Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
You'll often see these two drugs compared in steroid profiles. Both produce lean gains, both are hard on the hairline, both have low side effects, neither one aromatizes -- SAME THING, right?
They couldn't be more different.
This is just another case of "bro-babble." Primo and Mast are actually OPPOSITES.
Primo is pure anabolic, with very low androgenic properties. That means it pretty much is a pure muscle builder. This is hard for people to their head around because Primo is considered so weak. They compare water weight with size and Primo does not produce water weight. It's pure muscle. Unfortunately, it takes time to grow an ounce of muscle. This is why people think it "take time" for Primo to "kick in." It's all skewed thinking based on conflation and misconception. It's the "the earth looks flat, therefore it must be flat" way of thinking.
Now Mast is almost entirely androgenic, with almost no anabolic properties. In other words, Masteron does next to nothing in regard to growing muscle! What Masterom will do is make you hard, vascular and defined. This is another reason why both of these drugs are used in "cutters" or lean bulk cycles, but it isn't so much a matter of fat burning properties, it really just the "appreaance " of leanness, and in that regard, Masteron kicks Primobolan's ass. I suspect it's a fave of celeb types who want to look buffed fast without too much bulk.
Also, the results from Primo are long lasting, the results from Mast are very temporary.
One area where they do work well together is when used together to produce a super polished look. But it'll cost ya. Both compounds are on the pricy side.
I hear people comparing EQ to Primo as well , and again, it's nothing like real Primo. Maybe because it's used as "fake Primo" nobody knows the difference.
So when giving (or hearing) advice about Primo and Mast being "cutters" don't believe it. They work on entirely different principles and should be used accordingly.
They couldn't be more different.
This is just another case of "bro-babble." Primo and Mast are actually OPPOSITES.
Primo is pure anabolic, with very low androgenic properties. That means it pretty much is a pure muscle builder. This is hard for people to their head around because Primo is considered so weak. They compare water weight with size and Primo does not produce water weight. It's pure muscle. Unfortunately, it takes time to grow an ounce of muscle. This is why people think it "take time" for Primo to "kick in." It's all skewed thinking based on conflation and misconception. It's the "the earth looks flat, therefore it must be flat" way of thinking.
Now Mast is almost entirely androgenic, with almost no anabolic properties. In other words, Masteron does next to nothing in regard to growing muscle! What Masterom will do is make you hard, vascular and defined. This is another reason why both of these drugs are used in "cutters" or lean bulk cycles, but it isn't so much a matter of fat burning properties, it really just the "appreaance " of leanness, and in that regard, Masteron kicks Primobolan's ass. I suspect it's a fave of celeb types who want to look buffed fast without too much bulk.
Also, the results from Primo are long lasting, the results from Mast are very temporary.
One area where they do work well together is when used together to produce a super polished look. But it'll cost ya. Both compounds are on the pricy side.
I hear people comparing EQ to Primo as well , and again, it's nothing like real Primo. Maybe because it's used as "fake Primo" nobody knows the difference.
So when giving (or hearing) advice about Primo and Mast being "cutters" don't believe it. They work on entirely different principles and should be used accordingly.
Last edited:
