How many past "lovers" is too many in a potential mate

[jerseyart]

Code

I have never caught anything. Not once. I understand your point though.

The figure though is way high. I would inagine the actual number to be somewhere around 10-25% of that figure

 

[IwouldSlamU]

the HIV thing is a TOTAL LIE

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/us.html

read my link

 

[Testosterone boy]

Interesting concept.




If someone already has such a reputation of having sex with anyone and everyone willing and mostly able, it's a turn off and maybe part of that turn off is the lack of discretion.

This girl I know that has hopped into the sack with most of the local males (and their brothers) starting f**king/dating her boss last year. She left that job because she was dating her boss to start a new job to only start f**king/dating her new boss. Now she quite her last job because of the boss/dating thing to back to the other job she quit because she was f**king/dating the first boss. It pretty bad when you mention her name and some guy in a bar will lean over and say, :I used to f**k her”.

You can enjoy sex but have a little respect for yourself or at least have a little respect for your sexual partners.

I used to f*ck that girl.....she was good.


It seems that most people have either had a bunch or just a few. Not many in betweeners which I am.


I was going strong while on the rebound when a medical doctor friend gave an alarming speech on herpes. I quit after learning about that.

Too bad...I was quite the performer.

Hung like a horse with stamina to boot. I used to rock their lil worlds.

 

[Code]

I did, and at ~1%, the margin of error is slight.

Meaning, if the total population is roughly 1% infected, my quote isn't that far off the mark.

The chances of getting HIV at 30-50 partners is EXPONENTIALLY greater than your odds of winning the lottery buying a similar number of tickets.

Losing the lotto, no big deal.
Getting AIDs, sort of a big deal.

read my link

 

[Deleted member 33117]

I would not want a girl who has no real experience for a number of reasons, that I do not want to get into, but mainly she would have no skills, and two its a sign of a low libido, which is not going to make her compatable with me.

No number would really bother me. My quesion for her would never be how many partners she has had, but how many she had while in committed relationships with someone else. Even then, if she cheated a long time ago, and has changed that might not be an issue. My real concern is not how many people she had before me, but who she is with once she is with me. So what if she was a slut. If I love her and she loves me, it does not matter.

 

[jerseyart]

Code

Not to get sidetracked.

But 1%, or approximately 3 million people, is far less than 30 million. Also, catching aids even with unprotected sex isn't absolute. Protected sex and the likelihood decreases exponentially. You are making the assumption that everyone who has had contact with someone with aids will catch it themselves.

It also assumes that those three million people are themselves sexually active, and with non hiv partners. It also assumes all three million are hiding their disease.

 

[Code]

The point isn't the difference in total, but rather the fact that people are still willing to screw people with high numbers *knowing* they run a greater risk of dying from AIDs than winning 5 grand in the pick 6.




(rhetorical question)
How many partners have you been with that have said, "I insist the guys I date wear a condom." But somehow never insist with *you*.

Code

Not to get sidetracked.

But 1%, or approximately 3 million people, is far less than 30 million. Also, catching aids even with unprotected sex isn't absolute. Protected sex and the likelihood decreases exponentially. You are making the assumption that everyone who has had contact with someone with aids will catch it themselves.

It also assumes that those three million people are themselves sexually active, and with non hiv partners. It also assumes all three million are hiding their disease.

 

[velvett]

I would not want a girl who has no real experience for a number of reasons, that I do not want to get into, but mainly she would have no skills, and two its a sign of a low libido, which is not going to make her compatable with me.

No number would really bother me. My quesion for her would never be how many partners she has had, but how many she had while in committed relationships with someone else. Even then, if she cheated a long time ago, and has changed that might not be an issue. My real concern is not how many people she had before me, but who she is with once she is with me. So what if she was a slut. If I love her and she loves me, it does not matter.

Just a few thoughts.

You can have a lot of sex and a lot of experience without being a slut (male or female). To have few sexual partners does not mean you have no skills or low libido - it just means you're picky as to whom you share your sexual organs.

Someone with many sexual partners does not provide any guarantee they will be a skillful sexual partner.

I've said this before in different context - sex has little to do with love and love has little to do with sex. (in other words, one will never reflect outcome of another)

 

[Lestat]

Just a few thoughts.

You can have a lot of sex and a lot of experience without being a slut (male or female). To have few sexual partners does not mean you have no skills or low libido - it just means you're picky as to whom you share your sexual organs.

Someone with many sexual partners does not provide any guarantee they will be a skillful sexual partner.

I've said this before in different context - sex has little to do with love and love has little to do with sex. (in other words, one will never reflect outcome of another)

wise words.

 

[jerseyart]

Hee hee

She said "share sexual organs"

heeheeheeheehhee