Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

My advice to EF's young bors

PICK3

PICK3

New member
learn to speak Chinese

china_AP111208148739_620x350.jpg


China's first aircraft carrier spotted at sea

China's first aircraft carrier spotted at sea - CBS News
 
well if they take over america, they better step up there game for chinease food, this shit sucks in the US
 
Nice, only about a half century behind the rest of the world. Them Chinks are really impressive.
 
maybe i'm arrogant and raymondcist, but i envision the chinese military to be like most of their products, shitty and weak
 
I am sure the Chinese sucks down there, it's good here in NY and Cali too.
 
They are posturing like the Soviets did and they will bankrupt themselves the way the Soviets did. There are still two Chinas and the poor are dismally poor and uneducated.
 
WoodyO said:
You want the native .PRT modeled in ProE wildfire 4, or shall I export to a STEP or X_T?
Click to expand...

I'd prefer it as a parametric model in SolidWorks part/assembly format with complete preservation of design intent.

ProE is soooo 2008.
 
WoodyO said:
Lol. Im still running SW 2009.
Click to expand...

If I remember that version correctly, that's the one that can go nuts (and crash) on you if you over-use the measurement function on a model. I'm not sure why, but 10-15 point-to-point measurements in a row will crash it.

But my only real beef with either of those programs (both Pro/E and SW) are their sweeps that involve helical guide curves -- particularly when the helix is on a slight taper. Lots of orthopedic devices rely on geometries like that, including really elaborate entry/exit features. The cross-sectional sketch will wind-back on itself and all hell breaks loose. But at least for me, it's vastly easier to debug a SW model than it is a Pro/E one. You can only hit <suppress>-<suppress>-<suppress> so many times in Pro/E before you just want to throw-in the towel.
 
mrplunkey said:
If I remember that version correctly, that's the one that can go nuts (and crash) on you if you over-use the measurement function on a model. I'm not sure why, but 10-15 point-to-point measurements in a row will crash it.

But my only real beef with either of those programs (both Pro/E and SW) are their sweeps that involve helical guide curves -- particularly when the helix is on a slight taper. Lots of orthopedic devices rely on geometries like that, including really elaborate entry/exit features. The cross-sectional sketch will wind-back on itself and all hell breaks loose. But at least for me, it's vastly easier to debug a SW model than it is a Pro/E one. You can only hit <suppress>-<suppress>-<suppress> so many times in Pro/E before you just want to throw-in the towel.
Click to expand...

knot sure of wut you speak, butt that caught my eye


just sayin'
 
PICK3 said:
knot sure of wut you speak, butt that caught my eye


just sayin'
Click to expand...

Thread run-out is a huge issue in orthopedic implants. Otherwise you get stuff breaking-off inside bones.

Think of it like when Mr. Long John gets a vibrator lost up in your pooper. It's bad news, isn't it?
 
mrplunkey said:
Thread run-out is a huge issue in orthopedic implants. Otherwise you get stuff breaking-off inside bones.

Think of it like when Mr. Long John gets a vibrator lost up in your pooper. It's bad news, isn't it?
Click to expand...

this software you speak of is measuring sumthing point to point and trying to make the best fit for geometrical changes?


why doesn't it sweep the entire object in a point cloud dense enough to measure it as if you were measuring the physical object itself :confused:
 
PICK3 said:
this software you speak of is measuring sumthing point to point and trying to make the best fit for geometrical changes?


why doesn't it sweep the entire object in a point cloud dense enough to measure it as if you were measuring the physical object itself :confused:
Click to expand...

It's a package for specifying and rendering fully-parametric three-dimensional models.

No one does blueprints anymore. We all do them as parametric solids that can be assembled, organized into machines, break-tested, etc. etc. It's incredible what can be done all inside a computer now. And when you're done, it goes straight to my five-axis thingy and we cut one right out of the material of your choice!

You can instead send it to a 3D printer, but those parts aren't nearly as strong -- unless you've got one of those sexy titanium printers. That's next on my Christmas list.
 
mrplunkey said:
It's a package for specifying and rendering fully-parametric three-dimensional models.

No one does blueprints anymore. We all do them as parametric solids that can be assembled, organized into machines, break-tested, etc. etc. It's incredible what can be done all inside a computer now. And when you're done, it goes straight to my five-axis thingy and we cut one right out of the material of your choice!

You can instead send it to a 3D printer, but those parts aren't nearly as strong -- unless you've got one of those sexy titanium printers. That's next on my Christmas list.
Click to expand...

I got's me a few of them EOS p730 thingy's, butt's I can't run ti just yet.
 
mrplunkey said:
It's a package for specifying and rendering fully-parametric three-dimensional models.

No one does blueprints anymore. We all do them as parametric solids that can be assembled, organized into machines, break-tested, etc. etc. It's incredible what can be done all inside a computer now. And when you're done, it goes straight to my five-axis thingy and we cut one right out of the material of your choice!

You can instead send it to a 3D printer, but those parts aren't nearly as strong -- unless you've got one of those sexy titanium printers. That's next on my Christmas list.
Click to expand...

want to know wut I'd like to model?
 
WoodyO said:
I got's me a few of them EOS p730 thingy's, butt's I can't run ti just yet.
Click to expand...

I had an Object Alaris 30 in my basement for about a year, but I took it into work because the engineers wanted to use it so much.
 
Oh brother... We're still finding junk off the west coast from Japan in WWII, and occasionally an unexploded German torpedo around the Atlantic. Now we have to worry about the Chinese sending a fleet of recycled Buicks and 1950s Zenith TV sets over here in the form of a war ship? Jee-whiz.... Probably we shouldn't worry about any Chinese carriers... The sheet metal will corrode and disintegrate faster than the ship can make it over here.

Charles
 
superdave said:
Want to know which tip im placing the star on top of this year?
Click to expand...

My star ornament is only about 4" in diameter. Plunkey's plunk would never fit inside it when it's angry.

And no pick3, you can't have pics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
finishing up my domestic supply cycle thank you reddit
Replies
14
Views
1K
dylangemelli
dylangemelli
Darren330
China supplies internationally: peptides, steroids (EU, UK, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan)
Replies
5
Views
845
the_alcatraz
the_alcatraz
Dinknuts
Looking to get some advice for my PCT!
Replies
22
Views
2K
25homes
25homes
FishyAnchovy
Approved Log My Orals-Only Pre-Cycle LOG
Replies
21
Views
4K
MUSTANG_18
MUSTANG_18
A
Bulking cycle advice
Replies
24
Views
4K
Tiger Salman Khan
Tiger Salman Khan
Top Bottom