Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

How Many Black People are in Positions of Power?

Code said:


A slavery-based economy doesn't allow for the distribution of wealth. Meaning only a select few garner wealth, while the general population gets poorer and poorer.

But that is irrelevant because it was never the intention of a slave based system - distributing welath''. Slaves are supposed to be poor.

Slavery is economically a loser because there is no incentive to streamline or innovate....just throw more labor at the problem.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


Did you see the lines "disncentivizes production" in my post?

The tobacco and cotton trade made lots of money, just klike Communism made lots of money for the USSR. But slavery is a bad economic system.

If there had been no slave labor, a lot of the efficiencies now used in agriculture (machines!) would have come about a lot sooner.

Slavery made money, it was just a grossly inefficient means to do it.

i know that slavery is a bad economic system!

my point origonaly was that black people helped make this county to become what it is now.

you argued that slavery didnt work becuase its slowed technology in agriculture.

my point stands: blacks made this country money through cheap & FREE labor
 
BO-DEN said:



lmao arnt you lucky your so tuff i wish an internet 175lb fagget would say some shit like that in front of me.

i hate the internet everyone is sooo tuff

your not a fighter fagget. if you were youd respect the indians and any group that died for there way of life i wish you lived in baltimore...


What are you talking about dude? What makes you think by my statement there I am being "tuff" . I was just saying that indians were there before whit men yes, but was not a rish and powerful country, and that when white men did make it a rich and powerful country they did so in a brutal way. How does this make me sound "tuff"

And does your knowledge of history extend beyond what you have seen in "gangs of New york"???

And with regards to my statement based on Jackson, I was trying to rope that down a little but you keep trying to bring it back. Lets not get into the basis of stereotypes, it does noone any good.

-Take a fucking clue from Dial_Tone, he know how to keep his head and express himself, He made a valid point to which I had to concede, I was wrong, you on the other hand, are an inflamatory person who can not express themselves, excpet from the sounds of it, through violence. You are part of the problem, and no, not the black problem, just the problem in general.
 
pharmguy said:



What are you talking about dude? What makes you think by my statement there I am being "tuff" . I was just saying that indians were there before whit men yes, but was not a rish and powerful country, and that when white men did make it a rich and powerful country they did so in a brutal way. How does this make me sound "tuff"

And does your knowledge of history extend beyond what you have seen in "gangs of New york"???

And with regards to my statement based on Jackson, I was trying to rope that down a little but you kep trying to bring it back, let it go unless you just WANT to go there


you spoke about the slaughter.... well you being so semtic and all i thaught youd be alittle more respectful.

and as far as gangs of new york? huh?

and jackson? which one?

i think we would be better of not replying to each others posts

i dont like this JEW....
:fistfullo :nerd: :chesty:
 
BO-DEN said:



you spoke about the slaughter.... well you being so semtic and all i thaught youd be alittle more respectful.

and as far as gangs of new york? huh?

and jackson? which one?

i think we would be better of not replying to each others posts

i dont like this JEW....
:fistfullo :nerd: :chesty:



Take a fucking clue from Dial_Tone, he know how to keep his head and express himself, He made a valid point to which I had to concede, I was wrong, you on the other hand, are an inflamatory person who can not express themselves, excpet from the sounds of it, through violence. You are part of the problem, and no, not the black problem, just the problem in general.
 
BO-DEN said:



you spoke about the slaughter.... well you being so semtic and all i thaught youd be alittle more respectful.

and as far as gangs of new york? huh?

and jackson? which one?

i think we would be better of not replying to each others posts

i dont like this JEW....
:fistfullo :nerd: :chesty:

The difference here to is, You obviously have shown you Hate jews, Me I do not hate any group of people not even arabs, I am dating a lebanese girl actually. I have made some stereotypical statements and I did apologize for the offense they may have caused, but you are a hate monger with your "lets re-open Auschwitz" thing. That is not a sterotypical thing to say, its a hateful thing to say. You want to tell me jews are stingy, I know plenty that are, but that (aushwitz) is an evil thing. Notice I did not reply with "maybe we should go back to slavery" That would be too low for me. so go on with your ignorant hate mongering.

I do agree with you on one point, we do not need to reply to each other's posts anymore
 
pharmguy said:
Take a fucking clue from Dial_Tone, he know how to keep his head and express himself, He made a valid point to which I had to concede, I was wrong, you on the other hand, are an inflamatory person who can not express themselves, excpet from the sounds of it, through violence. You are part of the problem, and no, not the black problem, just the problem in general.


"death and pain are the price of change"

and we need a change in this ass backwards world
 
pharmguy said:


The difference here to is, You obviously have shown you Hate jews, Me I do not hate any group of people not even arabs, I am dating a lebanese girl actually. I have made some stereotypical statements and I did apologize for the offense they may have caused, but you are a hate monger with your "lets re-open Auschwitz" thing. That is not a sterotypical thing to say, its a hateful thing to say. You want to tell me jews are stingy, I know plenty that are, but that (aushwitz) is an evil thing. Notice I did not reply with "maybe we should go back to slavery" That would be too low for me. so go on with your ignorant hate mongering.

I do agree with you on one point, we do not need to reply to each other's posts anymore

wrong again!!

im extream yes... but i dont hate jews ,i hate what israel is doing and has done since its exsistance. it has never done anything but keep war and killing.

israel isnt going anywear because it owns our countrys "moral obligations" to make sure there isnt another 2million killed

and its my frustration that you see. and that frustration becomes violence.

i have one last question that id really like the answer too. if the un and uk didnt give palestine to israel would we even have terrorism like we have today, would we ever had
9-11...or war in afganistan????

because when i really think about it, i doubt it


that is the last post of yours i will ever reply to. please do not quote me again.
 
BO-DEN said:

i have one question that id really like the answer too. if the un and uk didnt give palestine to israel would we even have terrorism like we have today, would we ever had
9-11...or war in afganistan????

because when i really think about it, i doubt it
 
Top Bottom