my theory on women - thoughts?

[1_more_rep]

though i have not lived as long as many of you, i have compiled many thoughts about women into a simple point system.

All women created have a maximum of 10 points to spend on the scale:

scale:

extremely nice,-------------------------------------so so sexy,
intellectual, cares about looks alot,
classy, loving, conceited, mean
doesnt care about looks


my system is that women have 10 points to spend on this scale. Some use all 10 points to the left and are very nice caring ladies that don't care about looks and are sweethearts . Some ladies are so sooooooo hot but don't really care about much else. And the ones that usually have bfs spend 5 in each slot . so theyre almost always taken.

do you guys/girls agree that using this rubric you can categorize almost any woman?

example: id say FG was 6 on the left scale for being nice, etc. and about 4 for looks and caring about hotness

have i cracked the female complexity code?!

 

[gotmilk]

FG will kill you for the 4 rating.

 

[foreigngirl]

though i have not lived as long as many of you, i have compiled many thoughts about women into a simple point system.

All women created have a maximum of 10 points to spend on the scale:

scale:

extremely nice,-------------------------------------so so sexy,
intellectual, cares about looks alot,
classy, loving, conceited, mean
doesnt care about looks


my system is that women have 10 points to spend on this scale. Some use all 10 points to the left and are very nice caring ladies that don't care about looks and are sweethearts . Some ladies are so sooooooo hot but don't really care about much else. And the ones that usually have bfs spend 5 in each slot . so theyre almost always taken.

do you guys/girls agree that using this rubric you can categorize almost any woman?

example: id say FG was 6 on the left scale for being nice, etc. and about 4 for looks and caring about hotness

have i cracked the female complexity code?!

I dont need to care about showing my hotness to an internet board.
All I care about is how my husband looks at me

 

[Sweet_Bitch]

Is the point of the scale for woman to catagorize men or for men to catagorize woman?

 

[awittyusername]

I rate women on the number of drinks it takes me to have sex with them

 

[nycgirl]

1 rep, you are too much.

 

[1_more_rep]

FG will kill you for the 4 rating.

the point of my scale is that there is no GOOD or BAD rating. You can simply categorize all women based on this common table.

she has a pretty GOOD rating actually if you want to call it that. in my opinion she is 60% super nice n not cocky or anything n id say 40% bout her looks, etc. but if i slowed down to rate her more i'd probably put 7-3. I just rated her since she's the first name to pop in my head.

 

[1_more_rep]

Is the point of the scale for woman to catagorize men or for men to catagorize woman?

for men and women to categorize women. since we all know women are so hard to figure anyways so the scale makes it easier to understand why and how a particular woman does stuff that she does.

 

[foreigngirl]

the point of my scale is that there is no GOOD or BAD rating. You can simply categorize all women based on this common table.

she has a pretty GOOD rating actually if you want to call it that. in my opinion she is 60% super nice n not cocky or anything n id say 40% bout her looks, etc. but if i slowed down to rate her more i'd probably put 7-3. I just rated her since she's the first name to pop in my head.

why dont we rate you for a change?

 

[GoldenDelicious]

i categorise chicks on how many times i can bench their bodyweight

 

[Megalomaniac]

tell me you have only got bad karma for this thread please!

 

[foreigngirl]

I was about to say no more K for 1 more rep

 

[1_more_rep]

why dont we rate you for a change?

ok



::crosses fingers for good rating::

rate me with this scale or how? you can if you want. But i don't know how accurate it will be if you go by my true self. I might surprise some going on the scale (in a good way i think)

 

[Sub-Zero]

1 rep, you are too much.

of a fag.


sorry i had to finish the sentence for you

 

[1_more_rep]

tell me you have only got bad karma for this thread please!

wait why? what did i say/do wrong?

 

[Sub-Zero]

why dont we rate you for a change?

dont go there, you girls judge us 20x as much as we judge you, quit taking the high and mighty stance it gets older than old milk

 

[theoak01]

Fg is a 8 minimum fuckers,shes a red headed godess

 

[foreigngirl]

dont go there, you girls judge us 20x as much as we judge you, quit taking the high and mighty stance it gets older than old milk

but I never rated you bad. Your aunt did

 

[1_more_rep]

Fg is a 8 minimum fuckers,shes a red headed godess

omg another misunderstanding!

an 8 is NOT a good rating, a 10 is a HORRIBLE rating because you are an extreme and not an average. 10 means you are either TOO nice and naive and caring and innocent. 10 on the other side means you ONLY care about looks and don't care for anyone but yourself and how you look, etc.

so when i say someone is 6/4 that's a GOOD thing (with a 6 in caring/niceness being a little higher which is ALSO a good thing) damnit it's hard to explain stuff online correctly i guess

 

[Megalomaniac]

Are you serious? I'm not even in this thead anymore it's a no win sit. I try to fight when I can win, there is more to gain that way. C-ya.

 

[foreigngirl]

I dont understand it either

 

[theoak01]

omg another misunderstanding!

an 8 is NOT a good rating, a 10 is a HORRIBLE rating because you are an extreme and not an average. 10 means you are either TOO nice and naive and caring and innocent. 10 on the other side means you ONLY care about looks and don't care for anyone but yourself and how you look, etc.

so when i say someone is 6/4 that's a GOOD thing (with a 6 in caring/niceness being a little higher which is ALSO a good thing) damnit it's hard to explain stuff online correctly i guess

lol you complicate shit more then women do

 

[1_more_rep]

I dont understand it either

ok the whole point of this sounded better when i thought of it to myself before posting it. i meant to show a scale where you could categorize people into how they are from saying how many pts out of 10 they deserve for niceness, caring, non-superficiality, and then how many remaining pts/10 for how caring they are about looks, the outside in people, etc.

i guess it's not working like i'd think.

i am a 7/3 if i had to rate myself.

70% of me cares about all people and i am really nice and i dont care about looks i dont care if you're hot or not i can still like you

30% of me cares about what I look like and think like and how others i am with look, etc.

it was just a kinda personality scale gone bad. sorry fg shoulda used a different example since i don't know you well enough to have used you .

 

[hanselthecaretaker]

Women are an enigma of sorts. When you realize this, you will have "figured" them out.

 

[Raina]

I don't think it should be that hard. If it's the right person no scales are needed. Everything just clicks and flows without thinking required.

 

[jack sparrow]

though i have not lived as long as many of you, i have compiled many thoughts about women into a simple point system.

All women created have a maximum of 10 points to spend on the scale:

scale:

extremely nice,-------------------------------------so so sexy,
intellectual, cares about looks alot,
classy, loving, conceited, mean
doesnt care about looks


my system is that women have 10 points to spend on this scale. Some use all 10 points to the left and are very nice caring ladies that don't care about looks and are sweethearts . Some ladies are so sooooooo hot but don't really care about much else. And the ones that usually have bfs spend 5 in each slot . so theyre almost always taken.

do you guys/girls agree that using this rubric you can categorize almost any woman?

example: id say FG was 6 on the left scale for being nice, etc. and about 4 for looks and caring about hotness

have i cracked the female complexity code?!

Dude, you've cracked nothing. You never will.

You can't categorize the hundreds of millions of women on this planet with a 1-10 scale, no matter how many copies of Cosmo you've snuck into the bathroom....it just doesn't work that way.

Just try not to act :a10j10: and maybe a chick will let you smell her hair someday.

 

[pintoca]

I don't think it should be that hard. If it's the right person no scales are needed. Everything just clicks and flows without thinking required.

agreed.

the only problem is getting the right person within reach

 

[JayC9]

ok the whole point of this sounded better when i thought of it to myself before posting it. i meant to show a scale where you could categorize people into how they are from saying how many pts out of 10 they deserve for niceness, caring, non-superficiality, and then how many remaining pts/10 for how caring they are about looks, the outside in people, etc.

i guess it's not working like i'd think.

i am a 7/3 if i had to rate myself.

70% of me cares about all people and i am really nice and i dont care about looks i dont care if you're hot or not i can still like you

30% of me cares about what I look like and think like and how others i am with look, etc.

it was just a kinda personality scale gone bad. sorry fg shoulda used a different example since i don't know you well enough to have used you .

are you a virgin?

 

[Raina]

agreed.

the only problem is getting the right person within reach

Yeah but if it's the right person no amount of distance of external circumstances can get between you. They're just temporary struggles that wind up making you appreciate one another even more once you get to do the mundane things together that most people take for granted.

 

[Evil_Frisky]

LOL @ everyone NOT understanding the scale.

btw


I'm perfect

 

[redguru]

are you a virgin?

SublimeZM will get laid before this guy. He's nuttier than a Payday bar.

 

[PBR]

women are far beyond any scale....

 

[jack sparrow]

SublimeZM will get laid before this guy. He's nuttier than a Payday bar.

Nuttier than a pecan roll at Stuckeys.

 

[PBR]

Nuttier than a pecan roll at Stuckeys.

i thought it was , nuttier than squirrel sh**....????

 

[jack sparrow]

i thought it was , nuttier than squirrel sh**....????

Squirrel shit = Stuckeys pecan roll. Same thing.

 

[PBR]

damn it i like pecan rolls too...

 

[H_T_]

let's hope women don't judge you , using the same criteria........

 

[foreigngirl]

lol @ you guys, leave him alone, he is just so young that he dont know anything - yet. When he grows up he'll find out that he should never rate women

 

[awittyusername]

women are far beyond any scale....

True..especially here. Most the IA's have broke the scale when they step on it.