Better for weight loss? Primo or Mast

[Ol_Wolf]

I've been trying to do research and just can't find the answer to a very specific question. Undoubtedly when compared Primo is a better compound than Mast, and every bit of research I look up on it says as much. The problem is every site I look at is taking the compound and its entire list of benefits into account. What I am looking for is which is actually the best when weight loss is the only goal. Neither are really good at packing on muscle, but both do help with Primo being the better of the two. Mast is often looked at as a show prep polisher though which makes me think it may be a little better at attacking those fat cells.

So this brings me to my question:
If the objective is to only loose weight which compound is going to ramp up the metabolism and curb appetite better? Primo or Mast?

 

[Fella Finn]

I really would not depend on any steroid for weight loss

 

[Ol_Wolf]

I really would not depend on any steroid for weight loss

Not trying to depend on it, just looking for the one that will assist with the correct diet and additional supplements.

 

[dylangemelli]

Not trying to depend on it, just looking for the one that will assist with the correct diet and additional supplements.

i mean, you can always drop fat by building lean muscle but hoping to lose weight with either is not what they are intended for.. Neither is used for appetite suppression or increasing metabolism.. i think you have a misunderstanding of them or at least the wrong expectation with them... masteron is a muscle hardener, more so an aesthetic... its definitely not going to help you at a higher body fat.. primo is a lean muscle builder.. neither is a "weight loss" type of compound.. you are looking at the wrong compound classes.. steroids are not the answer... sarms, peptides, etc.. thats where the weight loss will come into play.. you are not getting the answer you are looking for because steroids are not weight loss types of compounds

 

[the_alcatraz]

I've been trying to do research and just can't find the answer to a very specific question. Undoubtedly when compared Primo is a better compound than Mast, and every bit of research I look up on it says as much. The problem is every site I look at is taking the compound and its entire list of benefits into account. What I am looking for is which is actually the best when weight loss is the only goal. Neither are really good at packing on muscle, but both do help with Primo being the better of the two. Mast is often looked at as a show prep polisher though which makes me think it may be a little better at attacking those fat cells.

So this brings me to my question:
If the objective is to only loose weight which compound is going to ramp up the metabolism and curb appetite better? Primo or Mast?

I don't think fat loss directly comes from steroid use. But in terms of metabolic rate and appetite, try primobolan and anavar, helped me a lot but I stacked it with cardazol too.

 

[ceo]

bros thats a wild guess but primobolan really helped me shred with low calories

 

[ROIDDERS]

hmm if you have to pick for sure primobolan

but why not stack them? like 300mgs primobolan and 100mgs masteron to level things out

 

[Quadsweep]

I prefer primobolan to cut bodyfat with a low carb diet and cardio.

 

[Ulter]

primobolan beats masteron for me IMO

 

[StevenDarwinMD]

This thread/post was reviewed by our Medical Review board.

This thread/post/message was also fact checked by Steven Darwin, MD and our medical review board.

Full editorial process was followed, and please read our medical disclaimer, check our editorial process.