
gstacker said:this is a exelent book imo tons of info and pics I also have 2005. the sample stacks they show on there are a lot diff from the average cycle from all of us. when a vet here post a cycle it makes a lot of sense to me and I can relate. anyone else notice that besides me?
schneiderc2004 said:I have the 2005 edition. Is it a lot more different/better? I wonder if QV was included in the 2006 edition.![]()
mlong23 said:Does it talk about any UG labs, as they are popping up more and more? I have the 2004 edition.
buffalo said:I don't have the 06 copy yet but if this one doesn't have many ug's i bet by next year it does,it's the future.
anthony roberts said:A few years ago, Bill Llewellyn interviewed the originator of paper anabolics on the agreement that he wouldn't talk about them openly. Instead, he put them in MD as well as in his book, and as far as I can see, was responsible for "Anabolic Insider" having the pics they published of them.
Now, since paper anabolics saftey relies on customs officials not being able to detect them, Bill really fucked the owner of the company and it's customers over.
Hence, I don't think UG Labs will be lining up to talk to Bill, since he went back on his word and royally fucked over the last one he spoke to. Also, most of the mods on his board (from what I know, 100% of them) are sources who sell only BD and human grade....so Underground Labs will not likely get much air time with his book.
I could be wrong about all this...but...I doubt it...
buffalo said:Damn i didn't know that. Personally i hope he does not get into the ug's purley just so there isn't any more un needed attention payed to them. Seeing as how he screwed that other guy over i'm guessing your right when you say they probably won't be lining up to talk to him.
jus to name a couple bd and generic suppliments im sure there are more i jus cant think of em there is a million of em that come and go so the book states they will not try and keep track of em all.......mlong23 said:Does it talk about any UG labs, as they are popping up more and more? I have the 2004 edition.
anthony roberts said:Yeah.....this is one of those "I used to like him until I knew him" cases...I know him, now that I'm in the industry....he was friendly to me at first, then I found out he'd been doing things (talking to people) behind my back in an effort to fuck me over.
Scumtastic.
thanks for the info i will get itgstacker said:this is a exelent book imo tons of info and pics I also have 2005. the sample stacks they show on there are a lot diff from the average cycle from all of us. when a vet here post a cycle it makes a lot of sense to me and I can relate. anyone else notice that besides me?
yes but I wouldn't recomend a new gear user to follow any of the sample cycles!Jdevlin1985 said:Agreed. If there is one book I could recommend to a beginner gear user, it would be this one.
gstacker said:yes but I wouldn't recomend a new gear user to follow any of the sample cycles!
buffalo said:Damn i didn't know that. Personally i hope he does not get into the ug's purley just so there isn't any more un needed attention payed to them. Seeing as how he screwed that other guy over i'm guessing your right when you say they probably won't be lining up to talk to him.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










