cell tech or power tech creatine?

[ray_ivory]

which creatine is better,cell tech from muscle tech or power tech from dymatize?

 

[bigwillster]

I've used Cell Tech and I got nice results. Just be careful cuz that stuff will get you a nice gut if you don't do cardio. It has tons of sugar. If you're bulking then I say go for it. Also, make sure to drink about 1-2 gallons of day of water to keep you nicely hydrated. peace

 

[Mike P.T.]

Cell tech definately. and best timnes to take it are first thing in the morning before breakfast and immediately post workout

 

[Mike P.T.]

Cell tech definately. and best timnes to take it are first thing in the morning before breakfast and immediately post workout

 

[Mike P.T.]

Cell tech definately. and best timnes to take it are first thing in the morning before breakfast and immediately post workout

 

[Mike P.T.]

Cell tech definately. and best timnes to take it are first thing in the morning before breakfast and immediately post workout

fuck it got posted 3 times. sorry bros didnt mean for that. i like cell tech but not THAT much. hehe

 

[bigwillster]

Cell tech definately. and best timnes to take it are first thing in the morning before breakfast and immediately post workout

Above is another one your behalf Mike PT. I agree though, cell tech's da bomb. FYI there's a cheaper alternative to cell tech. It's called Creatine express by Scitec Nutrition. It has the exact same ingredients but at about 1/2 the price.

 

[Willyumyum]

Both of them aren't that good. Use EAS phosphagen or EAS phosphagen HP or Mass Quantities Volumex, all have good micronized top grade creatine, and HP has that transport system that many people feel helps them. Cell tech is overpriced sugar. And I imagine power-tech is some close-to-cell-tech rip off...

YUM

 

[Lostdog]

Whats the deal with liquid creatine good/shit?

 

[Willyumyum]

nah, waste of money...

YUM

 

[Mike P.T.]

Whats the deal with liquid creatine good/shit?

creatine is not stable in any liquid solution no matter what some companies say. like willyumyum says. waste of money although i dont agree with phosphagen being better than Cell Tech.

 

[acuraman]

Never tried Cell-tech is there a loading phase like other creatines or can you just take it like Mike said morning and post work out. Like any other protein supplement. Just curious I never tried it but looks interesting as hell

 

[Mike P.T.]

Never tried Cell-tech is there a loading phase like other creatines or can you just take it like Mike said morning and post work out. Like any other protein supplement. Just curious I never tried it but looks interesting as hell

you dont need a loading phase with creatine. its like a glass of water. once the glass is full you can no longer fill it up, its just wasted. u can load though if u want in the beginning so your muscles will hold more creatine and therefore water within the muscle to start with. either way, u will end up with the same amount in your muscles.

 

[MustAdministerSeroidS]

I used cell tech last year found it was to harch on my system got bad shits by the second week and got very bloated but i did notice substatial strength and weight gain.



M.A.S.S

 

[Diesil]

Power Tech has 10g of creatine plus 3g of Glutamine, It also has a lot less sugar (around 25 or so) the rest is complex. It is pretty new to the market. You can also get 10 more servings for around $15 cheaper then cell-tech.

 

[acuraman]

you dont need a loading phase with creatine. its like a glass of water. once the glass is full you can no longer fill it up, its just wasted.

Thanks for the info

 

[ray_ivory]

I want to try powertech but cell tech is the only creatine that has ever worked for me.