Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Before & After Magic in a book?

Didn't he do a light cycle or two to begin with? He then got serious and did a year of heavy cycling.

With the right technology it's feasible. I've not personally known anyone with results quite so drastic.
Most guys I know took a few years.

I changed dramatically after my first two or cycles a few years back.
My work out weight benching was around 175 and I ended working out in the low 300's.
 
those results are incredible as in not-credible for only 1 year, even with major juice. actually I think he did a light supplement cycle (pro-hormone?) before he started juicing, but the time span between the before & after was suppossedly 1 year total.

if he was working back up to size ala casey viator and the Colorado Experiment, I might buy it, but then thats a material ommission & the blurb is VERY misleading.

i vote no.

in fact maybe this should be set up as a poll.
 
I personally know a guy who achieved first place in a BB competition (not overall) in one year. He even looked more ripped then this guy. I wish I could show you pictures, but I do not have the permission to do so, sorry.

It's possible and very unhealthy.
 
geoboy said:
I'd like to change my vote from No, to NO FUCKING WAY.

He is pretty thick for 1 year. I had great strength gains, but did not even look close to that.

If you know Swolecat, I think he told me it took 3-4 years to start wining contests. I will have to ask him to be sure.

A year of juice is a long time though. You can change ones physique dramatically. If you have the $.
 
I know that guy... Yes it is true.


"Colorado Experiment" rings a bell... you might be in the right path.
 
If you beleive that to be true then I feel bad for you, I guess you beleive in every add you read in the BB mags as well.
 
slyder190 said:
If you beleive that to be true then I feel bad for you, I guess you beleive in every add you read in the BB mags as well.


Why should I beleive the words of a guy who doesn’t know how to spell believe. :D






:chomp:
 
It's true.

I may not post much, but I know it's a verified statement.

If you were to use ALR's theory of using the body's desire to reach homeostasis, you can probably double the effectiveness of most cycles. Start with a little background in training (i.e. you were bigger at some point in the past) add some quality cycles with easy access to gear, slin, GH, recovery agents, a steady intake of 400 plus grams of protein per day (even in the middle of the night) and WHAM -- you're big and shredded. (Takes some money though.)

Your body turns over a lot of lean muscle mass each day. If you change the ratio of anabolism vs. catabolism, and averaged only a 2lb per week gain, you would put on an additional 100lbs in just a year. (Keep in mind that the chemicals will alter your genetic limit to some extent, but you would be limited to your genetic potential, so many people would taper off before 100 lbs.)

Probably a tough process on your body. But it can be done.
 
Top Bottom