Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

How many past "lovers" is too many in a potential mate

I set the line @ the houston500. If you bang 500 guys in one day. That's just too many.
 
I dont really care how many she has been with, as long as she is only with me when she is with me. But if the number is high i would want her to get a checkup.
 
Discussions like this never cease to amaze me as they are begun the majority of the time by MEN. As women we are raised to believe that it is not only acceptable but desirable to have a man that is an experienced lover, but the second a man hears that a women is less than a virgin she is old, used, like thrwing a hot dog down a bowling alley (which is TOTALLY ABSURD).

GET OVER IT ALREADY.

sheesh

A woman's value does not begin or end with her sex people. The sooner American men "get this" the happier they will be.

As long as my partner is emotionally ok with the number of partners he has had and is a discreet lover than I could give a shit how many women he has tagged in his lifetime. I find men in thier mid to late 40's and up most attractive - many have never been married so you tell me what that number might be?! I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT ANY FEMALES THAT WERE IN HIS BED BEFORE ME AS MY SELF-ESTEEM IS HIGH ENOUGH THAT IF I CHOOSE TO BE THERE, CHANCES ARE THE PAST WILL BE JUST THAT: THE PAST. I AM HIS PRESENT. WHETHER OR NOT I WILL BE HIS FUTURE IS NOT THE FACTOR THAT DECIDES MY PRESENCE IN HIS BED IN THE FIRST PLACE SO WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THAT MAKE?!

Young girls/boys ie children shouldn't be having sex anyway (in my opinion that is anyonr under the age of 16/18).

Sex is a gift to be shared between two consenting adults - period. Be responsible.

I was faithful to one man for over 13 years. I had only a small number of lovers before him. Now I am fully grown. I go where I want and do what I want with whom I want - no bullshit, no drama. I dont even kiss on the first date, but if I want a fuck, I take it and leave before the wetspot hits the sheets. So this means what exactly? LOL
 
Last edited:
This is why good looking women have the easiest lives... Men bend over backwards for them, give them jobs because they sleep with them, etc... As a guy, if anyone tried that, they'd be in jail so fast..

velvett said:
This girl I know that has hopped into the sack with most of the local males (and their brothers) starting f**king/dating her boss last year. She left that job because she was dating her boss to start a new job to only start f**king/dating her new boss. Now she quite her last job because of the boss/dating thing to back to the other job she quit because she was f**king/dating the first boss. It pretty bad when you mention her name and some guy in a bar will lean over and say, :I used to f**k her”.

You can enjoy sex but have a little respect for yourself or at least have a little respect for your sexual partners.
 
Werd,

I don't disagree. The point of the thread wasn't "how big a slut would you marry":)

I'm just curious as to what differing opinion were as to how much is too much. More specifically, during a discussion yesterday, I noticed for the first time how big a difference geography (where one is from) appears to make in what is "acceptable"

Personally it isn't even a question I generally ask people, nor is it one I would answer.

But certain predispositions towards certain types of behavior (such as she really likes to be with other women) would bother me more than just numbers.
 
JerseyArt said:
Werd,

I don't disagree. The point of the thread wasn't "how big a slut would you marry":)

I'm just curious as to what differing opinion were as to how much is too much. More specifically, during a discussion yesterday, I noticed for the first time how big a difference geography (where one is from) appears to make in what is "acceptable"

Personally it isn't even a question I generally ask people, nor is it one I would answer.

But certain predispositions towards certain types of behavior (such as she really likes to be with other women) would bother me more than just numbers.

LOL Kay... so then it is more about the specific sexual behavior one has engaged in rather than number of partners. I can understand that.

But geography DEFINITELY has a lot to do with it. Move to Northern Europe. I learned SO MUCH about free thinking that TOTALLY rises above the neanderthal thinking that sadly too many peeps are victims of in the US.
 
MAX 300 said:
For a sex partner, less than 4 previous partners.

For a life partner, 0.

No exceptions.

Better start hitting the elementary schools then.
 
Past sexual endeavors doesnt bother me.. Id marry a porn star.. the mroe she lieks to fuck the better.


Besides, considering my past.. Im in NO position to judge anyone elses.
 
Oh hell, geography has quite a bit to do with it.
The chooch to chach ratio is everything.

Target rich environments always yield a higher ratio of whores to ladies.


Just like fishing or hunting, some spots are just better than others.

Werd said:
LOL Kay... so then it is more about the specific sexual behavior one has engaged in rather than number of partners. I can understand that.

But geography DEFINITELY has a lot to do with it. Move to Northern Europe. I learned SO MUCH about free thinking that TOTALLY rises above the neanderthal thinking that sadly too many peeps are victims of in the US.
 
Top Bottom