Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

DON'T COUNT her out..........

  • Thread starter Thread starter RyanH
  • Start date Start date
R

RyanH

Guest
This is in response to BPB's recent laugh at the prospect of a Rodham/Clinton Administration...

Everyone counted Hillary Rodham Clinton out in law school-----she graduated #1 in her law school class. Everyone counted Hillary Clinton out in Arkansas-----she went on to get major reforms pushed through the state legislature. Everyone counted Hillary Rodham out as First Lady-----she went on to serve as Co-President and was the most activist first lady in U.S. History. Everyone counted out Hillary Rodham Clinton as Senator Clinton from New York----she's now serving a 6 year term as a U.S. Senator from New York.

Boy, don't you think its about time to quit counting Hillary Rodham Clinton out........And they counted Hillary Rodham Clinton out as being the 1st Female President ever-----------she went onto become the first female President.

Get my logic?
 
Hitlary Clinton as president would be the equivalent of living in China.

Harry Browne 2004
 
MooseKnuckle said:
no political experience and suddenly is elected to a very high political office.

Alot more political experience than the G.W. Bush.
 
Everyone knows that Hillary Rodham Clinton was both Co-President of the United States-----hence, the healthy Clinton economy. Everyone also knows she was Co-Governor of Arkansas-----hence education reform in that state.

Thus, she has plenty of political experience......
 
BO-CEPHUS said:
Hitlary Clinton as president would be the equivalent of living in China.

Harry Browne 2004

It looks like we're on the same wavelength. Mr. Browne got my vote in the last election.
 
Clinton had NOTHING to do with the economy, that was all due to Alan Greenspan, don't you know that????? Clinton didn't do shit for this economy
 
Jimsbbc said:
Clinton had NOTHING to do with the economy, that was all due to Alan Greenspan, don't you know that????? Clinton didn't do shit for this economy

Wrong. The 92 tax increase passed by President Clinton contributed a great deal to the U.S. economy.
 
I've got Hillary Clintons best selling book---"It takes a Village" right here, an autographed copy. Great Book. You should read it some time.

Clinton encouraged her husband to pursue a 1992 tax increase-----thus contributing to the Clinton Economy that's soon to plummet into another recession---hence, the Appointed president is now serving....
 
She made me laugh many times.

Especially when she tried defending her husband who lied about his sexual weaknesses.

I put it this way to Father in law:

How would you feel if I got caught receiving oral sex from my assistant while still married to your daughter?

After all, I am responsible for your daughters well-being (House, car, diamond ring, etc) and its going pretty well for her.

Would all that make it ok to get a blow job from someone other than your daughter? (ie-secretary)

Needless to say, we are not close :bawling:
 
That tax increase hurt the economy if anything, it stopped investors with capital from investing in the private sector
 
Jimsbbc said:
That tax increase hurt the economy if anything, it stopped investors with capital from investing in the private sector

Right-----that tax helped cut the deficit drastically and led to the biggest economic expansion in American history.
 
another one of your Democratic delusions. Your claim is completely unsubstantiated. There was nothing that Bill did in office that positively effected the economy. You are taking credit from other economist to say that Bill did have anything to do with it, including Alan Greenspan, who is the only reason our economy has been stable at all.
 
MooseKnuckle said:
ryan, how does the deficit affect your life? .

It takes money away from healthcare, social security, funding for abortions, and funding for the arts....list goes on.....
 
RyanH said:


It takes money away from healthcare, social security, funding for abortions, and funding for the arts....list goes on.....


No money should be going to these things anyway.

What is your opinion on the Education Dept. under Clinton. They wasted and stole close to a billion dollars. The head of the department should be investigated and put in jail. Of course he want though because the government is above the law in this country.
 
Last edited:
investors pulling out of the private sector because of a tax increase is not my idea of a good move. That directly hurts the economy. There was not a huge deficit cut from that act, there was not enough made off that elite 10% to fuel a noticeable reduction
 
RyanH said:


Right-----that tax helped cut the deficit drastically and led to the biggest economic expansion in American history.


Wrong! Interest rates and the federal debt increased. You have been brainwashed by our government. They are simply taking money for the so called social security "lock box" and issuing government bonds. They happen to call this revenue making a possible surplus, yet they are going more and more into debt.
 
Hmm 2 things I have to pipe in here.

The economy was mainly booming for one good reason. The fact that hard working people make products that people want/need and that spreads so on and on and on creating business, wealth, jobs etc..
And recessions pretty much come around every 8-10 years usually in conjuction with getting fucked on energy prices. I work in business so I have seen first hand how the increased cost of energy has slowed things down. See if I have to pay more to transport goods, then the user has to pay more and will use less because his customers get the trickle down effect of transporting goods to the market and have to pay more too and thier customers and so on
. Add in the fact that it costs 40-50% more to fuel your vehicle and to heat your homes and turn on your lights, then the incresed cost of goods, little increases that you don't notice but add up take a toll on business, the employees, your savings hence the consumers and users of products have no choice but not spend aas much etc and voila you have a recession.

Taxes go up and down, people get elected and re-elected but the bottom line is Joe Blow still has to go and earn a buck so whatever dildo is in office does not make a huge difference in your everday life.

Trust me if Bill Clinton was able to legally run for a third term and had won(which he would have) there would have been an economic slowdown regardless and then people would blame him instead.
In fact the economic slowdown started approx a year before Clinton even left office, round the time the energy companies started fucking aorund and the realities of the dot com companies and the bullshitting hit the fan.

The slowdown is probably not far off it's peek then we recover over the next year or so, then things are grand for the next 7-8 years and we will praise and kiss whoever is in power's ass at that time even though it's you and I and everyone else from Canada and the USA and even Mexico who do all the fucking work.

Just my $.30, $.18 after tax
 
If she wins she will not only be the first woman in office but the first lesbian as well.:p
Or hasn't anyone figured that one out yet, even my lesbian friends think she knaws on the carpet.:D
 
Ryan you still have given no evidence to prove your argument that Hillary actually did anything during those 8 years.

Hillary Clinton will NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER become Pres. The only woman that has come close was 1st lady Regan. I seriously Doubt Ronny was in charge those last 2 years.
 
She wins, we'll all die anyways because hell will have frozen over and demons will run rampant murdering everything in sight. Ill also be taking my ass to Canada or Europe. Shes a stupid bitch who I have no respect for. Just a power hungry piece of shit
 
RyanH said:


Wrong. The 92 tax increase passed by President Clinton contributed a great deal to the U.S. economy.

Clinton wasnt inaugerated until January 1993.
 
Corrected: It was the tax cut from the first year of his administration....
 
superdave said:


Clinton wasnt inaugerated until January 1993.



Ha ha ha ha ... I think SuperDave is an asshole but he got Ryan good! he he he

Good job, SuperDave. Now, just quit being a dick.:)
 
RyanH said:
Everyone counted out Hillary Rodham Clinton as Senator Clinton from New York----she's now serving a 6 year term as a U.S. Senator from New York.

AND EVERYONE IN HER STATE HATES HER NOW!

rofl.

-Warik
 
Maybe I'm a sicko... yeah well, I probably am. But I was just thinking about this thing with Hillary and Bill...

You know how Bill cheated on her with Monica and God knows who else, right?

Well, did Hillary ever get back at him?

I mean, she slapped him once (so bloody what) but she didn't even make him sleep in the doghouse or nothing.

I was thinking, if Bill could get blown by Monica, why can't Hillary get a good headjob.... from somebody other than her no-good, cheating hubby?

And that's when I remembered that my last girlfriend told me that I give really good headjobs!

So, what do you guys reckon? I wouldn't even need to be hired as an intern or nothing, I'd do it all for free, honestly!

Wouldn't you do it, too? (Be honest now)

hardgainer (thinking out a little too loud)
 
Hillery is a bitch, period. She did nothiing for this country but stand by her man while he was getting blow jobs from Monica L. She would have a lot more credibility if she divorced the worm and proved she had half the brains they says she does. Her health care reform fell flat on it's face. As far as the economy being healthy it has absolutely nothing to do with her or her soon to be exhusband. Thank Allan Greenspan for that one. To hell with her and her slime ball husband!
 
Why do you guys think that the spouses of the Pres. have much at all to do with making policy?

The truth is that the presidential advisers, chief of staff, etc... have most of the power over making policy. I agree that Regan probably didn't run the country towards the end..... but there is NO way that Nancy was doing the job....... it was his advisors!

How much time do you think that these spouses spend in the oval office anyway? Ok, maybe there is some pillow talk about what is going on in the country, but to think that the spouse is really driving policy is mad!

GinNJuice
 
RyanH said:


Wrong. The 92 tax increase passed by President Clinton contributed a great deal to the U.S. economy.

WRONG! WAY WRONG. It wasn't Clinton, and it was not Greenspan either. It had nothing to do with tax increases or the like.

The de-privatization of the Internet in 1994 is the principal, almost SOLE, reason for the mid and late 1990s economic growth.

The amount of investment and venture capital dollars generated by this deprivatization sparked a period of great growth.

It is clear now that this was a period of over-investment, and the current slowdown is the backlash of this hyper-growth.

Sorry.
 
Top Bottom