Jesus...pin said:If so, who determines what is moral behavior and what is not?
how is that possible, considering moral values have changed over time, even recently.theprofessor said:Jesus...
Jesus established morals... i never claimed anyone lived by them perfectly...Lestat said:how is that possible, considering moral values have changed over time, even recently.
moral generally speaking means that which is fair and increased overall happiness. At least that is my personal take on it.
Lestat said:how is that possible, considering moral values have changed over time, even recently.
moral generally speaking means that which is fair and increased overall happiness. At least that is my personal take on it.
nimbus said:the whole concept could even be manmade...to address feelings like guilt and vengefulness
Phenom78 said:Absent a Creator, there is no universal morality.
pin said:So, Let me just be sure that I am understanding you correctly. You are saying that there is no, or at least my be no such thing as an ultimate standard of right and wrong. And that child molestation isn't nessesarily intrinsically wrong?
Creepusmaximus said:Intrinsically wrong? it's sex to excess. A child is not your equal and you are taking advantage of them, it is to excess there for wrong.
pin said:So, Let me just be sure that I am understanding you correctly. You are saying that there is no, or at least my be no such thing as an ultimate standard of right and wrong. And that child molestation isn't nessesarily intrinsically wrong?
nimbus said:yes, exactly. it's just a bunch of atoms man
personally, i feel it's wrong
pin said:Of course you do. Your conscience which is you only link to a metephysical God tells you that it is.
JayC9 said:If there is such a thing as morality then immorality must also exist so the next question is where do you draw the line? The answer to which, is the problem.
pin said:If so, who determines what is moral behavior and what is not?
sex outside of marriage is not permited... so that would include that...nimbus said:Probly not man. cause i dont think that all of god's supposed teachings are correct. also is there anything about child molestation in religious writings? just curious
pin said:Websters Dictionary
mor-al-i-ty 1. rightness or wrongness, as of an action. 2. right or moral conduct. 3. moral principles.
The fact that you do not even properly understand what morality means shows that you cannot even begin to adequately argue any position that you hold concerning morality at all. Your lack of understanding what morality even is, probably stems from the fact that you lean toward atheism.
In the absence of God there is no moral standard. It is nothing more than moral realetivity. A moral vacuum if you will.
Ultimately, that makes it ok to kill and rape and steal. Its all just a function of natural selection, and its ok to tourcher babies. Or if you prefer, you can help people and feed the poor, or serve the sick. There really is no differance between the two. Hitler prefered to kill people and Mother Theresa prefered to help people. Niether was right or wrong. Its just a matter of preference. In the absence of God niether was right or wrong, because who is there to say that Hitler was right or wrong. Alot of people thought he was right. But then again alot of people think that Mother Theresa was right. Who decides? You?
jackangel said:my creator told me to tell you that your creator sucks.
pin said:Websters Dictionary
mor-al-i-ty 1. rightness or wrongness, as of an action. 2. right or moral conduct. 3. moral principles.
The fact that you do not even properly understand what morality means shows that you cannot even begin to adequately argue any position that you hold concerning morality at all. Your lack of understanding what morality even is, probably stems from the fact that you lean toward atheism.
In the absence of God there is no moral standard. It is nothing more than moral realetivity. A moral vacuum if you will.
Ultimately, that makes it ok to kill and rape and steal. Its all just a function of natural selection, and its ok to tourcher babies. Or if you prefer, you can help people and feed the poor, or serve the sick. There really is no differance between the two. Hitler prefered to kill people and Mother Theresa prefered to help people. Niether was right or wrong. Its just a matter of preference. In the absence of God niether was right or wrong, because who is there to say that Hitler was right or wrong. Alot of people thought he was right. But then again alot of people think that Mother Theresa was right. Who decides? You?
pin said:I absolutly agree. You and I both know that. But in other cultures this is not so. There are even sex cults that exist were children are vicimizezed. This is their religeon. If there is no God then who is to say tha they are wrong? You? Me? No, without God it is just a cultural differance and there is no right or wrong and so they are not. See what I'm saying? Shit!
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










