Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

nangiggles depreciation thread

nangiggles

  • appreciate

    Votes: 21 63.6%
  • depreciate

    Votes: 11 33.3%
  • mehciate

    Votes: 1 3.0%

  • Total voters
    33
actually, what happened here is you (sub) made this thread attacking/calling out/making fun of Nan. Were you retaliating against her for something else? I don't know. Either way, she never called you ugly. Both you and CW came in here with derogatory comments, the first comment she made was:

"I think CW and subz are just upset I never mentioned them in the good looking bros thread..... "

And from that, the two of you unfairly unleashed your fury on her. She never called you ugly. She never called you anything. You guys got defensive and started going ballistic. It's pretty pathetic.
 
actually, what happened here is you (sub) made this thread attacking/calling out/making fun of Nan. Were you retaliating against her for something else? I don't know. Either way, she never called you ugly. Both you and CW came in here with derogatory comments, the first comment she made was:

"I think CW and subz are just upset I never mentioned them in the good looking bros thread..... "

And from that, the two of you unfairly unleashed your fury on her. She never called you ugly. She never called you anything. You guys got defensive and started going ballistic. It's pretty pathetic.

if you think that isnt an underhanded attack at our appearance then im going to make a smurfy depreciation thread.

its basically her saying "o ya well guess what i dont think youre good looking so there".

this thread was about her as a poster, not as a fleshy human. why is it pathetic for us to reverse the looks comments on her, but not for her to be mean to us about it?

anyway, like i said, this thread is getting gay, and was mostly a joke to make fun of nan for being a bad poster, not to tear her apart as a human being. but c'mon smurfy
 
well you guys over reacted (especially CW) by referring to her as an overweight midget troll or whatever he said. and posting that video and then laughing? she never once called either of you names. I mean, let's face it, Nan is about the most easy going poster on this forum.
 
well you guys over reacted (especially CW) by referring to her as an overweight midget troll or whatever he said. and posting that video and then laughing? she never once called either of you names. I mean, let's face it, Nan is about the most easy going poster on this forum.

nan is kewl, i like the gal ..but i felt that was fair comeback by them

you call someone out on their looks.. u should expect them to comeback hard.. the topic they were debating had nothing to even do with looks..that was an obvious attempt at a low blow
 
just for the record I meant to say they were butthurt over me not mentioning them, also if I didnt mention them it's because I forgot, cant mention every single poster, also sorry for calling you ugly directly CW I just lashed out at the vid, I dont think either of you bros are ugly. FOR THE RECORD im not mad at anyone here and as per me the thread needs no locking, its the interwebz so lets keep it fun :)
 
Top Bottom