This commentator was a lot quicker onto that:
Miranda Devine
QUOTE]
And now since I did a little reading up on her it's clear where her vitriol came from, she's a neoconservative blogger in the same ballpark as Ann Coulter.......of course she hated the movie. And now after reading the whole critique I just have to shake my head, some people (especially conservatives) have no depth perception. What I mean by that is they live 6 months in the past and 6 months in the future, no more no less. It is quite impossible for these people to properly analyze anything because of this trait. Take her analysis of the N'avi in the movie "raping" local fauna and subjugating the local animals. Clearly she was texting during the movie and didn't understand what exactly the braid link really meant, it's just too much for her to process anyway. Let's just say for arguments sake that they really were "subjugating" the local animal populace....and this somehow negates Cameron's message. Well, even that critique would not fit as where would our species be if we hadn't "subjugated" horse's? I think Cameron understands that as he is clearly a student of native american culture. But there's still a respect that those cultures had for the animals they had to use to get by.....a notion I wish I could now backhand into little miranda's face. I could care less if someone didn't like the movie, but at least pay attention to the movie and get the concepts right or shut your fucking mouth.