EU Wants Explanation From Moscow (who the fuck is the EU?!)

[XBiker]

OINKY is way to far gone to understand reason and intelligence.

 

[BO-DEN]

It wasn't russia that sold weapons. They were terrorist organizations within russia run by organized crime leaders.

 

[p0ink]

Wrong again, frances.

Can you say 'HUMAN RIGHTS' or I suppose your genocidal buddy S. Milosovicz doesnt belong in the hague?

You are suggesting that any government can do whatever it likes to it's people with out having to answer to anyone?

I suppose your OK with the torture 'factories' in Syria? or the public castrations, dismememberments and beheadings in Saudi? Or the forced female genital mutilations?

What the fuck is actually wrong with you, child?

we are talking about security measures! governments owe no reasoning or explanation to foreign governments when it comes to protecting their country and their people!

where did i ever say i approve of or support the tyranny of government and the mistreatment of its people? if anyone supports that shit is you who are against using military force to depose of the despots responsible for such action.

and for being such a champion of 'human rights', chef wide, you trash and lampoon the US government when they actually try to do something to improve the lives of people. fucking hypocrite.

 

[p0ink]

rlol thier must not be a whole lot of gravity where you live...
your mind is soup.

if we are in the buisness of taking out terrorist supporting countrys why didnt bush invade saudi arabia it was clearly the capital of terror?

it is where bin ladden lives , it is where most of the terrorists came from that where involved in 9/11...... it is where you will find terror camps and a huge alqeada support.

and stop cry like a little bitch. i say fuck russia they sold wepons to saddam to use against us in operation "iraqi freedome"

here we go again. the reasoning and logic behind not launching an attack against saudi arabia has been explained time and time again by people like jnuts, code, matt, myself, and others. do you people just not read it, or do you like to make us type the same shit over and over again.

fuck russia? what did those little kids do to deserve execution by islamofascists? were they the ones selling arms to saddam?

 

[Synpax]

The EU is the second biggest superpower in the world, the first being the USA.

The occupants of which originated from a country who is now member of the EU.

Hardly. More like 5th militarily and 3rd economically behind USA, China, Japan, and Russia (ahead of Russia and Japan economically).

 

[Synpax]

agreed 110% my point is that if russia thinks it can handle thier internal affairs anyway they want they are wrong..... esspecially when PRES. PUTIN is on WBYA's shit list.

Hardly. This makes Putin even more in Bush's corner. They have a good relationship and the US does voice concern over some of the stuff Russia does (Chechnia-type things) but officially stands behind Russia in this situation.

 

[Synpax]

I say we all pitch in and send poink this book. Maybe afterwards he won't sound as fucking stupid as he normally does in his posts concerning morality.

Surely you are joking. I cannot imagine a better book not to read concerning morality. From the reviewer:

The first chapter of Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong is the locus classicus for error theories in contemporary meta-ethics. There he argues that ordinary moral discourse and thought involve an assumption that there are what he calls "objective values," and that this assumption is false. Consequently, ordinary moral thought and language are infected by an error that precludes any ordinary moral claims and thoughts from being true.

That might be a temporary comfort for some, but it always results in disaster. Sounds like someone needs to be b-slapped by Ayn Rand.

 

[Razorguns]

350+ kids die in a riad, and Russia doesn't want an indepent committee tribunal to look into and make a report? What they got to hide?

They're starting to sound like Israel whenever asked about all the innocent palestinians who are killed in their raids. Just make an excuse and act like it didn't happen. No big deal. Time to move on.

 

[ChefWide]

ChefWide, just because you got a big head doesn't give you an excuse to call people names.

Who are you?

 

[ChefWide]

we are talking about security measures! governments owe no reasoning or explanation to foreign governments when it comes to protecting their country and their people!

How many purges of 'intellectuals' or 'undesirables' or 'agitating elements' have been purportrated in the name of National Security? How agonizingly obvious it is that you skipped your history requirement?

What was Pinochets response to international condemnation of his Death Squads? Or Papa Doc? Or Idi Amin? Or King Fahd? Or the Shah Reza? Or the Soviets? "It's a matter of national security, FUCK OFF!"

where did i ever say i approve of or support the tyranny of government and the mistreatment of its people? if anyone supports that shit is you who are against using military force to depose of the despots responsible for such action.

You support them directly by suggesting 'internal' events are beyond international concern. How in the same thread can you argue against intervention 'its their business' and at the same time suggest that you are for military force to do exactly that? Well? Which is it, Flippy? In case the Holland Tunnel sized holes in your postion aren't obvious to you, try some deep breaths.

and for being such a champion of 'human rights', chef wide, you trash and lampoon the US government when they actually try to do something to improve the lives of people. fucking hypocrite.

Really? Name one time that I did as you claim? I ONLY point out when our motives are so trasparently selfish that it makes me gag. If we are in such a huge hurry to run around the planet and improve the lives of people, where the FUCK is our support in Sudan? How about the largest humanitarian crisis in your short lifetime: Do the names 'Hutu' or 'Tutsi' ring a bell? Where were we then? Oh, I forgot, they're poor and installing a pupet regime there doesn't have a high enough return on the dollar



Don't fall into your usual 'assumption' mode: I don't think we should be in ANY of those places when we have catastrophic problems at home, which you would already know if you actually read my posts rather than just skim for 'attack' points.

We need to concentrate on America, not toss up smokescreens to try and divert attention from our own serious and growing needs.