ill fuckin decidedunk said:hey woot. now that we have reached 20,000 lets work on quality!![]()
baby steps good brodunk said:hey woot. now that we have reached 20,000 lets work on quality!![]()
dont rub it in lolhotzie said:everyone likes wootoom , well except digger lol
dont feel bad digger hates everyoneWootoom said:dont rub it in lol
man thats harsh brosuperdave said:You are going to be the only rob I give red to from now on. Just because of this gay-assed slapdick canadian thread.
Wootoom said:ill fuckin decide
oh shit i forgot wtf???dunk said:whoa whoa...hey...im the loogie guy remember.
oh dearFrisky said:
you need to give me some poker chipsDeterass said:I wouldn't hit it or anything .
SoKlueles said:you need to give me some poker chips
SoKlueles said:sigh
well u know what to do![]()

I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.hotzie said:dont feel bad digger hates everyone
digger said:I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.
Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?
Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?
If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.
And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.
Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.
Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.
I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
sorry you feel that way Digger cause really i am a great person. i have no hate for you man. never will.digger said:I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.
Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?
Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?
If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.
And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.
Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.
Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.
I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
another thing. you say whoever posts garbage???? guess what that GARBAGE post can turn into a really good conversation. and why would anyone always want to post serious posts????????? what fun is that???????? maybe this board should be called CC Serious Chat Boarddigger said:I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.
Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?
Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?
If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.
And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.
Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.
Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.
I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
sorry Digger ill slow down man seriously just for you. but i love the site so much its hard not postdigger said:Yeah, "hate" is much too strong a word. I'm a little disappointed that it isn't obvious to more people what Karma is supposed to be: a way of encouraging people to post better, not just more often.
Wootoom said:sorry Digger ill slow down man seriously just for you. but i love the site so much its hard not post
lolWootoom said:sorry Digger ill slow down man seriously just for you. but i love the site so much its hard not post
Wootoom said:
awesome the red i keep gettin the worse i getmusclemuscle said:laughing at your own post.....classic
sowwy digger i was just tryin to make wootoom feel better ..oh and damn K whoresdigger said:I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.
Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?
Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?
If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.
And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.
Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.
Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.
I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
sometimes favoritism plays a role in how one takes a post.digger said:I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.
Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?
Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?
If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.
And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.
Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.
Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.
I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
LOLWootoom said:
Wootoom said:nice bump
Wootoom said:i hate this guy
i did. hes not even str8jack_schitt said:Me too. I think I voted no
Wootoom said:i did. hes not even str8
good answer brojon79 said:i don't know ya but i will say yes
what the fuckjack_schitt said:Your thinking of Hotzie
Wootoom said:good answer bro
you're cool bro.Wootoom said:Yes
No
Maybe so
kind of
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










