Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Partial deadlifts in smith machine

The problem with smith for deadlifts is that the bar doesn't follow a linear path during a normal deadlift. Can you do partial deadlifts off the pins in a power rack?
 
Yep, partials in a power rack would be much better, and will give you more carry over to full ROM deads once your ankle is better...
 
Power racks are not something you find in most Norwegian gyms. So thats not a possibility. And my smith machine isnt even straight. it goes at an angle, of all things.
 
just put plates under each side of the barbell....you can go as high or low as you like, and this would be much more effective than the smith
 
MrMuscle said:

...because i cant do regular deadlifts yet because of an ankle injury.

With an injury...do what you can and don't cause another injury.

Do what it takes to get back to regular deads...

B True
 
casualbb said:
The problem with smith for deadlifts is that the bar doesn't follow a linear path during a normal deadlift. Can you do partial deadlifts off the pins in a power rack?
I always feel like I'm nagging, but what path does it follow if it's not linear?
 
The new smiths are made to go up and back at an angle. They advertise it as "the natural motion" of your lift. Instead of straight up it goes about 6 inches to the back by the end of the movement.


edit I`ve never measured it to be 6 inches . just a guess.
 
gonelifting said:
The new smiths are made to go up and back at an angle. They advertise it as "the natural motion" of your lift. Instead of straight up it goes about 6 inches to the back by the end of the movement.


edit I`ve never measured it to be 6 inches . just a guess.

i wonder who they used as a model for said motion. definitely not a PL'er. i think they are thinking of just using the "J" path model, but cutting through a straight line instead.

hatfield is endorsing one that travels on an arc. very strange indeed. no substitute for the simplicity of a bar with no counterbalancing, limiting travel path, annoying hooks, or waiting for the full body king to finish his smith machine workout. :D
 
pwr_machine said:
:confused: I'm only familiar with a linear, vertical bar path.

although slight, the bar does move a little toward the lifter....although this is not enough to notice visually it is enough to make a difference and throw you off when using the smith
 
IronLion said:


although slight, the bar does move a little toward the lifter....although this is not enough to notice visually it is enough to make a difference and throw you off when using the smith


That`s the whole idea behind the smith that goes up and back. It goes in a straight line, but back toward the lifter. If you look at the machine from the side view, you see the bars going from left to right (although slightly) verticle.

I guess this is the "improved" design.

PS just in case... don`t kill the messenger. lol
 
IronLion said:


although slight, the bar does move a little toward the lifter....although this is not enough to notice visually it is enough to make a difference and throw you off when using the smith
Found this article for those interested. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 250–255.
"Biomechanical Analysis of the Deadlift".

It includes a biomechanical analysis of both conventional and sumo style deadlifts. In the sumo stance that I was referring to, it does appear the bar moves about 3 cm closer to the individual. It's quite a bit different with conventional lifters.

Most importantly, keep the bar close to your body and traveling as vertical as possible as this reduces lever arm distance and thus the resistive torque.
 
Top Bottom