VictorBR
New member
Good thread for a good debate .
The last cardio thread was some time ago , so I decided to create this one so we can all learn from each other here
So , I will start by saying my opinion , how it works for me .
I am a believer in the theory , CALS in VS CALS out . So I do believe that the high intensity cardio , ( HIT ) will burn more calories than the low-intensity cardio ( those long 1 hour sessions , very slow paced ) . I don't believe in the burn muscle or fat for fuel . I don't think you will burn muscle protein to use as fuel unless you are VERY , VERY LEAN , around 6 % ... I do think that our body will always first rely on muscle and liver glycogen and body fat to use as fuel BEFORE breaking protein from muscle .
so , when using cardio to cut I always rely on high intensity . I believe that There are also more reasons to :
1- It is a LOT less boring, sprinting on the threadmill or soft sand and spinning is a lot more funny and challenging than walking in the threadmill for 1 hour .
2- Since it is high intensity the sessions are shorter , like 30 minutes max , no need to do it for 1 hour , even if you want to , you won't be able to .
3- I always do my cardio after my weight training , or after a protein + fat meal since my glycogen levels are low at both times .
4- I am reading a book by Dr Mauro Dipasquale ( he knows his shit ) and he said that studies ( and the studies are on the book ) have shown that HIT is anabolic . Why ? Because it makes you release a whole bunch of anabolic hormones while doing it , like HGH and others .
this theory has worked for me , since when doing HIT and I am on caloric deficit , I am not even using AAS and I am not losing any muscle mass . this is the only kind of aerobics I do and so far I have lost 44 lbs of pure fat .
I was wondering , that this thing has to be true .
Have you seen those athletes , 100 meters sprinters ? They are freaking jacked , huge , lean and dense . OK , some of them may not be natural after all , we all know this , but the training has to be a factor .
Now , have you seen marathon runners ? They look weak , flat , small and not that lean .
So , let's get it started guys , give me your opinions .
Victor
The last cardio thread was some time ago , so I decided to create this one so we can all learn from each other here
So , I will start by saying my opinion , how it works for me .
I am a believer in the theory , CALS in VS CALS out . So I do believe that the high intensity cardio , ( HIT ) will burn more calories than the low-intensity cardio ( those long 1 hour sessions , very slow paced ) . I don't believe in the burn muscle or fat for fuel . I don't think you will burn muscle protein to use as fuel unless you are VERY , VERY LEAN , around 6 % ... I do think that our body will always first rely on muscle and liver glycogen and body fat to use as fuel BEFORE breaking protein from muscle .
so , when using cardio to cut I always rely on high intensity . I believe that There are also more reasons to :
1- It is a LOT less boring, sprinting on the threadmill or soft sand and spinning is a lot more funny and challenging than walking in the threadmill for 1 hour .
2- Since it is high intensity the sessions are shorter , like 30 minutes max , no need to do it for 1 hour , even if you want to , you won't be able to .
3- I always do my cardio after my weight training , or after a protein + fat meal since my glycogen levels are low at both times .
4- I am reading a book by Dr Mauro Dipasquale ( he knows his shit ) and he said that studies ( and the studies are on the book ) have shown that HIT is anabolic . Why ? Because it makes you release a whole bunch of anabolic hormones while doing it , like HGH and others .
this theory has worked for me , since when doing HIT and I am on caloric deficit , I am not even using AAS and I am not losing any muscle mass . this is the only kind of aerobics I do and so far I have lost 44 lbs of pure fat .
I was wondering , that this thing has to be true .
Have you seen those athletes , 100 meters sprinters ? They are freaking jacked , huge , lean and dense . OK , some of them may not be natural after all , we all know this , but the training has to be a factor .
Now , have you seen marathon runners ? They look weak , flat , small and not that lean .
So , let's get it started guys , give me your opinions .
Victor

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 











