DECEM, click in here OK?

[velvett]

Velvett, if you had a clue about flame etiquette, age doesnt come into play whatsoever, this is for fun and to help each other and anyone who reads it who doesnt know anything about the art of flaming.

Well, apparently I stand corrected and will never have the nerve to side with you again. If you didn't notice I was not flaming you I was pointing out a fact and the lack of someone else's maturity.

Well, fuck me.


you want unwarranted?

Your girlfriend kicked you to the curb b/c you suck in the in sack and are too quick of a lay.

THAT MY FRIEND WOULD BE UNWARRANTED

 

[WODIN]

Velvette tell the truth...That was your first flame wasn't it?

 

[decem]

i edited away my vulgarness. i am not that type of person.

havoc, you bring out the worst in me. i will not play your little games any longer.

i am not submitting to defeat, but gracefully bowing out due to my respect for the other members of the board.

that and... i don't want to inflict too much harm on havoc.

 

[MINISTER]

I think your cool velvett but your attempt at a flame was pretty lame.

 

[havoc]

Velvet, that flame was synonomous with "nanny nanny boo boo stick your head in doo doo", I know you were taking my side and I would love to make you have an orgasm for that, thanks, but I was just proving a point that this is total fun, no seriousness involved. I have nothing but love for you V. peace

 

[decem]

If you didn't notice I was not flaming you I was pointing out a fact and the lack of someone else's maturity.

i'm sorry velvett, excluding my most recent post, which is extremely unlike me (i was just seeing how difficult it is to mimic havoc and write a bunch of nonsense that has no meaning whatsoever - and it aint too damn hard), please explain where i have lacked maturity in any of my posts on this board/website.

 

[velvett]

Decem,

It is clear that you are intelligent and can be well spoken but your behavior on the sticky thread to Matt and the PM/Email that you made public that should have been kept private was in bad taste.



(That is of course not to say that I have not done things in bad taste in my lifetime. *hypocrite protection disclaimer*)

 

[decem]

i understand that that post was in bad taste, and i do apologize.

like i told matt in my apology to him:

in my defense, i was extremely torqued off about my thread being deleted, and in my mind the only logical person that could be behind the deletion was matt. the deletion of that thread was the equivalent of spitting in my face. extreme circumstances call for extreme actions, and i retaliated accordingly.

had i known that matt did not delete that thread, i would never have included the contents of his pm.

i was wrong, perhaps i would have been less wrong had matt been the one that did delete my thread, but either way, i apologize for my actions.