Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Gay Marriage and Other Stuff.

Status
Not open for further replies.
strongsmartsexy said:
So the only primary differentiator is in the case of vaginal sex, the primary "natural" means of preproduction

...which homosexuals are incapable of doing. I think you're coming around.
 
Longhorn85 said:
...which homosexuals are incapable of doing. I think you're coming around.
Coming around to what? You posted an analogy that completely doesn't work, and I demonstrated why it doesn't work. Procreation works consistenly well without marriage. As a matter of fact it's perfect like that.
 
Longhorn85 said:
As usual, you reach into your playbook and try to equate choosing to be gay with being black. INVALID COMPARISON.

Not going by your standards. But don't worry, you and I both agree that the black man needs to be suppressed more.

You're coming around.
 
bluepeter said:
and that has what to do with marriage exactly? Until you get past the sex part of this equation, you can't be rational in terms of discussing this.

Leave sex of any kind out of the equation, is there any reason why 2 people regardless of gender should not be allowed to fall in love and form a union, whatever it may be called? No. Every human being must be afforded the same rights otherwise it is discriminatory.

In terms of your abnormal sex arguments and 'the plumbing doesn't fit', who cares? What does marriage have to do with reproduction and vice versa? Nothing. How many children are borne out of wedlock each year in the US alone?

Get past the sex when discussing homosexuality? Hmmm, and you say I'm irrational.

There is clearly no reason 2, 3 or 8 people/animals, whatever can't form a union, but it ain't marriage necessarily.

What does marriage have to do with reproduction? The fact that you ask this question is reflective of the breakdown of the family in our society.
 
strongsmartsexy said:
Coming around to what? You posted an analogy that completely doesn't work, and I demonstrated why it doesn't work. Procreation works consistenly well without marriage. As a matter of fact it's perfect like that.

Why do you keep playing dumb in defense of a defenseless argument? You stated that the primary difference between a hetero and homo relationship is the ability to reproduce. That should tell you something very basic.
 
Longhorn85 said:
Why do you keep playing dumb in defense of a defenseless argument? You stated that the primary difference between a hetero and homo relationship is the ability to reproduce. That should tell you something very basic.
Yes, it tells you, that like any other animal on the planet, that fucking between a male of a species and female of a species, provided they can't asexually reproduce, has a high likelyhood of bring about another of it's species. This has no relevance to marriage, sexual relationships, rights, obligations or anything more than procreation.

Marriage != procreation
 
Longhorn85 said:
Get past the sex when discussing homosexuality? Hmmm, and you say I'm irrational.

There is clearly no reason 2, 3 or 8 people/animals, whatever can't form a union, but it ain't marriage necessarily.

What does marriage have to do with reproduction? The fact that you ask this question is reflective of the breakdown of the family in our society.

We are not discussing homosexuality, we are discussing the rights of all people to be able to join in a partnership based on their love for each other.

Are you saying that you must be married to reproduce? That hasn't been true in the history of mankind and certainly isn't now. However, if that were the case, it might help alleviate the over population problem on this planet.
 
strongsmartsexy said:
Yes, it tells you, that like any other animal on the planet, that fucking between a male of a species and female of a species, provided they can't asexually reproduce, has a high likelyhood of bring about another of it's species. This has no relevance to marriage, sexual relationships, rights, obligations or anything more than procreation.

Marriage != procreation

As I said to bluepeter above:


"What does marriage have to do with reproduction? The fact that you ask this question is reflective of the breakdown of the family in our society."
 
Longhorn85 said:
As I said to bluepeter above:


"What does marriage have to do with reproduction? The fact that you ask this question is reflective of the breakdown of the family in our society."
Oh please do elaborate on this pile of tripe.
 
ever see a bull humping another bull?
rooster humping another rooster?
Have you ever seen two does licking each other?
How about two male Kangaroos? lol

didn't think so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom