D-blade!! Does It Really Work 500% Better Then Orals!?

[Ulter]

Come on Anthony. You've had 4 posts about everything BUT the post Macro keeps posting. Obviously you posted exactly what he said you post that YOU said you didn't. Now you ignore.
You have have no idea how well AIFM works. Not a single user of the product agrees with you that is ineffective. And that speaks volumes over your assertions as someone who has never even tried it.
As Macro keeps pointing out you're taking the discussion of the topic into your gutter.

 

[Anthony Roberts]

Come on Anthony. You've had 4 posts about everything BUT the post Macro keeps posting. Obviously you posted exactly what he said you post that YOU said you didn't. Now you ignore.
You have have no idea how well AIFM works. Not a single user of the product agrees with you that is ineffective. And that speaks volumes over your assertions as someone who has never even tried it.
As Macro keeps pointing out you're taking the discussion of the topic into your gutter.

If you read what I said, it's spot on.

Dbol is Eq, but with a 17aa instead of an ester.The Steran Nucleus is the same, but with either a 17aa, or an ester respectively. The Steran Nucleus is the same whether you call it EQ/W-no-Ester, Bold-No-Ester, Dbol-w/o a 17aa, etc...the difference is that I tried to put things into terms that the averagte person here can understand.

I put things into the simplest terms, for the members- I don't hide behind trying to talk above them, and make myself out to be someone with knowledge they can never possibly attain. Thats Macro's Job.

You know why I'm not a Vet or VIP anywhere? Because those aren't my people. I'm just another member, and the regular members are the people I care about. Hence, I put things in the easiest terms for them. I have no product to sell here. I just present the truth. I even did a free Plat report for the members, and am doing more for them, as we speak. And in that report, and in everything I write, I put things in terms anyone can understand.


If you wish to call Dbol without a 17aa "Eq with no ester" or "Boldenone" then thats the same thing that I said. It should be clear to everyone involved, and jumping on me for explaining things in common parlance, is the same as saying "No...Dblade isn't actually Eq with no ester, because that would be a gritty powder, and not a sublingual sheet"...you and Macro are trying to take a nuance of what I said, where I was correct in how I explained it to the members, and twist it to seem incorrect.

I have no product to sell here...but you and he do, and you guys CONSTANTLY attack every other EF sponsor's product. I think it's transparent what you are up to, and judging by Karma the members give me everytime I expose you, they see it too.

Also, why were all of your personal attacks on me deleted in that first thread I participated in here? As I recall, you and he had several juicy personal attacks on me, which have since been deleted...

What happened to them?

Why aren't you guys busy Karma Bombing me and shit anymore- or sending me threatening PMs? The first PM I got from Macro was threatening me- the last was much less so. What happened? Where are all the personal attacks now?

 

[Ulter]

You're doing it again. No what you posted it wrong, you know it's wrong and now you want rewrite it.

You have to be some kind of threat to a person for them to want to attack you or bomb you or send you PM's. You're not. I've never bombed anyone, ever.

 

[macrophage69alpha]

If you read what I said, it's spot on.

Dbol is Eq, but with a 17aa instead of an ester.The Steran Nucleus is the same, but with either a 17aa, or an ester respectively. The Steran Nucleus is the same whether you call it EQ/W-no-Ester, Bold-No-Ester, Dbol-w/o a 17aa, etc...the difference is that I tried to put things into terms that the averagte person here can understand.

when are you going to get it through your thick skull that methylation changes the compound. It has very different activity at the androgen receptor and non-genomically. its a completely different drug. Esterification changes the "release pattern" as the drug is innactive until its cleaved by esterase. The active drug in this case is boldenone. it does not matter what ester is used the drug is still the same only the release pattern changes. if you methylate boldenone, its no longer boldenone nor even similar to it.

so the two are completely different.

 

[Mr.X]

X as been on AG guys IGF, which he says is AMAZING and great pumps, AND Dblade, and no telling what else, how can he say its the dblade, or the IGF.......

You're reading too much ret propoganda, try thinking for yourself. Why are you brining AG IGF into this? I'm not the only one to have good feedback, so no need to be negative about it.
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=484805

You're saying that one can't be on a cycle of injectables, orals and use IGF-1 at the same time? come on be serious. There are about 20 steroid products out there - total (mainstream), you're telling me you haven't tried most of them? the bulk is just test, deca, eq, tren, anavar, winny, primo, masteron, dbol, anadrol - don't make it sound like there are 1000s of steroids out there bro. You should try re-reading my statement about d-blade and how it should be used. Unfortunately, you're better at spreading e-hate then talking about realistic means to a product. I'm not here to argue with the e-hate; in fact, if someone uses the product or they don't, it wouldn't matter to me - it's up to the user. I just don't like negativity spread about products without the people spreading the nagativity actually trying the product.

Check what thelion2005 quoted by me, the "remember" statement, that's what you should take into account before starting any attacks.

 

[Mr.X]

I've taken the time to reread the replies to this posting and have picked out the most sensible statement:

Mr. X : Remember, no one here is saying, drop your sust, deca, eq , tren etc... and replace it with "magical" d-blade, that's ludicrous. All that's being said is that d-blade is a good aid to add to your cycle; it's an oral that's effective and is a great addition to your cycle.

That makes sense.

I'm willing to try it with just my baseline HRT test and HGH. I'm used to this baseline and will feel the difference. Quite frankly .... I would not mind being wrong and getting some new growth from this product.

And I really enjoyed the debate between the knowledgable guys that joined in.

I think a lot of people are missing the point you clearly stated here bro. D-blade is just an oral aid to add to your cycle, like you would add tbol for example. It's not a replacement for any cycle, that's just overstating it. Guys are fighting a product and insulting a product for absolutely no reason but to spread e-hate. It's funny, but the guys who are talking the most shit and spreading the most e-hate about d-blade are the ones that wont ever buy or try the product - ironic

 

[Mr.X]

BTW - for those who are crying bloody murder over D-blades advertising techniques, how in the hell do you watch TV without losing your head? Get over it. It's advertisment. Please, tell me you have better things to do with your lives than bitch about advertisement. You want to call bullshit? Cool, do so and move on. The planet will not stop rotating because D-blade says so.

LOL!
thank you ... a word of reason. People bitching, complaining and spreading e-hate for no reason.

 

[GOLUAN]

WOW! I feel like im at a chemistry battle...

 

[macrophage69alpha]

just to be clear here.

never said that a sublingual precursor to boldenone would not have any effect, merely that it was not dbol like and also was not like dbol without placing strain on the liver. in addition, while such delivery technology would improve uptake that 100% absorption was not a legitimate claim.


most importantly that dianabol and boldenone are while having a similar backbone are very different drugs. Methylation completely changes the activity of a drug, it becomes a completely different drug, esterification does not (esterification is basically like a time release formula at least when injected- orally some forms can increase bioavailability- particularly ethers).

methylated drugs pass over and over through the liver, esterified drugs once cleaved and released into the plasma pass through the liver once ( perhaps a couple times if liver function is impaired) and then are broken down.

 

[Anthony Roberts]

just to be clear here.

never said that a sublingual precursor to boldenone would not have any effect, merely that it was not dbol like and also was not like dbol without placing strain on the liver. in addition, while such delivery technology would improve uptake that 100% absorption was not a legitimate claim.


most importantly that dianabol and boldenone are while having a similar backbone are very different drugs. Methylation completely changes the activity of a drug, it becomes a completely different drug, esterification does not (esterification is basically like a time release formula at least when injected- orally some forms can increase bioavailability- particularly ethers).

methylated drugs pass over and over through the liver, esterified drugs once cleaved and released into the plasma pass through the liver once ( perhaps a couple times if liver function is impaired) and then are broken down.

Which is not different from what I said. You just choose to say it in different terms, presumably to show how smart you are.

Now why don't you tell everyone why you edited my posts a few months ago, then banned me- and then denied doing it to my buisness partner?