Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Barry Bonds bangs #714

Will you give Barry the benefit of the doubt (as if there was any)

  • Absolutely

    Votes: 14 35.9%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 2 5.1%
  • probably not

    Votes: 2 5.1%
  • no way

    Votes: 10 25.6%
  • who cares? QT and Shortie have some bangin booties

    Votes: 9 23.1%

  • Total voters
    39
Dial_tone said:
Take out the first 5-6 years when he was still learning to read major league pitching and where would that leave him?
no where near 8.4 per at bat
the guy is great, im not denying that, hes still the best player ive ever seen, but the #s speak for themselves on how much it has helped him
 
hamstershaver said:
no where near 8.4 per at bat
the guy is great, im not denying that, hes still the best player ive ever seen, but the #s speak for themselves on how much it has helped him

I"m gonna disagree. Look at his HR versus at bats. It wasn't til '90 that he was over 30 consistently. You think he's been juicing since then? I'm saying he was still learning to read a pitcher before then.


year Bats HRs
1986 413 16
1987 551 25
1988 538 24
1989 580 19
1990 519 33
1991 510 25
1992 473 34
1993 539 46
1994 391 37
1995 506 33
1996 517 42
1997 532 40
1998 552 37
1999 355 34
2000 480 49
2001 476 73
2002 403 46
2003 390 45
2004 373 45
2005 42 5
 
Dial_tone said:
I"m gonna disagree. Look at his HR versus at bats. It wasn't til '90 that he was over 30 consistently. You think he's been juicing since then? I'm saying he was still learning to read a pitcher before then.


year Bats HRs
1986 413 16
1987 551 25
1988 538 24
1989 580 19
1990 519 33
1991 510 25
1992 473 34
1993 539 46
1994 391 37
1995 506 33
1996 517 42
1997 532 40
1998 552 37
1999 355 34
2000 480 49
2001 476 73
2002 403 46
2003 390 45
2004 373 45
2005 42 5

pre 2000 he never had one year when he hit a hr every 10 at bats
2000 and later he never had a year where he didnt hit a hr every 10 abs
sure he started having years where he was hitting 40hrs in the 90s but look at his abs, they were always over 500 when he did it
then compare that to 2000 and on
hell he had 2 years where he hit 45 hrs with less than 400 abs!!
 
are you saying in no uncertain terms that babe ruth was in fact proven not to be on steroids? there is a chance the babe took some stuff hiimself... or mantle, or aaron, and many others... you know steroids isnt exactly something new.
 
I really don't want him to pass Aaron because I don't like his attitude. He does not seem like a true team player. Plus he continually whines about the media "ruining him". But I admit that he does have one killer swing. It's a shame he couldn't show a bit more class.
 
well the Babe did injest illegal substances during his career

dude was a well documented drunkard during Prohibition
so him and bonds have something in common! Both took stuff that was illegal(and alchohol with more logical reason than steroids) during thier respective times. everyone seems to forget that
also the babe never played agaisnt any black guys
 
Top Bottom