Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Baby Einsteins: Not So Smart After All [news item]

samoth

New member
Baby Einsteins: Not So Smart After All

The claim always seemed too good to be true: park your infant in front of a video and, in no time, he or she will be talking and getting smarter than the neighbor's kid. In the latest study on the effects of popular videos such as the "Baby Einstein" and "Brainy Baby" series, researchers find that these products may be doing more harm than good. And they may actually delay language development in toddlers.

Led by Frederick Zimmerman and Dr. Dimitri Christakis, both at the University of Washington, the research team found that with every hour per day spent watching baby DVDs and videos, infants learned six to eight fewer new vocabulary words than babies who never watched the videos. These products had the strongest detrimental effect on babies 8 to 16 months old, the age at which language skills are starting to form. "The more videos they watched, the fewer words they knew," says Christakis. "These babies scored about 10% lower on language skills than infants who had not watched these videos."

It's not the first blow to baby videos, and likely won't be the last. Mounting evidence suggests that passive screen sucking not only doesn't help children learn, but could also set back their development. Last spring, Christakis and his colleagues found that by three months, 40% of babies are regular viewers of DVDs, videos or television; by the time they are two years old, almost 90% are spending two to three hours each day in front of a screen. Three studies have shown that watching television, even if it includes educational programming such as Sesame Street, delays language development. "Babies require face-to-face interaction to learn," says Dr. Vic Strasburger, professor of pediatrics at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine and a spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics. "They don't get that interaction from watching TV or videos. In fact, the watching probably interferes with the crucial wiring being laid down in their brains during early development." Previous studies have shown, for example, that babies learn faster and better from a native speaker of a language when they are interacting with that speaker instead of watching the same speaker talk on a video screen. "Even watching a live person speak to you via television is not the same thing as having that person in front of you," says Christakis.

This growing evidence led the Academy to issue its recommendation in 1999 that no child under two years old watch any television. The authors of the new study might suggest reading instead: children who got daily reading or storytelling time with their parents showed a slight increase in language skills.

Though the popular baby videos and DVDs in the Washington study were designed to stimulate infants' brains, not necessarily to promote language development, parents generally assume that the products' promises to make their babies smarter include improvement of speaking skills. But, says Christakis, "the majority of the videos don't try to promote language; they have rapid scene changes and quick edits, and no appearance of the 'parent-ese' type of speaking that parents use when talking to their babies."

As far as Christakis and his colleagues can determine, the only thing that baby videos are doing is producing a generation of overstimulated kids. "There is an assumption that stimulation is good, so more is better," he says. "But that's not true; there is such a thing as overstimulation." His group has found that the more television children watch, the shorter their attention spans later in life. "Their minds come to expect a high level of stimulation, and view that as normal," says Christakis, "and by comparison, reality is boring."

He and other experts worry that the proliferation of these products will continue to displace the one thing that babies need in the first months of life — face time with human beings. "Every interaction with your child is meaningful," says Christakis. "Time is precious in those early years, and the newborn is watching you, and learning from everything you do." So just talk to them; they're listening.

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1650352,00.html?cnn=yes
 
I saw that on the news tonight, right after they told me my computer could be at risk for watching youtube videos :worried:
 
personality disorders, adhd and a host of pathologies being blamed on "lack of face to face time with caregivers". a casual stroll through the psychoanalytic literature supports this. check out object constancy theory. you couple that with this immediate gratification generation and whamo....the apocalypse. of course every generation has had such forebodings. but i do believe ppl are gettin dumber....except for a fraction of the population and the rest(dummies) are saying "look how smart we are look out our technology)NOOOO! ONLY A HANFUL OF PPL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT. anywho....dont get me started...i have had a lot of ephedrine and caffeine today. im sorry for being arrogant.
 
I wish I could blame videos I watched as a baby for being so dumb.

Truth is my mum just dropped me on my head a couple of times.





b0und (got retarded old skool)
 
*shakes head*

More proof that there are many people who just shouldn't reproduce. ANYONE who parks their kid in front of ANYTHING (just so they can not have to be bothered interacting with the child) and fools themselves into thinking that it is NOT harmfull for the kid is a fucking idiot. period.... Sorta reminds me of the time that I read here on elite that some bobo thought it was not only acceptable but wildly amusing to leave a toddler alone IN THE BATHROOM to amuse themselves with their own image for hours on end while they watched TV in another room.

Pssssssssssshhhhhh what would people do without TV's to keep from having to talk to their kids. Oh yea, there is Xbox and ipods and gameboy, etc etc etc....
 
even though my son is 9 i interact with him everyday. he is growing up strong and has many leadership qualities. im proud of how he has grown. makes me proud to call him my son. i mean i would anyway but this adds a little something to it. tv is suppost to be used as entertainment only, not a substitute for learning and caregiving.
 
we read to our twins. . .everyday. . .since the day they were born. . .as soon as they were able, we had them begin reading to us. . .they are 7 years old and going into second grade. . .they are reading on a 7th grade level. . .there is no replacement for parenting. . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: jh1
Top Bottom