Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below hammercurls
New member
wich one would you do or have done
fuck it lets poll....GH Eod or Ed?
- Thread starter hammercurls
- Start date
alexmichael
Active member
EDhammercurls said:
hammercurls
New member
thanks
bullandbear
New member
ed. but i'm going to stay on it for the rest of my life
A
ALIN
Guest
daily..everyday...for as long as one can afford.
hammercurls
New member
wow 50/50. lets keep this rolling
hammercurls
New member
kbrkbr and ulter say Eod and needsize and slat1 say Ed..this is gonna be a good discussion 2night
hammercurls
New member
thats why i started this topic! i /we need answers about this game
EOD is best but no one has enough experience with it because the manufactures of gh have always said to use it daily and that's what everyone did. Recent research has showed the manufacturers were mistaken. So learn and go on.
As I have said before, I have never found gh to be particularly anabolic, even when used in conjunction with gear. I'm 49, and use it mainly for its anti-aging properties. I'm not talking about cosmetic shit like giving my skin a youthful glow or any of that nonsense, I'm talking about keeping my joints from aching the morning after a big workout, giving me greater sense of well being, speeding up my hpta recovery after a cycle ( everything shuts me down these days.) I also credit gh with boosting my immune system and lowering my blood pressure by reducing my body fat.
In other words, I don't take gh for the same reasons that a pro like needsize does. To accomplish his goals, he surely needs a lot more gh than I do and a lot more often. My goals are much less ambitious than those of a professional bodybuilder. Still, I'm scared to death that my use over the past three years has impaired my endogenous production of gh. THe fact that it now takes more gh for me to accomplish the same goals than it did three years ago would seem to confirm the validity of this fear.
If switching to eod allows my body to maintain its own production of gh, then it seems likely that doing so could actually allow me to accomplish the same goals using LESS exogenous gh. And that would mean I'm saving, not only my body's natural production of gh, but a ton of money.
In other words, I don't take gh for the same reasons that a pro like needsize does. To accomplish his goals, he surely needs a lot more gh than I do and a lot more often. My goals are much less ambitious than those of a professional bodybuilder. Still, I'm scared to death that my use over the past three years has impaired my endogenous production of gh. THe fact that it now takes more gh for me to accomplish the same goals than it did three years ago would seem to confirm the validity of this fear.
If switching to eod allows my body to maintain its own production of gh, then it seems likely that doing so could actually allow me to accomplish the same goals using LESS exogenous gh. And that would mean I'm saving, not only my body's natural production of gh, but a ton of money.
hammercurls
New member
boo-YA 
nice post kbrkbr!
nice post kbrkbr!
hammercurls
New member
Ttt!
hammercurls
New member
yea!
hammercurls
New member
i may start eod and stretch out the kit
