Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Mammoth2500
New member
pintoca said:
That was a pretty good read. By the sounds of it DU ammunition and armour has the same effects as nuclear bombs just not as significantly harmful.
all you americans
- Thread starter GoldenDelicious
- Start date
That was a pretty good read. By the sounds of it DU ammunition and armour has the same effects as nuclear bombs just not as significantly harmful.
Sorry GD, couldn't resist. 
Wholly Fuck.pintoca said:
I was a tanker in the early 80's & I know the effective range of our weapons in the Leopard 1. This more than doubles it on the high end. If I recall correctly, we didn't have depleted uranium rounds for general use, but they were available from the U.S. if war broke out. I can see why it would be so attractive to military planners, but I think a little more social responsibility would be in order. Not just against the enemy (in a territory you don't want to occupy anyways) but in your own military.
I don't agree with GD's constant U.S. bashing, but whoever thought this was acceptable needs their head read. I wonder if it could be traced to one person or committee?
GoldenDelicious
New member
1) kerry was only a bit better than bush, so really i dont caresquatpuke said:
2) i havnt seen any of micheal moores films
3) shush, theyre chips
4) the greenpeace president is probably old, smelly and male
5) yes, i know
1) i wrote it mid afternoon before i went to the gym - and everyone knows sex before the gym is badmountain muscle said:
2) im not worried at all. im just bringing something i find distinctly hypocritical up for discussion.
3) i deny scripts only when it is in the patients interest for me to do so. you saying that a doc has a ton more education than i is idiotic, since their education is not applicable to the finer intricacies of drug therapy. id hate to break it to you but some doctors make very stupid mistakes.
4) theyre not anti US threads. theyre just threads aimed at the cracks in US policy, and the mindset of some americans on the board.
5) my stories arent terribly convoluted, theyre rather straightforward i think
well if you mofos didnt have such crappy sleeping hours we could all be awake togetherpintoca said:
and you just had the best idea about the barbecue...brb after this post
what, is that picky? thats just for a hug. you wait till you see the list for a date!hidngod said:
anyway, bloody pintoca has me craving steak. brb
KillahBee
New member
GoldenDelicious said:...that supported the war, or bush, or the bullshit that has been spun, or did at some stage support/believe in any of it, i was wondering, what do you guys think about the use of depleted uranium throughout iraq?
i mean, sorry to be that annoying jimmy the cricket voice (with an aussie accent) and bring up those things that some people here like to forget (like you know, weapons of mass destruction, osama bin laden, the association between osama and saddam that wasnt, the association between 911 and iraq that wasnt, the UN not sanctioning the war, the head of the iraq weapons inspectors "committing suicide"...how convenient..., americans calling questioners unpatriotic, freedom fries, "shock and awe" killing thousands of cowering iraqis in their homes, military protection of the oil ministry but no other ministry, abu ghraib, guatanamo bay, all those "enemy combatants" held without trial, bush winning the second election by 1%...how convenient...during the first election where electronic voting machines are used and are not subject to public scrutiny...how convenient....where evidence of vote manipulation was rife....anyway, all those things that a right thinking person would think would lead pretty instantly to impeachment and imprisonment, but apart from all that, what i want to talk about today is...
...depleted uranium. i mean, given that the world is scared shitless of terrorists detonating a "dirty bomb" in some western city, and given that its just after the 60th anniversary of atomic weapons being dropped in hiroshima/nagasaki, im curious to know what all you people who accept the war think about your military sprinkling hundreds of tonnes of depleted uranium throughout iraq, which in itself is a weapon of mass destruction, poisoning the land, air, water, people of iraq (who are giving birth to nicely deformed children as we speak, and suffering ungodly rates of previously insignificant cancers - side effects that are shared by the very soldiers using the ammunition, which is rather at odds with the "support the troops" idiots who think that public sympathy/empathy for soldiers is what is needed, rather than withdrawal from an immoral, unneccessary war (though that particular phrase has lost its poignancy through sheer repetition)
so come on. would all the pro-war, pro-"democracy", pro-"shut up GD you fucking foreigner", pro-"here is freedom, so shut up and put on your veil" people, who are so noisy in other threads, like to post their opinions on the costs, benefits, and morality of using such weapons in the context of the iraq and afghan wars?
...or will your shame, and silence, let this thread sink to the bottom of the site, until a thread comes up where its suitable for you to chime in, en masse, and type in slogans and "pwned" while you backslap each other on how wonderful you are
hm?
by the way, australia is up to its neck in iraq and afghanistan at the moment, so keep it civil...comerades
you never ended this parentheses. I can't possibly read this until you correct that.
GoldenDelicious said:of course i do. criteria are:
female
within a couple years of my age
athletic
long hair
pretty face
entertaining personality
likes to collect lingerie
applications via PM
thankyou
quit cyber stalking me you maniac
G
Gambino
Guest
GoldenDelicious said:...that supported the war, or bush, or the bullshit that has been spun, or did at some stage support/believe in any of it, i was wondering, what do you guys think about the use of depleted uranium throughout iraq?
i mean, sorry to be that annoying jimmy the cricket voice (with an aussie accent) and bring up those things that some people here like to forget (like you know, weapons of mass destruction, osama bin laden, the association between osama and saddam that wasnt, the association between 911 and iraq that wasnt, the UN not sanctioning the war, the head of the iraq weapons inspectors "committing suicide"...how convenient..., americans calling questioners unpatriotic, freedom fries, "shock and awe" killing thousands of cowering iraqis in their homes, military protection of the oil ministry but no other ministry, abu ghraib, guatanamo bay, all those "enemy combatants" held without trial, bush winning the second election by 1%...how convenient...during the first election where electronic voting machines are used and are not subject to public scrutiny...how convenient....where evidence of vote manipulation was rife....anyway, all those things that a right thinking person would think would lead pretty instantly to impeachment and imprisonment, but apart from all that, what i want to talk about today is...
...depleted uranium. i mean, given that the world is scared shitless of terrorists detonating a "dirty bomb" in some western city, and given that its just after the 60th anniversary of atomic weapons being dropped in hiroshima/nagasaki, im curious to know what all you people who accept the war think about your military sprinkling hundreds of tonnes of depleted uranium throughout iraq, which in itself is a weapon of mass destruction, poisoning the land, air, water, people of iraq (who are giving birth to nicely deformed children as we speak, and suffering ungodly rates of previously insignificant cancers - side effects that are shared by the very soldiers using the ammunition, which is rather at odds with the "support the troops" idiots who think that public sympathy/empathy for soldiers is what is needed, rather than withdrawal from an immoral, unneccessary war (though that particular phrase has lost its poignancy through sheer repetition)
so come on. would all the pro-war, pro-"democracy", pro-"shut up GD you fucking foreigner", pro-"here is freedom, so shut up and put on your veil" people, who are so noisy in other threads, like to post their opinions on the costs, benefits, and morality of using such weapons in the context of the iraq and afghan wars?
...or will your shame, and silence, let this thread sink to the bottom of the site, until a thread comes up where its suitable for you to chime in, en masse, and type in slogans and "pwned" while you backslap each other on how wonderful you are
hm?
by the way, australia is up to its neck in iraq and afghanistan at the moment, so keep it civil...comerades
Notice that parentheses that I bolded? I never found the other one, making me believe the whole posts is supposed to a qualifying or amplifying word, phrase, or sentence inserted within written matter in such a way as to be independent of the surrounding grammatical structure.
Similar threads
