Plunkey ... plz explain

[mrplunkey]

1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.


2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.

1) I changed the search criteria to "Public and Manditory Spending" (your choice)

2) I changed the year to 2010 (your choice).

And you were still dead wrong.

This is fun. What's next? Should we shift over to the CyberCollege data?

 

[75th]

1) I changed the search criteria to "Public and Manditory Spending" (your choice)

2) I changed the year to 2010 (your choice).

And you were still dead wrong.

This is fun. What's next? Should we shift over to the CyberCollege data?

loolollololollo @ uber-spin. Search this thread for where I said 2010.

Here's whats awesome:

1) You thought that choosing ONLY public spending and focusing ONLY on one single year proved your point.

or

2) You thought someone much smarter than you wouldnt notice if you did so.

Either way youre a fucking moron.

Now that youve conceded by changing the search parameters to include all spending, I'm inclined to think it was #1.

I wont bother asking as you obviously have difficulty answering simple questions.

 

[mrplunkey]

loolollololollo @ uber-spin. Search this thread for where I said 2010.

Here's whats awesome:

1) You thought that choosing ONLY public spending and focusing ONLY on one single year proved your point.

or

2) You thought someone much smarter than you wouldnt notice if you did so.

Either way youre a fucking moron.

Now that youve conceded by changing the search parameters to include all spending, I'm inclined to think it was #1.

I wont bother asking as you obviously have difficulty answering simple questions.

Has it even occurred to you to stop digging?

Have you not figured out yet that this is my EF thing?

I let RedScam(TM) write something stupid, then I call him out. Then, instead of him wising-up and saving his powder for another day, he just keeps digging deeper and deeper. I'm taking advantage of the fact that his anger and loss of perspective unhinges him.

And tonight, I'm doing it to you. Notice how conveniently he's bowed-out of this thread? When he posted that Ireland's social spending is only 13.9% of GDP, didn't it set off something in your head? It should have, but your desire to jump on me exceeded your ability to think through something you should have caught early.

And here's the best part: I'll occasionally type-out this explanation in detail. I'll even spell-out how and what I do. But alas, within days he'll take the bait.

You're better than this. I'll concede that. Just sleep this one off and maybe you can get me next time.

 

[75th]

loolloollool more of the same. I appreciate you admitting that being wrong and bending over backwards to spin your way out of it is your "EF thing." Just answer these two question, mkay pumpkin? Itll take you just a few seconds. They're yes or no. Once I have your answers on the record Ill leave you to lick your wounds and start another thread about redsams vibrams or something more up your alley.

1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.


2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.

 

[PICK3]

Just sleep this one off and maybe you can get me next time.

maybe knot

 

[75th]

maybe knot

He's so transparent. He knows he's wrong. If he thought for a moment he had a leg to stand on he would be hounding me with follow up questions, asking me to explain things further, etc.* Instead, he's begging me to leave him alone.

Apparently his "EF thing" is extremely important to him.



*Much like Im doing to him right now.

 

[PICK3]

He's so transparent. He knows he's wrong. If he thought for a moment he had a leg to stand on he would be hounding me with follow up questions, asking me to explain things further, etc.* Instead, he's begging me to leave him alone.

Apparently his "EF thing" is extremely important to him.



*Much like Im doing to him right now.

bro, you just let your emotions get the best of you, no shame ... it happens to the best of us

you perceived Plunkey's endless p'wnage of RS as "mean spirited" and wanted to stand up for the dysfunctional one. A worthy endeavor, but hardly a realistic feat being as your dependent friend's argument had no factual foundation (as usual).

you, have to understand RS actually likes the p'wnage ... or any attention

nice try considering the material you had to work with though

 

[75th]

bro, you just let your emotions get the best of you, no shame ... it happens to the best of us

you perceived Plunkey's endless p'wnage of RS as "mean spirited" and wanted to stand up for the dysfunctional one. A worthy endeavor, but hardly a realistic feat being as your dependent friend's argument had no factual foundation (as usual).

you, have to understand RS actually likes the p'wnage ... or any attention

nice try considering the material you had to work with though

lol @ the grammar and punctuation. Kudos.

Im not about defending redsam. He's an adult.

Its tough to turn down an easy opportunity to embarrass plunkey though.

 

[PICK3]

Its tough to turn down an easy opportunity to embarrass plunkey though.

Stay optimistic. It may happen one day.





knot really

 

[PICK3]

Im not about defending redsam. He's an adult.

and you well know I was speaking in terms of his "capacity", knot his chronological age