-27doi:10.1186/1550-2783-3-2-19

Effects of Methoxyisoflavone, Ecdysterone, and Sulfo-Polysaccharide Supplementation on Training Adaptations in Resistance-Trained Males
Colin D Wilborn1, Lemuel W Taylor2, Bill I Campbell3, Chad Kerksick4, Chris J Rasmussen3, Michael Greenwood3 and Richard B Kreider3


Ecdysterone (20-Beta-Hydroxyecdysterone) is a plant sterol that has also been linked to some bold claims including promotion of protein synthesis, maintenance of anabolic state, and enhancement of lean muscle mass, while subsequently decreasing adipose tissue. .......... Despite these potential benefits, no research has supported these claims in human models.


Despite the success in rodents, human models have not been as successful in increasing body mass and muscle mass


http://www.jissn.com/content/3/2/19
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom