I agree Weapon. If you look at the enzyme capacities of the body (we lack cellulase which true herbivores have), as well as anatomical configuration of the digestive tract, even the micronutrient needs that are supplied by dietary meat then it becomes apparent that we are designed to eat just about anything.
As to chicken, for those wanting lower cholesterol, keep in mind that chicken has more!
I personally think chicken is worse than beef in terms of cleanliness and chemicals. Chickens have a ton of growth hormones and antibiotics for their weight. A recent estimation was that up to 80 percent of poultry chickens in certain conditions have cancer.
Just like with beef, if you can help it get it from quality sources and make sure it's fully cooked. A good source of beef is likely to NEVER make you sick. Think about the rich folks who eat steak tartar (basically raw). Bet you won't find many places serving chicken tartar! Why is that? The description of cattle slaughter was more akin to veal. I don't eat veal because it is a pitiful sight to see an animal starved in a cramp space and given lots of antibiotics and growth hormones. I want my beef as close to cruelty free as possible. However, lots of people will see killing of any animal as cruel, so the vegetarians will not relenquish at all.
I respect plants too. They respond to human touch, they grow towards the light, they keep our atmosphere clean of some toxins and supply us with oxygen. Vegetarians kill more plants than I do. So should I go on a rant towards them on behalf of using up plants that keep my oxygen supply in full swing? Probably not because I eat them too sometimes. I'm not starting anything just to say that life means eating another life...the form is almost irrespective.
I eat chicken and fish as well, but if you look at the diseases that both chicken and fish can transmit they basically have much more potential for public health risk than beef.
As to chicken, for those wanting lower cholesterol, keep in mind that chicken has more!
I personally think chicken is worse than beef in terms of cleanliness and chemicals. Chickens have a ton of growth hormones and antibiotics for their weight. A recent estimation was that up to 80 percent of poultry chickens in certain conditions have cancer.
Just like with beef, if you can help it get it from quality sources and make sure it's fully cooked. A good source of beef is likely to NEVER make you sick. Think about the rich folks who eat steak tartar (basically raw). Bet you won't find many places serving chicken tartar! Why is that? The description of cattle slaughter was more akin to veal. I don't eat veal because it is a pitiful sight to see an animal starved in a cramp space and given lots of antibiotics and growth hormones. I want my beef as close to cruelty free as possible. However, lots of people will see killing of any animal as cruel, so the vegetarians will not relenquish at all.
I respect plants too. They respond to human touch, they grow towards the light, they keep our atmosphere clean of some toxins and supply us with oxygen. Vegetarians kill more plants than I do. So should I go on a rant towards them on behalf of using up plants that keep my oxygen supply in full swing? Probably not because I eat them too sometimes. I'm not starting anything just to say that life means eating another life...the form is almost irrespective.
I eat chicken and fish as well, but if you look at the diseases that both chicken and fish can transmit they basically have much more potential for public health risk than beef.