AAP,
so let me try and understand what your saying. It seems that being homosexual is different than someone who is homosexual buts acts different, like a fag (your words, not mine) and acts like a dyke. They should act "normal" people, men should act like men, albeit a homosexual man, and the dyke should act like a woman, same scenario. They bring too much attention to themselves doing this and it gives the "straight acting homosexuals" a bad name. Am I close?
I'm trying to think of a different scenario using rednecks, that I may be able to get my mind around better...
What would we do w/o the real flamers that priss around in tightass shorts, talk with that lisp thing and shit, or the dykes that sport those extreem mullets, they so much fum to laugh at. If the homosexuals get to mainstream, they won't be nearly as much fun...