First of all, I'm all about businesses doing what they need to do to remain competitive when it comes to lower-quality employees.
But you do realize that by referring to him as "some ADD issues", you've acknowledged a recognized disability and he qualifies under the Americans with Disabilities Act, don't you? Unless you have reached-out to him and made "reasonable accomodations" to help him deal with his condition at work, you just violated the law.
Another great example is alcoholism. You can show-up to work drunk and I can fire you. But once you come into my office and confess that you are an alcoholic and seeking treatment, the water gets muddy in one hell of a hurry.
We need HR on this one! Doesn't stilleto have some obligation to an employee she openly acknowledges as ADD?
HR stands for heather rae, not Human resources.
btw YOU do realize that just because *I* say he has some ADD issues doesn't mean that a doctor has, right? or that he's even mentioned them to me at all, right? You realize that he didn't "confess" anything to me, or that he's being let go because of his supposed ADD issues- he's being let go because we don't have enough work for him and he doesn't complete the projects he has and because he's in college, I never know when he'll even be here.
Plunkster, I know you're rather uptight, but you don't have to take EVERYTHING literally. I didn't say "I know he has ADD", and he's not covered under the american's with disabilities act.
lol