Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Do you like me??

Do you Like Me?

  • Yes

    Votes: 30 61.2%
  • No

    Votes: 4 8.2%
  • maybe so

    Votes: 3 6.1%
  • who cares

    Votes: 8 16.3%
  • HELL no!

    Votes: 4 8.2%

  • Total voters
    49

wootoom

EF MOD
Moderator
Yes
No
Maybe so
kind of
 
You are going to be the only rob I give red to from now on. Just because of this gay-assed slapdick canadian thread.
 
Yes!
 
hotzie said:
dont feel bad digger hates everyone
I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.

Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?

Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?





If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.

And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.

Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.

Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.

I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
 
digger said:
I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.

Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?

Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?





If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.

And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.

Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.

Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.

I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.

lol digger owns once again
 
digger said:
I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.

Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?

Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?





If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.

And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.

Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.

Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.

I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
sorry you feel that way Digger cause really i am a great person. i have no hate for you man. never will.
 
digger said:
I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.

Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?

Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?





If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.

And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.

Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.

Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.

I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
another thing. you say whoever posts garbage???? guess what that GARBAGE post can turn into a really good conversation. and why would anyone always want to post serious posts????????? what fun is that???????? maybe this board should be called CC Serious Chat Board
 
Yeah, "hate" is much too strong a word. I'm a little disappointed that it isn't obvious to more people what Karma is supposed to be: a way of encouraging people to post better, not just more often.
 
digger said:
Yeah, "hate" is much too strong a word. I'm a little disappointed that it isn't obvious to more people what Karma is supposed to be: a way of encouraging people to post better, not just more often.
sorry Digger ill slow down man seriously just for you. but i love the site so much its hard not post
 
Good bro!
(despite his redneckness ;) j/k)
 
digger said:
I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.

Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?

Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?





If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.

And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.

Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.

Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.

I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
sowwy digger i was just tryin to make wootoom feel better ..oh and damn K whores
 
digger said:
I can see how you get that impression, but it's not right, you know. Problem is that I see K-whores. They're everywhere.

Real simple question: Do you give green to the person or to their posts?

Think about it for a second. Which is it? Do you give K to Wootoom, or to what he posts?





If you said "Wootoom, the person," then I wish you'd go away. Nothing personal.

And if you give red to the person instead of to their post, I got a problem with that, too. The same problem.

Tuc has been trying to formulate what is wrong with Lestat, but he ended up making the same mistake. Both of them are giving K to people without even reading their posts, just checking names off a list... and posts are what EF is made out of. The only difference is that Tuc is giving mostly red and Lestat is giving mostly green. So what? It's just bad and worse.

Giving green is probably worse, because when you give people K just for showing up and posting garbage, you're telling them it's all right to keep posting crap.

I think Hammy is a sweet funny guy who should have about 25,000 in K, tops, and on that scale Wootoom rates maybe 1,200. That's assuming K is actually worth anything, which in the current circumstances is not a good assumption.
sometimes favoritism plays a role in how one takes a post.

example: lestat sees someone he likes, so even if their post is dumb, hell think its cute and find humor.

also some people's taste is different.

for example ir ead wootwoom's posts, and it remind me of a first grader, and i laugh.

btw how much karma do u think i should have, diggeR?
 
Wootoom is one of my favorites, where has he been lately?
 
I'm str8.
 
lol....Of all the people of EF, you gotta be one of the the least-caring of what others think of you...but you're cool in my book, just the same.
 
Top Bottom