Gay Marriage and Other Stuff.

[FreeballinDC]

Not true at all, although this is what the Gay lobby would like you to believe. I can't help it, I was born this way.

Be careful though, that is almost saying like it is an affliction that requires correction.

I cannot believe I am reading this. I thought you were a well educated individual. A graduate of the University of Texas, no less.

I did not wake up one day and decide that I liked cock better than pussy. I did not suddenly decide that a well built hairy chest would be better suited to me than the niced sized rack on Heather Locklear.

And if this is a learned behavior, then who the fuck did I learn it from? My own straight parents? Or the rest of my straight family and neighbors?

On top of which, how are you so damn sure that it's a "decision"? Did you "decide" one day to satisfy your curiosity and play for the other team, and "decided" it wasn't your bag of tricks and stayed straight?

I must know where you got this information that it is a "decision".

 

[jenscats5]

Here's some food for thought: Before the rise of civilization (~10,000 years ago), humanity operated in small tribes. The children were all raised predominantly by the women while the men secured food sources. There were no neat, pre-packaged nuclear "families," yet humanity seemed to end up okay. In fact, it most resembled being raised by a bunch of lesbians. This is in fact how it's done in many primitive tribes in africa. Last I checked they seem to have a lot fewer issues than we do.

I think people are either religious or insecure, or both. They've hinged their identity on "husband," or "wife," and they don't want to share that with gays because it damages the bullshit identity they've formed for themselves. So basically just selfishness.

Good point.....people tend to identify with those who are most like themselves and will also associate with the same.....they also feel threatened by those who are not like them....

With evolution, I'm sure we will be having this argument again and again as new "peoples" develop and come into existance.....

 

[bluepeter]

.

Unhealthy? Does AIDS ring a bell?

Uh, anal sex is practiced by many 'man and a woman' heterosexual couples dude, what's your point? AIDS is spread from 'normal' sexual relations along with needles, blood transfusions etc. etc. as well as 'gay buttsex'.......

and by the way, answer my question.

 

[AAP]

Deviant? Yes it is obvious that sex was designed to be between male and female, silly to argue otherwise.

Really? Who did you ask? God? Are you trying to say God made a mistake with his own creations? Are you questioning GOD? When did God tell you this? Oh wait... it must have been part of the message God gave Bush when Bush claims told him that he wanted Bush to be President. And so Bush told you ... and you take it as gospel. Go figure.

 

[strongsmartsexy]

Unhealthy? Does AIDS ring a bell?

You know that would be a solid argument if you were in Junior high. No, wait a minute. I think they actually teach beter than that in junior high. It seems to me they're taught that AIDS isn't a homosexual disease. Gee, what grade are you in again?

 

[AAP]

longhorn - 0

common sense and logic - 710

 

[Longhorn85]

Please explain to me why blacks and women should be afforded equal rights but those of a different sexual orientation than yours should not.

Folks with a different sexual orientation have the same rights as any other individual. What you are talking about is extending rights or priviliges BASED SIMPLY on sexual behavior, deviant behavior at that, which as many have pointed out, should be no else's business.

 

[jenscats5]

You guys are trying to make me out to be an ogre for stating the obvious. Just because people have practiced sexual deviance since Roman times doesn't make it right. Man-boy sex was practiced then too.

Deviant? Yes it is obvious that sex was designed to be between male and female, silly to argue otherwise.

Unhealthy? Does AIDS ring a bell?

How was sex designed to be between male & female?? Unless you believe sex to be for procreation only......then you have a valid point as homosexual sex does not result in procreation.....just because Tab A goes into Slot B does that make that the only acceptable "design"

And how do you know what sex was designed for?? Who told you?? A priest, your parents, God?? I believe that it's arrogant to assume what God says or believes.....we won't truly find that out until we die & meet Him ourselves.....hey, we could all be wrong....

And what about the argument that Aids actually originated from men having sex with monkeys?? Is that deviant also or not??

It's my understanding that more men transmit Aids via sex to women and intravneous drug use.....I would consider that more unhealthy.....

 

[AAP]

which as many have pointed out, should be no else's business.

So what business of it was Bush's to get involved and attempt to intrude and restrict rights that do not even exist? Nice way to contradict yourself and show your weak arguement that you can't even justify. Self ownage is the worst kind.

 

[strongsmartsexy]

Folks with a different sexual orientation have the same rights as any other individual. What you are talking about is extending rights or priviliges BASED SIMPLY on sexual behavior, deviant behavior at that, which as many have pointed out, should be no else's business.

I agree, rights and priviliges should not be based simply on sexual behavior. Deviant or not. Cool, now we have something to work with. So, marriage as presently implemented gives rights and priviledges to the spouse. Nice. And some states have marriages where the gender of the two individuals obtaining a state marriage license isn't important. Again, this is cool. I think we're set!