EQ /w test VS. EQ only

[wargod666]

I've been reading a lot of contoversial disscussions if it makes sense to use EQ alone or to stack it with test or anything else..

So as I'm a AS novice (only 2wks deca - dicontinued due to gnyo last week) would you say it'll be sufficient to use EQ only at 400mg/week with 20mg/day novaldex and clomid post cycle for 12 weeks to achieve a qualitative increase in muscle mass? -

I responded very good to deca (even I 've only used it for 2wks).
Will the gains be comparable (maybe leaner)?

Or do you think it is nessecary to stack it /w Test..? I'm a little afraid concering the hair loss (all men on the mothers side of the familiy have MPB).

THX

 

[swoldier]

wargod if you do not use test then you will not grow. test should be your foundation product then stack that with Eq.

 

[Canuck4]

Id definetely run it with some test.
Also use some liquidex/arimidex and just keep the Nolva on hand.

 

[DeepZenPill]

It's not necessary to run with test. If you ran EQ at 400mg/week, train hard, and eat, you will grow. If running EQ alone, 600mg/week would be better, and I really doubt that you would need nolva with that level of EQ. The gains won't be as large as deca gains, but they will be lean gains.

Test will most certainly help and would be the much more effective route. Use an anti-aromatase with that such as arimidex and you will make lean gains as long as you're eating clean. You could get some propecia/proscar or use nizoral shampoo if you're afraid of hairloss with test.

 

[wargod666]

so if i'm about to use test an EQ would it be sufficient to use novaldex instead of arimidex (cost effective).

Don't you think I should use novaldex right away because i'm very sensitive concerining gyno.

How much does proscar cost, is it effective, do you need prescription, and how much should I take per day.
Which test would you prefer?

Thx