Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Gay Marriage and Other Stuff.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sh4dowF4lcon said:
ever see a bull humping another bull?
rooster humping another rooster?
Have you ever seen two does licking each other?
How about two male Kangaroos? lol

didn't think so.
Homosexuality is common in all species.

You're still an idiot.
 
bluepeter said:
1) We are not discussing homosexuality

2) rights of all people to be able to join in a partnership based on their love for each other.

3) Are you saying that you must be married to reproduce?

1) Check the thread title

2) Would you be against 9 men uniting in marriage? Why or Why not?

2) That is an ideal situation, and our country would be much better off, and so would our children.
 
Sh4dowF4lcon said:
ever see a bull humping another bull?
rooster humping another rooster?
Have you ever seen two does licking each other?
How about two male Kangaroos? lol

didn't think so.


As Wodin said.
 
Funny how longhorn basis his "santicity of marriage" on the simple concept of reproduction. :rolleyes: So I guess we should revoke the marriage licenses of those couples who are infertile for some reason.

So sad. Even sadder is the fact that he is going to have to live with it one day.
 
Longhorn85 said:
1) Check the thread title

2) Would you be against 9 men uniting in marriage? Why or Why not?

2) That is an ideal situation, and our country would be much better off, and so would our children.

Thread title is gay marriage. Again, that has nothing to do with reproducing or sex.
 
Longhorn85 said:
1) Check the thread title

2) Would you be against 9 men uniting in marriage? Why or Why not?

2) That is an ideal situation, and our country would be much better off, and so would our children.
Yes, because we've seen the ASTOUNDING effect marriage and procreation has had in our country so far. And the influence of religion on that has been even more profound! ;)
 
WODIN said:
Homosexuality is common in all species.

I will always be an idiot.

bullshit. I have been around farms my whole life and never saw a bull or any other animal engage in homosexual activity. Maybe if you lock two animals in the same cage? I dont know, but I never seen a bull pass up a sexy cow for another bull, and I doubt the other bull would allow it. lol


As for Wodin being an idiot, there is no doubt about that. You have proved your ignorance many times over. Not being able to stand for what is right, but cower to peer pressure is what you are best at. You resorting to personal attacks and "calling names" shows you are very infantile and unable to carry an adult conversation, let alone a debate. At least you can admit it. kudos for that.

Yes, I agree with Longhorn on reproduction. That is in our instincts for survival. Like I have stated before AAP, I dont judge any one for what they do. I dont have to agree, but I dont pass judgement in any shape or form. It is your body, your life, your issue, so I dont care if my neighbor is gay. I still dont think same sex unions should be considered "marriage".

Another part of this for me is religious convictions & beliefs. If you dont believe in God and dont believe he created Adam & Eve (versus Adam & Steve) then you cant see it from my perspective. I dont expect you to. My perspective is that it is wrong and penises werent created for dungholes, they were created for vaginas...duh!

Where would we be if our forfathers were homosexual? non-existent. There is something to be said about reproduction. Unless you are gay.
 
Longhorn85 said:
1) Check the thread title

2) Would you be against 9 men uniting in marriage? Why or Why not?

2) That is an ideal situation, and our country would be much better off, and so would our children.



1) Thread title is about marriage. Not sex. You seem to be obsessed with gay sex as you keep discussing it and reverting to it with your weak arguements.

2) Would you be against 1 man and 8 women uniting in marriage? Why or Why not?

3) Yeah... 3). Not 2) again. If you can't count past two, how can you have an intelligent conversation? If marriage is about reproduction and not love, then all these childless couples should have their marriages annulled. Going by your statement. And you would be the LAST person who anyone would turn to for ideas on what makes our country and children better. After all, you support Bush and that really helps our country huh? :rolleyes:
 
AAP said:
So I guess we should revoke the marriage licenses of those couples who are infertile for some reason.

You're pretty adept at putting words in my mouth. I never said those married must have children, although I do believe that our society is based on, and depends on, families built through marriage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom