Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Israel and its propaganda war: Its winning

MattTheSkywalker said:




What happened in Cambodia was thrid wolrd slaughter that goes on all the time. Tragic but hardly unprecedented. The Holocaust was a systematic genocide by a major world power, literally at the expense of winning the war.

Back out to pasture.

I disagree with that statement.

You are trying to rationalize mass killing vs Genocide.

Thats something you can't possibly do.(I also can't believe you actually said that so off-hand either)

And I'm roman catholic by birth but new scientist in practice.

Fonz
 
2Thick said:


HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Be nice. :)

Matt's just having a crisis of sorts.

FOnz
 
blank212 said:
My point is still valid. Egypt receives $2.1 billion and Israel receives $3 billion. At least Israel acts like a friend to the U.S.


HA HA HA HA HA .... WHOOAAAAAHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


This is the best quote yet... this is rich... I really liked this one.
 
Fonz said:


I disagree with that statement.

You are trying to rationalize mass killing vs Genocide.

Thats something you can't possibly do.(I also can't believe you actually said that so off-hand either)

And I'm roman catholic by birth but new scientist in practice.

Fonz

No - I am comparing third world slaughter with systematic slaughter by a first world nation with modern technology, at the expense of winning the war

The Nazis actually pulled resources away from the main war effort in order to implement the Holocaust. That's unprecedented.

Hence the difference.

BTW recommend the book "Constantine's Sword" if you haven't already read it.
 
2Thick said:


I must have misread due to your awful use of grammar.

I was under the impression that you attempted to claim that Germany was the first nation to attempt what you call "systematic genocide."

Or your inattentiveness.

Genocide is as old as time itself. Doing it at the expense of the war effort is unique to the nazis.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


No - I am comparing third world slaughter with systematic slaughter by a first world nation with modern technology, at the expense of winning the war

The Nazis actually pulled resources away from the main war effort in order to implement the Holocaust. That's unprecedented.

Hence the difference.

BTW recommend the book "Constantine's Sword" if you haven't already read it.

OK. That explains it better.

Just FYI: The germans offered to SELL jews to the allies for
trucks and other parts to stop the incoming russian army.
The allies refused.

Fonz
 
Fonz said:


OK. That explains it better.

Just FYI: The germans offered to SELL jews to the allies for
trucks and other parts to stop the incoming russian army.
The allies refused.

Fonz

Back in the days nobody gave a fuck about jews, I wonder why lol

So basically according to Matt, a jew that died during the Holocaust is worth more than a cambodgian ? reminds me the Civil War when a white officer was worth 2-4 blacks during prisoners exchange...... lol
 
manny78 said:


Back in the days nobody gave a fuck about jews, I wonder why lol

So basically according to Matt, a jew that died during the Holocaust is worth more than a cambodgian ? reminds me the Civil War when a white officer was worth 2-4 blacks during prisoners exchange...... lol

I'm surprised that the exchange didn't place a higher value with the officers. How much is a major general worth? 1000 enlisted?
 
Testosterone boy said:


I'm surprised that the exchange didn't place a higher value with the officers. How much is a major general worth? 1000 enlisted?

I said that number just to demonstrate, but I know it took more than one black to get a white man back. Just like in Pakistan where you need testominy by 4 women in order to equal one man in a rape trial...
 
Top Bottom