Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Does Good Come From God?
- Thread starter javaguru
- Start date
redshirt27se
New member
good comes from unsubscribing to this thread
which part?
The treatment of women. I'm still not sure what difference it makes, why he posted that?
In the OT, it's not that God wanted things to be that way, it's because he tolerated injustices.
The OT has plenty of inspiring stories of strong women. Abigail is my favorite.
She was a smart woman with a beautiful countenance. She was married to Nabal, a mean fool with a bloated ego. Yada yada yada... God got Nabal out of the way and she then married a king.
Jesus didn't really have to address the treatment of women. Jesus was not one that cared about political change through religion. He seemed to care more about the individual relationship with God, which would make sense to take care of the problem by addressing the root cause. Anyway, his focus was on Israel and he did not want to right political or social injustices in that way.
As far as women submitting to their husbands...this is the one that the Christian men seem to keep messing up. When a woman gets married as a Christian she is supposed to become on with her husband. The husband is the symbol of God and and the wife is the symbol of the church. When a woman takes authority over her husband that is a picture of religion/church telling God what to do. When a woman chooses to let her husband be that authority she is showing others through her actions what she believes. I'm disturbed by the number of Christian men that seem to really dislike women for whatever reason. It's just something I've noticed...
The man's role in this picture is to love his wife as he loves his own body. IDK about the other women but if I had a man love me that way I wouldn't mind submitting to him. It has to be pure though, not the "I'm the head of the household, I'll choose what you wear and how you wear your hair" crap I've seen people come up with.
In the OT, it's not that God wanted things to be that way, it's because he tolerated injustices.
The OT has plenty of inspiring stories of strong women. Abigail is my favorite.
She was a smart woman with a beautiful countenance. She was married to Nabal, a mean fool with a bloated ego. Yada yada yada... God got Nabal out of the way and she then married a king. Jesus didn't really have to address the treatment of women. Jesus was not one that cared about political change through religion. He seemed to care more about the individual relationship with God, which would make sense to take care of the problem by addressing the root cause. Anyway, his focus was on Israel and he did not want to right political or social injustices in that way.
As far as women submitting to their husbands...this is the one that the Christian men seem to keep messing up. When a woman gets married as a Christian she is supposed to become on with her husband. The husband is the symbol of God and and the wife is the symbol of the church. When a woman takes authority over her husband that is a picture of religion/church telling God what to do. When a woman chooses to let her husband be that authority she is showing others through her actions what she believes. I'm disturbed by the number of Christian men that seem to really dislike women for whatever reason. It's just something I've noticed...
The man's role in this picture is to love his wife as he loves his own body. IDK about the other women but if I had a man love me that way I wouldn't mind submitting to him. It has to be pure though, not the "I'm the head of the household, I'll choose what you wear and how you wear your hair" crap I've seen people come up with.
The treatment of women. I'm still not sure what difference it makes, why he posted that?
In the OT, it's not that God wanted things to be that way, it's because he tolerated injustices.
The OT has plenty of inspiring stories of strong women. Abigail is my favorite.
Jesus didn't really have to address the treatment of women. Jesus was not one that cared about political change through religion. He seemed to care more about the individual relationship with God, which would make sense to take care of the problem by addressing the root cause. Anyway, his focus was on Israel and he did not want to right political or social injustices in that way.
As far as women submitting to their husbands...this is the one that the Christian men seem to keep messing up. When a woman gets married as a Christian she is supposed to become on with her husband. The husband is the symbol of God and and the wife is the symbol of the church. When a woman takes authority over her husband that is a picture of religion/church telling God what to do. When a woman chooses to let her husband be that authority she is showing others through her actions what she believes. I'm disturbed by the number of Christian men that seem to really dislike women for whatever reason. It's just something I've noticed...
The man's role in this picture is to love his wife as he loves his own body. IDK about the other women but if I had a man love me that way I wouldn't mind submitting to him. It has to be pure though, not the "I'm the head of the household, I'll choose what you wear and how you wear your hair" crap I've seen people come up with.
blah, blah, blah...tl;dr
Quiet woman! You need a CDD relationship!
Damn sista.... You shaked and baked my man's perimeter. I hope he was in his foxhole. Never to disagree with you.... However, his first paragraph is relevant because it exposes him as being deceptive and picking and choosing at his leisure what he thinks is true when it is convenient for him, and when he thinks it corroborates his arguement. Of course, without trying to look good, far be it.... Anyway, I'm a little curious to why he has quotes on his AV of Friedrich Nietzche who was a staunch atheist "God is Dead" excerpt. The odd thing is Nietzche was one of the biggest sexists that ever lived. He was strong proponent of women being relegated to their traditional place, being subject to men's authority and basically being kept barefoot and pregnant. Which dispels JG post of him being a proponent for Womens Suffrage.
Second, I find it odd that a person who worked in law and should know 'The Constitution" violates the 1st Amendment on a regular basis. What he forgets this country was formed because of religious persecutions. I think I read that somewhere? However, he continues to persecute people for their religious beliefs, I find that odd and tyrranical, kind of like the dictators he was talking about. He attempts to silence people through intimidation, so they can't express their religious beliefs and be free. The first amendment states, "prohibits impeding the free exercise of religion." The word "impede" means: to interfere with or slow the progress of. Sound familiar? trying to convice people their God is a fake and his belief "atheism" is right. The funny thing is atheism did not become a word until the mid 1700's. Prior to that the majority of the people in Europe believed in God. Judeo-Chistianity has been around for 6 thousand years. Oh-by-the-way, this country was built on Judeo-Christianity whether anyone likes it or not. However, they still have the choice to worship who and what they want.
The irony of atheism is it was birthed out of Newton's Law of Gravity. Which is odd considering Newton was a deeply religious man. You're talking about a man with a 150-180 IQ and Einstein was deeply religious. Two of the smartest men that lived the past 1,000 yrs and made the biggest impact on science both conceded their was a God. They realized God set the universe in motion through math and other natural laws. I know I'm not as smart as them two, I hope JG does not either. I know, they were both on LSD when they made their discoveries.... Give me some!! Psychedelic drugs do make you more creative.
For those that do not what he was talking about when he was referring to SW Asia. He is on to something. He is talking about the Asia Minor, a providence of The Roman Empire. Under the rule of Constantine, Christianity was included in the Roman religion. Hence, a lot of Christian churches were established there.
His comparison of the 1950's to the 21st century, I would believe he is indicated girls/women were still under bondage of men. Which he does have a legit arguement, however I'm in social work/academia. Trust me if I had a daughter, I would rather have her been raised in the 50's then in this era. You can just tell the majority of them have/had the absence of a strong male in their lives. As soon as they see a strong older male, they adhere to them like white on rice. I dont know if I want to throw-up or rescue them, but it is sad....
That took me less than 30 seconds to explode from my fingers you dick. 
