Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Anabolics 2002 or 2004?

AleaveR

New member
I have been looking around for a good source of info on AAS and based on the reccomendations of others, this book appears to be the best. I know that all the information in this book can probably be found on the internet but I like to have a single source that I can easily refer to whenever I have a question instead of having to search for it online.

Anyways, I noticed that the 2004 edition is about to come out but it runs about $40 dollars more than the 2002 edition. Do you guys think it is worth waiting and spending the extra money on the new version. Personally I have noticed that with a lot of my school books, previous editions are very similar to the newer ones. If you guys feel this will be the case, I am just going to go with the older one....

Thanks
 
acclu97 said:
wow that sucks....any suggestion on a good book?

Those are good books as far as drug profiles go. But when they are saying this and that company is great with no circulating fakes, etc...That is the info which gets outdate real quick at times...
 
Oh...Im not worried about which company is good or bad, etc. I am just looking for a book with good drug profiles, and stuff of that nature... I guess in that case, the cheaper opne would be best...
 
The drug profiles are good... nothing you cant find on the internet though... the 2004 will just have more/better pictures Im sure just like the 2002 did compared to the 2000. You can even send empty amps/vials into the writer of the book and he will email you back to let you know if they are fake or real. He will use the pictures for future runs.
 
Do any of you know a good place to order the book from? I looked on amazon but it takes about 12 days to ship from there.
 
i bought the 2002 after i'd been reading the boards for over a year. right off the bat i could tell the cycle advice wasn't that great, not even logical. however, the drug profiles on hand are nice. i would only use it as a source of info for drug profiles/pic, and i doubt they've changed that much in 2 years (if at all).
 
Top Bottom