Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

I find this broad deeply tagable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gambino
  • Start date Start date
calveless wonder said:
jesus, you guys really find her attractive? her face is all fucked up

She's definetely below average...borderline ugly

i pray you guys can pull in some better ass then this

jesus don't tag fatties
 
well, her face is buck nasty but I'm feelin' that body, specially those titties. For me the face is KEY. But if it's for one drunkin' dark night you cant see her face anyways :D
 
LOL at smurfy's ownage "None of you have girlfriends..."

LMAO at Ulcasterdropout's ownage "when you lost your virginity at 12"

I can't believe so many are opposed to this broad. I must have fucked up taste.
If she got any bigger it wouldn't be cool but where she's at is fine

http://img63.echo.cx/my.php?image=img185yl.jpg

chewy how the fuck can you say she is buck nasty in the face? I just don't see how
anyone could think she is ugly, maybe not pretty, but ugly? doesn't add up bor, you must be flagrantly :rainbow:
 
Last edited:
Gambino said:
LOL at smurfy's ownage "None of you have girlfriends..."

LMAO at Ulcasterdropout's ownage "when you lost your virginity at 12"

I can't believe so many are opposed to this broad. I must have fucked up taste.
If she got any bigger it wouldn't be cool but where she's at is fine

http://img63.echo.cx/my.php?image=img185yl.jpg

chewy how the fuck can you say she is buck nasty in the face? I just don't see how
anyone could think she is ugly, maybe not pretty, but ugly? doesn't add up bor, you must be flagrantly :raindow:

I would definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely definitely hit it.
 
Top Bottom