Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

How Many Black People are in Positions of Power?

anabolicmd said:


Chill Farakhan. Dont forget, it was the white man that gave us the great country we have today. And Im not white myself, but I still recognize that fact.

you know im starting to see a trend here "Chill Farakhan"

youve got to be jewish

black men helped make the poor counrty america into the richest country today with free/cheap labor

"Im not gunna do what niggers will do for a dime and a white man used to get a quarter for"
 
BO-DEN said:


you know im starting to see a trend here "Chill Farakhan"

youve got to be jewish

black men helped make the poor counrty america into the richest country today with free/cheap labor

"Im not gunna do what niggers will do for a dime and a white man used to get a quarter for"

Actually, slavery probably slowed the economic growth of the country. When you have a free/cheap labor pool, it disincentivizes increased production.

Instead of innovating or streamlining, you just get more slaves. It's bad for the same reason Communism is bad - you don't maximize productivity without incentives.

Just economics for ya. Slavery is an evil concept which is sadly still practiced in much of the world.
 
pharmguy said:


No, the Indians were here first, but it was the white man whi industrialized ( and slaughtered I might add)


lmao arnt you lucky your so tuff i wish an internet 175lb fagget would say some shit like that in front of me.

i hate the internet everyone is sooo tuff

your not a fighter fagget. if you were youd respect the indians and any group that died for there way of life i wish you lived in baltimore...
 
BO-DEN said:



lmao arnt you lucky your so tuff i wish an internet 175lb fagget would say some shit like that in front of me.



Pot, this is kettle.
Come in Pot.
 
ttlpkg said:


Why would you make such a silly assumption? I don't see anywhere in the elite profile a entry for "race" (thankfully).

You don't know for sure the race or ethnicity of any given poster, and frankly, why does it matter?


the only reason I said this is because race post, after race post me and DIAL_TONE are the only black people that reply.

and we are the only people here that dont think that the majority of black people dont live to smoke crack ,have children, jump on welfair and are "clinicly RETARDED" with an IQ 65

lmao the only differance is education. i was given a bullshit education. so i had to work harder, i had to make up for it.

and you know its funny how the hearts go out to the poor little iraqi kids that need freedom so much, and need schools and hospitals all the while they will grow up and become terrorists that wish you were all DEAD!!!

but to spend tax money on american children with bad schools and no books......

weres the fun in that?

then you look down on my people but you will spend tax money on people from other countrys?

:rolleyes:

this will all change one day
 
Last edited:
MattTheSkywalker said:


Actually, slavery probably slowed the economic growth of the country. When you have a free/cheap labor pool, it disincentivizes increased production.

Instead of innovating or streamlining, you just get more slaves. It's bad for the same reason Communism is bad - you don't maximize productivity without incentives.

Just economics for ya. Slavery is an evil concept which is sadly still practiced in much of the world.

so your saying that the cotton,and tobacco trade didnt make money for this country?
 
BO-DEN said:


so your saying that the cotton,and tobacco trade didnt make money for this country?

Did you see the lines "disncentivizes production" in my post?

The tobacco and cotton trade made lots of money, just klike Communism made lots of money for the USSR. But slavery is a bad economic system.

If there had been no slave labor, a lot of the efficiencies now used in agriculture (machines!) would have come about a lot sooner.

Slavery made money, it was just a grossly inefficient means to do it.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


Actually, slavery probably slowed the economic growth of the country.

A slavery-based economy doesn't allow for the distribution of wealth. Meaning only a select few garner wealth, while the general population gets poorer and poorer.
 
Unemployment was at an all-time low, :)
 
Top Bottom