Jacob Creutzfeldt said:No matter what the situation, she will want him to support the kid. He doesn't want the kid. Kids are expensive. He will have to pay to support the kid. His wallet will be much thinner for the next 18 years supporting a kid he didn't plan on having. That is what I mean by latching onto his wallet for the next 18 years.
I understand what you're saying, BUT she may not want a kid. If she's not with him, she may not keep the kid.
She may have wanted the kid for the sole reason to "chain him down" and marry him. How the hell could she move on to the next 'victim' if she has a child? Sure it can be done, but it will be a lot harder with the tactics she's using. IF in fact that is waht she's doing. No one knows what's on her mind.
Maybe the OP can guess if she wants his money or him.