Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Anyone remember me talking about this?

velvett

Elite Mentor
Platinum
Is 9/11 Mom Running Amok?


By Stephanie Saul
Staff Writer

January 28, 2004, 10:17 PM EST

As the sole heir of deceased World Trade Center firefighter William Lake, 9-year-old Kyler Lake received a small fortune in charity funds and death benefits.

How that money is being spent is at the heart of a vitriolic court battle, the longest-running and most hotly contested Sept. 11 case in Kings County Surrogate's Court.

Kyler's aunt and his court-appointed advocate claim the boy's mother — Lake's ex-wife Dorothy Lake — has spent so recklessly, nothing will be left by the time he grows up.

"This is a case of somebody running amok," said Kyler's aunt, Ruth Elder of Staten Island, who is Lake's sister and the executor of his estate.

A lawyer for Dorothy Lake says Lake is an excellent mother who knows what is best for her son and that Elder and others are intruding.

"I just think it's the height of gall for some people to say that 'I know better than the mother,'" said the lawyer, Larry Kelly of Setauket.

The settling of dozens of the 2,976 estates of Sept. 11 victims have devolved into angry family disputes. Often, children are caught in the middle.

Some of the disputes center on the intended use of the millions of dollars in charity money, much of it unrestricted, that flooded to the families of Sept. 11 victims.

In this case, some charities made out their checks to Dorothy Lake, and she contends the funds were meant for her as well as for Kyler.

The Lake case is apparently the only remaining Sept. 11 probate case of 242 filed in Brooklyn.

Court documents show that between Oct. 19, 2001, and Oct. 24, 2002, Dorothy Lake and Kyler received $1,377,095 in charity and survivor benefits and spent $812,935.

A large chunk of the money, $299,000, went for a down payment on a $569,000 Westhampton home, where the Lakes moved from Bay Ridge after Sept. 11.

Lake subsequently refinanced her $300,000 mortgage, increasing it to $322,000, and took out a $105,000 revolving line of credit, according to mortgage records.

Among the other expenditures, according to court records:

<$31,166 for a kid's electric Range Rover, a replica firehouse and other items for Kyler's room, including an autographed Chicago Bulls poster.

<$12,615 in clothes for Kyler.

<$12,706 in entertainment for Kyler.

<$6,440 for a birthday and First Communion party complete with a magician, balloons, music, a cake and a trampoline.

<$5,121 for pets.

<$188,106 in home improvements.

<$16,898 in hardware and appliances.

<$166,127 in unspecified miscellaneous expenditures.

"At this rate, it is submitted that substantially all the funds will be expended by the time the child reaches majority," wrote the child's court-appointed advocate, who accused Dorothy Lake of "converting" her son's funds for her own use.

The advocate, James Cahill Jr. of Brooklyn, declined to comment.

An updated accounting is due this week.

Dorothy Lake declined to comment.

William Lake, 44, of Brooklyn, was a decorated member of the Fire Department's Rescue 2 unit. His will left his Harley-Davidson to a brother, FDNY Capt. Brian Lake. Kyler got everything else. Brian was named executor.

Dorothy Lake, who had custody of Kyler, said she and William were reconciling following their 1998 divorce, questioned the validity of her ex-husband's will and challenged Brian Lake's appointment as executor.

In the ugly court battle that ensued, the two sides traded accusations but ultimately reached a compromise. Elder was named executor.

But the fight did not end there.

Kings County Surrogate Michael Feinberg barred Dorothy Lake in May from spending money from seven accounts totaling $722,712 without court permission.

And as her expenses mounted, Kyler's court-appointed advocate moved last fall to have a restriction placed on Lake's home barring its sale.

Now, Dorothy Lake is challenging Elder's status as Kyler's personal representative before the federal victim's compensation fund, from which he still stands to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Meanwhile, the lawyer for Elder, Michael Petersen of Brooklyn, questions whether Dorothy Lake should be driving a Mercedes SUV.

"The boy needs a car, but maybe a nice Camry wagon would do," he said.
 
So much sickness has come out of that day, so much just a quantum amplification of already present maladies... sad for the boy, who would really just like to have his dad back.
 
Unbelievable...

but then again, I DO believe it.

Sort of like a man who has a cleaning lady, groundskeeper, a brand-spanking new motorcycle (that needs to be kept in a separate storage facility) and is buying a 5 bedroom house (so that he can have his privacy isolating his children from their mother and her side of the family) while his children are wearing clothing that are a few sizes too small and have rips and holes.

Gotta luv the US.
 
IMO, the charity was a front to try and draw attention away from gov't ridicule and blame.

But this is some bullshit.
 
Some people have no shame at all.
 
All of those items seem to be For the child.
Albeit superfluous items.

She should get counseling, it would appear she is trying to make up for the loss with shopping spree's.

Sad really. She could be buying wicked amounts of my luv for that amount of dough.
 
Dude, she told me she doesnt do 'bears'

:lmao:
 
I agree that what she did was contemptible, but I am betting that she had a lot of "help" with what to do with all this money. It sounds like a lot of people profitted from this man's death, except the one person who he wanted to take care of. :(
 
Last edited:
This is what happens when you start giving money to murder victims. WTF?
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
This is what happens when you start giving money to murder victims. WTF?

EXACTLY

well victims' families anyway

charities are free to do whatever they please i guess, but there are plenty less fortunate people out there who could use a fraction of the MILLIONS some of these people are receiving
 
Sick and disgusting. That is why we need these court appointed guardians to take care of the kids. Too many greedy pieces of crap out there.
 
This is what happens when you give poor people money... The way she is going she'll be dead broke in a year or two and probably living on the street.
 
Big Rick Rock said:
This is what happens when you give poor people money... The way she is going she'll be dead broke in a year or two and probably living on the street.


I wonder who will she blame?
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
This is what happens when you start giving money to murder victims. WTF?

Further evidence that you cannot make people sufficient on any amount of money, whether a huge lump sum, welfare or "living wages". If the desire to outspend your income is present, a king's ransom will not last.

Mike Tyson is a better example. Wasn't he valued at 300 million dollars and is now bankrupt?
 
atlantabiolab said:


Further evidence that you cannot make people sufficient on any amount of money, whether a huge lump sum, welfare or "living wages". If the desire to outspend your income is present, a king's ransom will not last.

Mike Tyson is a better example. Wasn't he valued at 300 million dollars and is now bankrupt?

Being poor has nothing to do with Money, it has to do with mentality. No matter how much money you give them, they will be find a way to be broke again.
 
Just for the record - she was not poor and had a successful career prior to 9/11. She just has a taste for the finer things in life and given the chance I think many people would have made similiar expendatures of their own - maybe not to the same extreme on certain items but maybe wanting to see your kid happy may make you do extreme things.

I'm surprised no one picked up on the greed of the Lake In-laws that would rather cause great havoc on the child's life than see the ex-wife/widow get "any" money which regardless of moral standing is the mother of the child.

I have mixed feeling about the whole thing and I can only say that I find the actions of the Lake In-laws not to be in the best interest of the child. What they have not said in the paper is that they wish to take the funds away from Lake by trying to take her away from her. I mean hasn't the kid been through enough?

No one has asked or past judgement on the other "victims" of 9/11 and taken record as to their spending habits.

After all this time and after the many months of hell that project put me through I can't help feel sorry for her and her son.
 
Like in most cases in life, it comes down to money. The adults will fight tooth and nail over this child's money, or the money that is coming to him. All the while claiming to be doing what is best for him. I wonder if there would be this big fight if there wasn't any money involved?


I would bet that the one thing that the mom, in-laws, and everyone else are fighting over, the money, the child would give up without thinking, just to have his father back. :(
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom