Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Lebanon!!!

JerseyArt said:
Neo fascists = Modern day liberal political movement.

Aside from some unrelated (and non defining) war mongering what part of national socialism didnt you like?
Are You Really That Wrong or Are You Just Messing Around?
 
perfectworld said:
Are You Really That Wrong or Are You Just Messing Around?


National socialism was nothing more than a belief in strong central government and state control of the economy. What part of that political philosophy do you find objectionable?

Liberals toss around these terms with little to no comprehension of what they are saying. Naziis were evil, republicans are evil, therefore republicans are nazis.

National socilaism is completely incompatible with republican political philosophy. Ironically enough it is the goal of every liberal thinker.


Its awful isnt it
 
JerseyArt said:
National socialism was nothing more than a belief in strong central government and state control of the economy. What part of that political philosophy do you find objectionable?

Liberals toss around these terms with little to no comprehension of what they are saying. Naziis were evil, republicans are evil, therefore republicans are nazis.

National socilaism is completely incompatible with republican political philosophy. Ironically enough it is the goal of every liberal thinker.


Its awful isnt it
Dude...

Thats a Very Broad statement.

I listened To a Nazi Soldier Yesterday talking about the parallels On Hitler and Bush.

The Points and Conclusions He made were Very Disturbing.

He was 80 Years Old.

He Killed Jews.

And was sentenced To Death For desertion.

You seem Like Your Pretty Smart...

Either Just Fucking around Or Are Evil and Dont Care about what Is Really Happening.
 
as nice as it sounds for the syrians to be leaving lebanon (though they were bound to leave anyway, as soon as syria is invaded by the "coalition" (read: a swarm of americans, a troop of brits, 3 australians, a new zealander, and a bunch of japs without guns) how long do you guys think the lebs will take before they start bombing the shit out of each other again?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
 
GoldenDelicious said:
as nice as it sounds for the syrians to be leaving lebanon (though they were bound to leave anyway, as soon as syria is invaded by the "coalition" (read: a swarm of americans, a troop of brits, 3 australians, a new zealander, and a bunch of japs without guns) how long do you guys think the lebs will take before they start bombing the shit out of each other again?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

What?.
 
Do me a favour Jersey and distinguish between liberals and Democrats? A true liberal does not subscribe to most of what you are saying they do.
 
And Justjacked? If we let gays marry, why not dogs? If you support gay marriage you must be gay? Give me a break. Every man and woman is entitled to the same benefits that are offered. You cannot grant those benefits to one couple and turn around and refuse them to another. Many conservatives seem to have a problem with the sanctity of marriage although who knows why ;) That's fine, call it a union or whatever you want but they must be given the opportunity to qualify for the same benefits you and I can.
 
bluepeter said:
And Justjacked? If we let gays marry, why not dogs? If you support gay marriage you must be gay? Give me a break. Every man and woman is entitled to the same benefits that are offered. You cannot grant those benefits to one couple and turn around and refuse them to another. Many conservatives seem to have a problem with the sanctity of marriage although who knows why ;) That's fine, call it a union or whatever you want but they must be given the opportunity to qualify for the same benefits you and I can.


Marriage is for familys. A man and a woman create a family. Not two men or two woman. If the Church decides to allow gay marriages than it needs to be burned and all the members put to death by stoning.

We all have diferent opinions. These are mine.
 
JustJacked said:
Marriage is for familys. A man and a woman create a family. Not two men or two woman. If the Church decides to allow gay marriages than it needs to be burned and all the members put to death by stoning.

We all have diferent opinions. These are mine.

Fair enough but by being against gay marriage or gay unions you are essentially admitting that not everyone should be treated equally.
 
Top Bottom