Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

iPad

Someone's gotta create the thread.

Apple iPad Pricing Starts at $499

Pros: looks like a good alternative for you college frats who wanna surf AND look cool on campus. Double whammy baby.

Downside: it's apple.

c

Downside is it is an apple - what a joke.

I expect this to be big. I think it will replace the college text book in a few years.

I will own one - looking stylish reading books in bed while my wife is stuck with her kindle.
 
it's cool but it's definitely no PDA unless I start wearing a purse. Cool thing to have around the house I guess or on the plane.
 
The real question is will there also be an iPad with wings? How about an iTampon? Or an iVibrator? I could really use some iCondoms tonight.








b0und (smart ass)
 
This will definitely be big with books being in electronic format now. Also, newspapers will probably pick up in popularity again in electronic format. For a commuter on a bus, subway, airplane, train they only need to cary the iPad to read however many newspapers they want and not be cluttered with paper.

You're kidding yourselves if you think this isn't going to be huge.

I'll get one and an arm band carrying case for use at the gym.
 
Definitely getting one. I get that it's a pretty useless thing but I f'ing LOVE toys and I deserve it I've been a good boy :spin:
 
did they ever finish inventing that cyber sex machine you hook up to your comptuer and someone else controls it and it simulates sex and blowjobs.

that would blow (pun intended) all this apple/mac/whatever bs out of the water. the slogan can be "there's fucks you with dropped calls,slow loading,prices,contracts. but, ours BLOWS you!!! i'd buy two
 
Damn thing doesn't even support Flash. HTML 5 is a better option long term but it's not widely supported yet.
 
blutack.jpg
 
lol @ Apple. They're truly becoming a company people love to hate with all this trendy overpriced bs.


The Truth Behind Apple's iPad

It's a console.

Apple's iPad, which launched today to much fanfare, is simply an enabling platform. Those who have the iPhone or iPod Touch, know what it's like, for the most part, to use the iPad.

Sure, the iPad's got a much larger screen, and a faster processor, and even 3G, but it's just a bigger iPod Touch.

The killer application for the iPhone, was in fact, its ability to fit right into your pocket. Can you see yourself grabbing an iPad while you dash out your front door? Not me. It's big. And I already have my notebook, which also happens to be a MacBook Pro. Sure, call me an Apple fanboy, I don't care. My main desktop is in fact, a custom built PC. But even someone like me who has an Apple product, I can't vouch for the iPad.

The most critical point about the iPad, is the fact that it can't multi-task. Like the iPod Touch and the iPhone, it can only run one application at any given time. Despite having a powerful CPU on the inside, the iPad is crippled because of its operating system, the same operating system behind the iPhone. Fundamentally, if you already have a notebook and an iPhone, the iPad will have a difficult time finding a place in your daily routine.

Let's all say it together now: no multi-tasking? What the bleep?

The truth.

The iPad is a console, in every sense of the word. The real money maker for Apple, is the App Store, iBook store, and iTunes store. The iPad will capture the audiences that the iPhone/iPod Touch wasn't, and then some. It'll also capture the core Apple audience too. I've talked to a few real Apple fans today, and even they difficulty wrapping their heads around the iPad.

The iPad is a closed system. You can't do anything you want to it. Apps must be from the App Store. Like an SNES, or a PS3, software must be sanctioned. And like consoles, only one game can be played at any given time. And Like those consoles makers, the money is in the software (for consoles, it was the license to make software).

The iTunes store, the App store, and now the iBook store. Even if Apple sold each iPad for $50, it would make back its losses in a very short time period.

Truth be told, the magic should have been in the software. Given that the iPad is a tablet, we can understand that it doesn't have a keyboard. But not to be able to let its owner run more than one app is a miserable thing. The OS could have been so much more for the iPad. What the iPad should have shipped with, was OS X, with a tablet designed UI--not a tablet, with the iPhone OS.

Like a console though, it almost doesn't matter. It's all about getting people onto the App Store and making small payments, but a lot of small payments. One closed system, many software purchases. And because of the iPhone's already enormous popularity, it's not hard to convince just even those users, to hop on the iPad.

No doubt, there will be some instances where the iPad can deliver some unique uses. For many mainstream users who either just chat, email, or browse, the iPad may be OK. But for power users who love their software and want to get things done, there are alternatives.

Did I mention you can at least chat while playing games on current generation consoles?

The Truth Behind Apple's iPad - Tom's Hardware
 
OMG Apple punked the entire world by creaing the world's biggest cell phone without a phone option!! lol

$29.95/mth for internet acess WTF??? You gotta pay for net access for your home, cell phone AND NOW ALSO an imaxipad???? People are gonna be psending $150/month just for internt access.

c
 
The iPad seems pretty underwhelming to me.

I like the idea of a bigger iPhone though. Something the size of a larger kindle that could do phone, email, web, ebook and iPod (w/video) would be fantastic.
 
Oh -- and tablet notepad too! And put a leather cover on it that would hold business cards, credit cards and my driver's license!
 
OMG Apple punked the entire world by creaing the world's biggest cell phone without a phone option!! lol

$29.95/mth for internet acess WTF??? You gotta pay for net access for your home, cell phone AND NOW ALSO an imaxipad???? People are gonna be psending $150/month just for internt access.

c

The Apple Rip-Off

Who else but Apple would make headphones proprietary? And what about the RAM upgrade for $6,100? Is there no limit to the Apple dollar-grabbing madness?


April 1, 2009
By Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

With the economy in freefall, and consumers becoming increasingly wary of spending unnecessarily, companies are having to get used to making less money. However, some companies are better placed than others to keep their bottom lines buoyant.
One company that has so far managed to buck the red ink trend is Apple. Apple is a company that’s very good at coming up with little tricks that keep their customers spending.

But the question is now serious: Is the Cupertino giant pushing customer loyalty too far and increasingly taking advantage of Apple fans?

Apple is really good at getting users to keep opening their wallets. The iPod and iPhone in particular are effectively small vacuum pumps that fit nicely into the user’s pocket and continually siphon cash to Apple’s HQ.

It started with the iTunes Store but it now extends to the App Store, and pretty soon the iPhone OS 3.0 will give developers the ability to encourage users to spend more money on additional content for apps.

The vacuum pump is slowly but steadily turned up.

But it goes further … much further. Let’s start with $99 a year for MobileMe cloud service. Sure, it’s an interesting service, but I really do wonder whether someone who has shelled out for a Mac or an iPhone hasn’t already paid enough.

After all, if you own multiple Apple devices that require data synced between them, you’re already a pretty hardcore Apple fan. But rather than cutting you a break and giving you something for free, Apple uses it as an opportunity to squeeze more cash from its fan base.

Then there are all the accessories. Nothing wrong with that, but when Apple decides to tweak a device so that existing docks and accessories don’t work, you do have to wonder: was there was a genuine technical reason behind the change, or was it motivated by a desire to sell new products (or license technology to third parties)?

With the latest iPod shuffle, Apple has even made the headphones proprietary, thanks to the addition of a remote control and mic. This means that if you break or lose your new shuffle earphones, you can look forward to spending $29 on a new pair (which, considering that your shuffle plus earphones cost $79 in the first place, the price of an Apple-endorsed replacement set seems steep). Another win for Apple.

Then there’s the way that Apple has decided that iPod touch owners should pay $9.99 for software updates. Apple claims that this charge is all down to accounting practices, but a ten dollar charge seems excessive.

Not only that, but Apple doesn’t bump up the price of the iPod touch line by the same amount for devices that come pre-loaded with the new OS. To add insult to injury, the iPhone OS 3.0 update that’s due out this summer will, for the fee, activate Bluetooth capability on the second-generation touch devices.

I find this particularly distasteful given that iPod touch owners have already paid for the Bluetooth hardware and have to pay again to get it to work. Apple did exactly the same thing with the 802.11n Wi-Fi capability on some MacBook and MacBook Pro notebooks a while ago (although users weren’t charged a whole ten bucks to activate the hidden feature).

Then there are the ridiculous prices that Apple charges for some PC upgrades. The most blatant example of Apple ripping off buyers is when it comes to RAM upgrades for the Mac Pro.

To upgrade this system from the base 6GB of RAM to the maximum of 32GB costs a whopping $6,100. If you decide to buy the RAM from Crucial and fit it yourself, that upgrade will cost you almost $2,000 less (which, to put things into perspective, is not far short of the cost of the base Mac Pro system).

Let’s also not forget about the way Apple is shifting to a model where batteries can’t be easily replaced by the end user. This ‘feature’ is beneficial to Apple.

Why? Because it builds a time bomb into every product sold. After a certain number of recharges that battery which is locked away will wear out and users can either buy a new product or replace the battery.

Well, you gotta keep ‘em coming back for more!

Apple’s entered this recession is good form. That’s partly because it’s been careful with cash and is sitting on a massive pile. But it’s also fortunate because it’s blessed with a huge base of customers who are happy, willing and able to spend money not only on Apple products, but also on additional services, upgrades and a load of accessories.

Even over the past few quarters, while many companies have been suffering, Apple has posted record profits and revenues. Will this continue?

Well, I guess we’ll have to wait and see, but I can’t see any signs that Apple customers are running out of money. Moreover, with nearly $25 billion in the bank, no debt and profit margins greater than 30% for most products, I don’t think anyone at Apple is too worried.


The Apple Rip-Off - InternetNews.com

That's the Apple way folks.

iphone-sucks.jpg
 
12 Key Features Apple iPad lacks | Tablet | iBooks| Australia

As the awe and adulation surrounding Apple's iPad announcement died down, chatter quickly turned to the plethora of features Apple deliberately excluded from the device:

1. iBooks is initially US-only

2. No built-in camera

3. No USB ports

4. No memory card read

5. Keyboard dock sold separately

6. No multi-tasking

7. No Adobe Flash support

8. Can only run Apple-sanctioned apps

9. Can only access iTunes videos and music

10. Lacks HDMI port

11. Screen is 4:3 aspect ratio, not 16:9 widescreen

12. No full GPS support

Pfffth, forget this thing. And no flash player?






b0und (not an Apple fan)
 
yeah right, I'd buy a macbook if anything and that's it

lol@ costing 2K to 6K to upgrade your ram on a pc
 
POS doesn't support flash, instead they are supporting HTML5 in lieu of flash.

Typing with one hand while eating is slowwww. HTML5 video is encoded with H.264 codec which charges a licensing fee. FF won't support that feature of HTML5 due to it not being open source. The open source nature of the net is how FF got to where they are today. It could hamper future web standards support when only a few browsers are willing to, or could afford to, pay for licensing. Open source (free) keeps everyone on a level playing field and creates a push for web standards support.

Both Google, and Apple via Chrome and Safari are pushing for this. Fuck that.
 
Last edited:
yeah right, I'd buy a macbook if anything and that's it

lol@ costing 2K to 6K to upgrade your ram on a pc

A certain gentleman inquired of a lady whether she would be willing to sleep with him for 50,000 pounds. After some hesitation, the lady replied that she supposed she would, in consideration of the magnitude of the offer. Then he asked whether she would sleep with him for twopence.
"Certainly not," she responded with indignation. "Just what kind of lady do you think I am?"

"Madam, I believe we have already established that," he remarked calmly. "Now we are just haggling over the price."
 
Top Bottom